Ataxin-7 and Non-stop coordinate SCAR protein levels, subcellular localization, and actin cytoskeleton organization

Abstract

Atxn7, a subunit of SAGA chromatin remodeling complex, is subject to polyglutamine expansion at the amino terminus, causing spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7), a progressive retinal and neurodegenerative disease. Within SAGA, the Atxn7 amino terminus anchors Non-stop, a deubiquitinase, to the complex. To understand the scope of Atxn7-dependent regulation of Non-stop, substrates of the deubiquitinase were sought. This revealed Non-stop, dissociated from Atxn7, interacts with Arp2/3 and WAVE regulatory complexes (WRC), which control actin cytoskeleton assembly. There, Non-stop countered polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of WRC subunit SCAR. Dependent on conserved WRC interacting receptor sequences (WIRS), Non-stop augmentation increased protein levels, and directed subcellular localization, of SCAR, decreasing cell area and number of protrusions. In vivo, heterozygous mutation of Atxn7 rescued haploinsufficiency of SCAR, but heterozygous mutation of SCAR did not significantly rescue knockdown of Atxn7.

Data availability

All proteomics data are available in the MassIVE repository. The permanent URL to the dataset is: ftp://massive.ucsd.edu/MSV000082625. The data is also accessible from: ProteomeXChange accession: PXD010462 http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/cgi/GetDataset?ID=PXD010462. MassIVE | Accession ID: MSV000082625 - ProteomeXchange | Accession ID: PXD010462

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Veronica Cloud

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ada Thapa

    School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pedro Morales-Sosa

    School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tayla Miller

    School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sara A Miller

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Daniel Holsapple

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Paige Gerhart

    School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Elaheh Momtahan

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jarrid L Jack

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Edgardo Leiva

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Sarah R Rapp

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Lauren G Shelton

    Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Richard A Pierce

    School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Skylar Martin-Brown

    Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Laurence Florens

    Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Michael P Washburn

    Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7568-2585
  17. Ryan D Mohan

    School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, United States
    For correspondence
    Mohanrd@umkc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7624-4605

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NIGMS grant 5R35GM118068)

  • Ryan D Mohan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Cloud et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,342
    views
  • 274
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Veronica Cloud
  2. Ada Thapa
  3. Pedro Morales-Sosa
  4. Tayla Miller
  5. Sara A Miller
  6. Daniel Holsapple
  7. Paige Gerhart
  8. Elaheh Momtahan
  9. Jarrid L Jack
  10. Edgardo Leiva
  11. Sarah R Rapp
  12. Lauren G Shelton
  13. Richard A Pierce
  14. Skylar Martin-Brown
  15. Laurence Florens
  16. Michael P Washburn
  17. Ryan D Mohan
(2019)
Ataxin-7 and Non-stop coordinate SCAR protein levels, subcellular localization, and actin cytoskeleton organization
eLife 8:e49677.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49677

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49677

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Fatima Tleiss, Martina Montanari ... C Leopold Kurz
    Research Article

    Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.