GC content shapes mRNA storage and decay in human cells

  1. Maïté Courel
  2. Yves Clément
  3. Clémentine Bossevain
  4. Dominika Foretek
  5. Olivia Vidal Cruchez
  6. Zhou Yi
  7. Marianne Bénard
  8. Marie‐Noëlle Benassy
  9. Michel Kress
  10. Caroline Vindry
  11. Michèle Ernoult-Lange
  12. Christophe Antoniewski
  13. Antonin Morillon
  14. Patrick Brest
  15. Arnaud Hubstenberger
  16. Hugues Roest Crollius
  17. Nancy Standart
  18. Dominique Weil  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Sorbonne Université, France
  2. Ecole Normale Supérieure, France
  3. Institut Curie, France
  4. Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, INSERM, France
  5. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Abstract

mRNA translation and decay appear often intimately linked although the rules of this interplay are poorly understood. In this study, we combined our recent P-body transcriptome with transcriptomes obtained following silencing of broadly acting mRNA decay and repression factors, and with available CLIP and related data. This revealed the central role of GC content in mRNA fate, in terms of P-body localization, mRNA translation and mRNA stability: P-bodies contain mostly AU-rich mRNAs, which have a particular codon usage associated with a low protein yield; AU-rich and GC-rich transcripts tend to follow distinct decay pathways; and the targets of sequence-specific RBPs and miRNAs are also biased in terms of GC content. Altogether, these results suggest an integrated view of post-transcriptional control in human cells where most translation regulation is dedicated to inefficiently translated AU-rich mRNAs, whereas control at the level of 5' decay applies to optimally translated GC-rich mRNAs.

Data availability

RNA-Seq gene data have been deposited in SRA under accession codes E-MTAB-4091 for the polysome profiling after DDX6 silencing, E-MTAB-5577 for the transcriptome after PAT1B silencing, and E-MTAB-5477 for the PB transcriptome, all in HEK293 cells.RNA-Seq gene data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE115471 and GSE114605 for the transcriptome after XRN1 silencing in HeLa and HCT116 cells, respectively.ENCODE datasets are available at https://www.encodeproject.org under accession codes ENCSR893EFU for the DDX6 eClip experiment, and ENCSR109IQO for the transcriptome after DDX6 silencing in K562 cells.All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the Supplementary file 1.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maïté Courel

    Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yves Clément

    Institut de Biologie de l'ENS, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5932-9412
  3. Clémentine Bossevain

    Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Dominika Foretek

    Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Olivia Vidal Cruchez

    IRCAN, FHU‐OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, INSERM, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Zhou Yi

    iBV, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, INSERM, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Marianne Bénard

    Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Marie‐Noëlle Benassy

    Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Michel Kress

    Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Caroline Vindry

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Michèle Ernoult-Lange

    Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Christophe Antoniewski

    ARTbio Bioinformatics Analysis Facility, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7709-2116
  13. Antonin Morillon

    Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0575-5264
  14. Patrick Brest

    IRCAN, FHU‐OncoAge, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, INSERM, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Arnaud Hubstenberger

    iBV, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, INSERM, Nice, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Hugues Roest Crollius

    Institut de Biologie de l'ENS, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8209-173X
  17. Nancy Standart

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Dominique Weil

    Laboratory of Developmental Biology, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    dominique.weil@upmc.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7630-1772

Funding

Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (Subvention Fixe)

  • Dominique Weil

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE09-0013-01)

  • Dominique Weil

European Research Council (DARK consolidator grant)

  • Antonin Morillon

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-LABX-0028-01)

  • Antonin Morillon

Canceropole PACA

  • Patrick Brest

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

  • Nancy Standart

Newton Trust and Foundation Wiener

  • Nancy Standart

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Courel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,788
    views
  • 1,287
    downloads
  • 147
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maïté Courel
  2. Yves Clément
  3. Clémentine Bossevain
  4. Dominika Foretek
  5. Olivia Vidal Cruchez
  6. Zhou Yi
  7. Marianne Bénard
  8. Marie‐Noëlle Benassy
  9. Michel Kress
  10. Caroline Vindry
  11. Michèle Ernoult-Lange
  12. Christophe Antoniewski
  13. Antonin Morillon
  14. Patrick Brest
  15. Arnaud Hubstenberger
  16. Hugues Roest Crollius
  17. Nancy Standart
  18. Dominique Weil
(2019)
GC content shapes mRNA storage and decay in human cells
eLife 8:e49708.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49708

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49708

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Neuroscience
    Robyn D Moir, Emilio Merheb ... Ian M Willis
    Research Article

    Pathogenic variants in subunits of RNA polymerase (Pol) III cause a spectrum of Polr3-related neurodegenerative diseases including 4H leukodystrophy. Disease onset occurs from infancy to early adulthood and is associated with a variable range and severity of neurological and non-neurological features. The molecular basis of Polr3-related disease pathogenesis is unknown. We developed a postnatal whole-body mouse model expressing pathogenic Polr3a mutations to examine the molecular mechanisms by which reduced Pol III transcription results primarily in central nervous system phenotypes. Polr3a mutant mice exhibit behavioral deficits, cerebral pathology and exocrine pancreatic atrophy. Transcriptome and immunohistochemistry analyses of cerebra during disease progression show a reduction in most Pol III transcripts, induction of innate immune and integrated stress responses and cell-type-specific gene expression changes reflecting neuron and oligodendrocyte loss and microglial activation. Earlier in the disease when integrated stress and innate immune responses are minimally induced, mature tRNA sequencing revealed a global reduction in tRNA levels and an altered tRNA profile but no changes in other Pol III transcripts. Thus, changes in the size and/or composition of the tRNA pool have a causal role in disease initiation. Our findings reveal different tissue- and brain region-specific sensitivities to a defect in Pol III transcription.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ting-Wen Chen, Hsiao-Wei Liao ... Chung-Te Chang
    Research Article

    The mRNA 5'-cap structure removal by the decapping enzyme DCP2 is a critical step in gene regulation. While DCP2 is the catalytic subunit in the decapping complex, its activity is strongly enhanced by multiple factors, particularly DCP1, which is the major activator in yeast. However, the precise role of DCP1 in metazoans has yet to be fully elucidated. Moreover, in humans, the specific biological functions of the two DCP1 paralogs, DCP1a and DCP1b, remain largely unknown. To investigate the role of human DCP1, we generated cell lines that were deficient in DCP1a, DCP1b, or both to evaluate the importance of DCP1 in the decapping machinery. Our results highlight the importance of human DCP1 in decapping process and show that the EVH1 domain of DCP1 enhances the mRNA-binding affinity of DCP2. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses outline the distinct functions of DCP1a and DCP1b in human cells, regulating specific endogenous mRNA targets and biological processes. Overall, our findings provide insights into the molecular mechanism of human DCP1 in mRNA decapping and shed light on the distinct functions of its paralogs.