The orphan receptor GPR88 blunts the signaling of opioid receptors and multiple striatal GPCRs

  1. Thibaut Laboute
  2. Jorge Gandía
  3. Lucie P Pellissier
  4. Yannick Corde
  5. Florian Rebeillard
  6. Maria Gallo
  7. Christophe Gauthier
  8. Audrey Léauté
  9. Jorge Diaz
  10. Anne Poupon
  11. Brigitte L Kieffer
  12. Julie Le Merrer  Is a corresponding author
  13. Jérôme AJ Becker  Is a corresponding author
  1. INRA UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, Inserm, France
  2. Inserm, France
  3. Pompeu Fabra University, Spain
  4. McGill University, Canada

Abstract

GPR88 is an orphan G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) considered as a promising therapeutic target for neuropsychiatric disorders; its pharmacology, however, remains scarcely understood. Based on our previous report of increased delta opioid receptor activity in Gpr88 null mice, we investigated the impact of GPR88 co-expression on the signaling of opioid receptors in vitro and revealed that GPR88 inhibits the activation of both their G protein- and b-arrestin-dependent signaling pathways. In Gpr88 knockout mice, morphine-induced locomotor sensitization, withdrawal and supra-spinal analgesia were facilitated, consistent with a tonic inhibitory action of GPR88 on µOR signaling. We then explored GPR88 interactions with more striatal versus non-neuronal GPCRs, and revealed that GPR88 can decrease the G protein-dependent signaling of most receptors in close proximity, but impedes b-arrestin recruitment by all receptors tested. Our study unravels an unsuspected buffering role of GPR88 expression on GPCR signaling, with intriguing consequences for opioid and striatal functions.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Thibaut Laboute

    Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRA UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, Inserm, Nouzilly, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0870-1891
  2. Jorge Gandía

    Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRA UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, Inserm, Nouzilly, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1711-8075
  3. Lucie P Pellissier

    Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRA UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, Inserm, Nouzilly, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yannick Corde

    Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRA UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, Inserm, Nouzilly, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Florian Rebeillard

    Cellular Biology and Molecular Pharmacology of Central Receptors, Inserm, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Maria Gallo

    Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Christophe Gauthier

    Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRA UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, Inserm, Nouzilly, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Audrey Léauté

    Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRA UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, Inserm, Nouzilly, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jorge Diaz

    Cellular Biology and Molecular Pharmacology of Central Receptors, Inserm, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Anne Poupon

    Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRA UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, Inserm, Nouzilly, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Brigitte L Kieffer

    Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8809-8334
  12. Julie Le Merrer

    Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRA UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, Inserm, Nouzilly, France
    For correspondence
    julie.le-merrer@inra.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jérôme AJ Becker

    Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, INRA UMR-0085, CNRS UMR-7247, Université de Tours, Inserm, Nouzilly, France
    For correspondence
    jerome.becker@inra.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0039-0067

Funding

Region Centre-Val de Loire (ARD2020 Biomedicaments - GPCRAb)

  • Julie Le Merrer
  • Jérôme AJ Becker

LabEX MAbImprove

  • Julie Le Merrer
  • Jérôme AJ Becker

Fonds Unique Interministériel (ATHOS)

  • Brigitte L Kieffer
  • Julie Le Merrer
  • Jérôme AJ Becker

Marie-Curie/AgreeSkills Program (Postdoctoral Fellowshio)

  • Lucie P Pellissier

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive 2010/63/EU and approved by the Comité d'Ethique pour l'Expérimentation Animale de l'ICS et de l'IGBMC (Com'Eth, 2012-047)

Copyright

© 2020, Laboute et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,440
    views
  • 660
    downloads
  • 26
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Thibaut Laboute
  2. Jorge Gandía
  3. Lucie P Pellissier
  4. Yannick Corde
  5. Florian Rebeillard
  6. Maria Gallo
  7. Christophe Gauthier
  8. Audrey Léauté
  9. Jorge Diaz
  10. Anne Poupon
  11. Brigitte L Kieffer
  12. Julie Le Merrer
  13. Jérôme AJ Becker
(2020)
The orphan receptor GPR88 blunts the signaling of opioid receptors and multiple striatal GPCRs
eLife 9:e50519.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50519

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50519

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Beibei Liu ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    Distal appendages are nine-fold symmetric blade-like structures attached to the distal end of the mother centriole. These structures are critical for formation of the primary cilium, by regulating at least four critical steps: ciliary vesicle recruitment, recruitment and initiation of intraflagellar transport (IFT), and removal of CP110. While specific proteins that localize to the distal appendages have been identified, how exactly each protein functions to achieve the multiple roles of the distal appendages is poorly understood. Here we comprehensively analyze known and newly discovered distal appendage proteins (CEP83, SCLT1, CEP164, TTBK2, FBF1, CEP89, KIZ, ANKRD26, PIDD1, LRRC45, NCS1, CEP15) for their precise localization, order of recruitment, and their roles in each step of cilia formation. Using CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts, we show that the order of the recruitment of the distal appendage proteins is highly interconnected and a more complex hierarchy. Our analysis highlights two protein modules, CEP83-SCLT1 and CEP164-TTBK2, as critical for structural assembly of distal appendages. Functional assays revealed that CEP89 selectively functions in RAB34+ ciliary vesicle recruitment, while deletion of the integral components, CEP83-SCLT1-CEP164-TTBK2, severely compromised all four steps of cilium formation. Collectively, our analyses provide a more comprehensive view of the organization and the function of the distal appendage, paving the way for molecular understanding of ciliary assembly.