Organic electrochemical transistor arrays for real-time mapping of evoked neurotransmitter release in vivo

  1. Kai Xie
  2. Naixiang Wang
  3. Xudong Lin
  4. Zixun Wang
  5. Xi Zhao
  6. Peilin Fang
  7. Haibing Yue
  8. Junhwi Kim
  9. Jing Luo
  10. Shaoyang Cui
  11. Feng Yan  Is a corresponding author
  12. Peng Shi  Is a corresponding author
  1. City University of Hong Kong, China
  2. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
  3. City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  4. Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, China

Abstract

Though neurotransmitters are essential in neural signal transmission, techniques for in vivo analysis are still limited. Here, we describe an organic electrochemical transistor array (OECT-array) technique for monitoring catecholamine neurotransmitters (CA-NTs) in rat brains. The OECT-array is an active sensor with intrinsic amplification capability, allowing real-time and direct readout of transient CA-NT release with a sensitivity of nanomolar range and a temporal resolution of several milliseconds. The device has a working voltage lower than half of that typically used in a prevalent cyclic voltammetry measurement, and operates continuously in vivo for hours without significant signal drift, which is inaccessible for existing methods. With the OECT-array, we demonstrate simultaneous mapping of evoked dopamine release at multiple striatal brain regions in different physiological scenarios, and reveal a complex cross-talk between mesolimbic and nigrostriatal pathways, which is heterogeneously affected by the reciprocal innervation between ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra pars compacta.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided as supplementary files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kai Xie

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Naixiang Wang

    Department of Applied Physics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Xudong Lin

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Zixun Wang

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xi Zhao

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Peilin Fang

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Haibing Yue

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Junhwi Kim

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jing Luo

    Department of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Shaoyang Cui

    Department of Rehabilitation, Shenzhen Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Feng Yan

    Department of Applied Physics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    For correspondence
    apafyan@polyu.edu.hk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Peng Shi

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
    For correspondence
    pengshi@cityu.edu.hk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0629-4161

Funding

General Research Funds (11278616)

  • Peng Shi

General Research Funds (11218015)

  • Peng Shi

General Research Funds (11203017)

  • Peng Shi

Health and Medical Research Fund (06172336)

  • Peng Shi

Collaborative Research Funds (C5015-15G)

  • Feng Yan
  • Peng Shi

The funders provided resources for the study design, data collection, and interpretation.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the university Animal Ethics Committee. Animal licenses, (16-97) in DH/HA&P/8/2/5 Pt.5 and (18-129) in DH/SHS/8/2/5 Pt.4, were approved by Department of Health of the Government of Hong Kong Special Administration Region.

Copyright

© 2020, Xie et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,039
    views
  • 836
    downloads
  • 66
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kai Xie
  2. Naixiang Wang
  3. Xudong Lin
  4. Zixun Wang
  5. Xi Zhao
  6. Peilin Fang
  7. Haibing Yue
  8. Junhwi Kim
  9. Jing Luo
  10. Shaoyang Cui
  11. Feng Yan
  12. Peng Shi
(2020)
Organic electrochemical transistor arrays for real-time mapping of evoked neurotransmitter release in vivo
eLife 9:e50345.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50345

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50345

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Shraddha KC, Kenny H Nguyen ... Thomas C Boothby
    Research Article

    The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.