Cue-inhibited ventrolateral periaqueductal gray neurons signal fear output and threat probability in male rats

  1. Kristina M Wright  Is a corresponding author
  2. Thomas C Jhou
  3. Daniel Pimpinelli
  4. Michael A McDannald  Is a corresponding author
  1. Boston College, United States

Abstract

The ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) is proposed to mediate fear responses to imminent danger. Previously we reported that vlPAG neurons showing short-latency increases in firing to danger cues - the presumed neural substrate for fear output - signal threat probability in male rats (Wright et al., 2019). Here, we scrutinize the activity of cue-inhibited vlPAG neurons that show decreases in firing to danger cues. One cue-inhibited population flipped danger activity from early inhibition to late excitation: a poor neural substrate for fear output, but a better substrate for threat timing. A second population showed differential firing with greatest inhibition to danger, less to uncertainty and no inhibition to safety. Differential firing by this second population reflected the pattern of fear output, and was observed throughout cue presentation. The results reveal an expected vlPAG signal for fear output in an unexpected, cue-inhibited population.

Data availability

Data have been deposited at: http://crcns.org/data-sets/bst/pag-1

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kristina M Wright

    Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States
    For correspondence
    wrightko@bc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1446-3009
  2. Thomas C Jhou

    Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8811-0156
  3. Daniel Pimpinelli

    Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michael A McDannald

    Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States
    For correspondence
    michael.mcdannald@bc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8525-1260

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01MH117791)

  • Michael A McDannald

National Institutes of Health (R00DA034010)

  • Michael A McDannald

National Science Foundation (5106201)

  • Kristina M Wright

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#2018-002) of Boston College. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Boston College. All surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Thorsten Kahnt, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: July 10, 2019
  2. Accepted: September 28, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 30, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 30, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Wright et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,091
    Page views
  • 162
    Downloads
  • 16
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kristina M Wright
  2. Thomas C Jhou
  3. Daniel Pimpinelli
  4. Michael A McDannald
(2019)
Cue-inhibited ventrolateral periaqueductal gray neurons signal fear output and threat probability in male rats
eLife 8:e50054.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50054

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Rebecca Elizabeth Carlisle, Arthur D Kuo
    Research Article Updated

    Humans make a number of choices when they walk, such as how fast and for how long. The preferred steady walking speed seems chosen to minimize energy expenditure per distance traveled. But the speed of actual walking bouts is not only steady, but rather a time-varying trajectory, which can also be modulated by task urgency or an individual’s movement vigor. Here we show that speed trajectories and durations of human walking bouts are explained better by an objective to minimize Energy and Time, meaning the total work or energy to reach destination, plus a cost proportional to bout duration. Applied to a computational model of walking dynamics, this objective predicts dynamic speed vs. time trajectories with inverted U shapes. Model and human experiment (N=10) show that shorter bouts are unsteady and dominated by the time and effort of accelerating, and longer ones are steadier and faster and dominated by steady-state time and effort. Individual-dependent vigor may be characterized by the energy one is willing to spend to save a unit of time, which explains why some may walk faster than others, but everyone may have similar-shaped trajectories due to similar walking dynamics. Tradeoffs between energy and time costs can predict transient, steady, and vigor-related aspects of walking.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    2. Neuroscience
    Nihav Dhawale, Madhusudhan Venkadesan
    Research Article Updated

    Running stably on uneven natural terrain takes skillful control and was critical for human evolution. Even as runners circumnavigate hazardous obstacles such as steep drops, they must contend with uneven ground that is gentler but still destabilizing. We do not know how footsteps are guided based on the uneven topography of the ground and how those choices influence stability. Therefore, we studied human runners on trail-like undulating uneven terrain and measured their energetics, kinematics, ground forces, and stepping patterns. We find that runners do not selectively step on more level ground areas. Instead, the body’s mechanical response, mediated by the control of leg compliance, helps maintain stability without requiring precise regulation of footsteps. Furthermore, their overall kinematics and energy consumption on uneven terrain showed little change from flat ground. These findings may explain how runners remain stable on natural terrain while devoting attention to tasks besides guiding footsteps.