Modular transcriptional programs separately define axon and dendrite connectivity

  1. Yerbol Z Kurmangaliyev
  2. Juyoun Yoo
  3. Samuel A LoCascio
  4. S Lawrence Zipursky  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  2. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
7 figures, 1 table and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Single-cell sequencing reveals eight transcriptionally distinct populations of T4/T5 neurons.

(A) Common morphology of a T4/T5 neuron, with axon and dendrite wiring pattern variations in parentheses. (B) Arrangement of the eight T4/T5 subtypes in the optic lobe. Each subtype is defined by a combination of one dendrite (M10 or Lo1) and one axon (LoP a, b, c, or d) wiring pattern. (C) A single T4a neuron (green) with dendrites in M10 (asterisk) and axon terminal in LoP layer a (arrowhead). All T4/T5 neurons labeled in magenta. Scale bar, 20 μm. (D–F) Single-cell sequencing of T4/T5 neurons at 48 hr APF. Unsupervised analysis revealed eight distinct transcriptional clusters. (D) T4/T5 neurons were labeled with nuclear GFP, purified by FACS and used for single-cell RNA-Seq. (E) t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) plot of 3557 single-cell transcriptomes. Clusters are color-coded according to subtype identity based on following results. Cell numbers are displayed for each cluster. See also Figure 1—figure supplement 1. (F) Heatmap of expression patterns of cluster-enriched genes (‘one versus all’, see Materials and methods). Cells (rows) grouped by cluster identities as in (E). Genes (columns) are ordered by similarity of their expression patterns. Scaled expression levels are indicated, as in scale.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.002
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
T4/T5 neurons robustly cluster into eight transcriptionally distinct populations (48 hr APF).

(A) Principal component analysis (PCA). (B) Independent component analysis (ICA). Distributions of cells along eight principal components (PCs) and eight independent components (ICs). (C) tSNE plots based on IC 1–3 (left), IC 1–8 (middle), PC 1–8 (right). Cells are color coded according to the final clustering results based on IC 1–3, as in Figure 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.003
Three primary axes of transcriptional diversity define eight T4/T5 populations.

(A) Three independent components (ICs, henceforth Axis 1, 2, 3) separate cells into approximate halves. Histograms (bottom) and 1-D scatterplots (top) show the distributions of cells along each axis. Cells are grouped into rows based on cluster identities. ICs/Axes are ordered according to following results. Clusters are color-coded as in Figure 1E. See also Figure 1—figure supplement 1. (B) 3-D scatterplot of the distributions of cells along the three ICs/Axes. (C) Heatmaps of expression patterns of the top 15 genes with highest contribution (loading) to each IC/Axis. Cells (columns) are ordered according to a score for each IC/Axis. Genes (rows) are ordered according to the contribution to each IC/Axis. Scaled expression levels are indicated, as in scale. Axes ordered as in (A). (D) 3-D scatterplots with expression patterns of transcription factors (TFs) with highest contribution to each IC/Axis. Normalized expression levels are indicated by color, as in scale. Axes are arranged as in (B).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.004
Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Primary axes of transcriptional diversity define groups of T4/T5 subtypes with shared wiring patterns.

(A–A”) 1-D scatterplots show distribution of cells along Axis 1, 2, and 3 for each cluster. Normalized expression levels are indicated by color, as in scale. (B–B”) In vivo expression of marker genes for each axis at 48 hr APF. Fas2 labels LoP layers a/b, klg labels LoP layers c/d, beat-IV and grn label LoP layers b/c, dpr2 and beat-VI label M10 but not Lo1. Scale bars, 20 μm. Sets of positive clusters in (A) are matched to specific sets of T4/T5 subtypes based on in vivo expression patterns in (B). Individual cluster identities are deduced based on combination of expression patterns. For example, T4a is Fas2+ (a/b), beat-IV- (not b/c), dpr2+ (M10). (C–C”) Schematic of wiring patterns of T4/T5 subtypes corresponding to the expression patterns of marker genes (red). See also Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.005
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Expression patterns of known marker genes for a/b and c/d subtypes along Axis 1 at 48 hr APF.

See legend of Figure 3 for details.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.006
Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Transcriptional program of a single T4/T5 subtype.

Pairwise comparisons between T4a and other subtypes (‘one versus one’, see Materials and methods) that differ by either axonal outputs (A–C), or dendritic inputs (D). For each comparison, insets indicate morphologies (upper left) and cluster distributions along axes of transcriptional diversity (lower left). Expression patterns of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for each pairwise comparison are shown in upper right. Dot size indicates the percentage of cells in which the DEG was detected, color represents average scaled expression, as in scale. Genes are ordered by fold-change values. Top 20 DEGs are shown for (A) and (B). Expression patterns of DEGs among all eight subtypes are shown in lower right. See also Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.007
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Pairwise comparisons between T4a and subtypes that differ by both axonal outputs and dendritic inputs.

Top 20 DEGs are shown for each comparison. See legend of Figure 4 for details.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.008
Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Dynamics of T4/T5 transcriptional programs during development.

Distributions of normalized expression levels of TFs (A) and selected families of CSPs (B-D) at 24 hr and 48 hr APF. Distributions for each subtype are color-coded as in Figure 1. See also Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.009
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Single-cell profiling of T4/T5 neurons at 24 hr APF.

Unsupervised analysis revealed eight transcriptionally distinct populations. (A) tSNE plot of 3833 single-cell transcriptomes. (B). Distribution of cells along three primary axes of transcriptional diversity, and expression patterns of TF with highest contribution to each axis. See legends of Figures 13 for details.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.010
Figure 6 with 2 supplements
grn controls sublamination of T4/T5 axons into inner and outer LoP layers.

(A) Schematic of grn+ (red) T4/T5 subtypes in wild-type optic lobe. grn expression defines inner LoP layer subtypes. See also Figure 6—figure supplement 1. (B) grn RNAi and grn overexpression in all T4/T5 neurons specifically disrupts sublamination of a/b (Con-) and c/d (Con+) LoP subdomains into inner and outer layers. Insets depict LoP phenotypes. (C–D) Immunostaining for Death caspase-1 (Dcp-1) reveals increased apoptotic T4/T5 neurons under grn RNAi and overexpression (UAS-grn) conditions at 30 hr APF. See also Figure 6—figure supplement 2, and Figure 6—source data 1. (E) Ectopic expression of p35 in T4/T5 neurons (UAS-p35) rescues apoptotic cell death associated with overexpression of grn. (F) grn overexpression specifically disrupts axon sublamination when apoptosis is blocked. Statistical significance assessed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (**p<0.01, ***p<0.001). Bars and whiskers represent mean and standard deviation. Dots represent values for individual optic lobes.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.011
Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Sequential lamination of T4/T5 axons and four LoP layers.

23G12-Gal4 drives membrane localized RFP (grey) and nuclear localized GFP (green) in all T4/T5 neurons throughout pupal development.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.012
Figure 6—figure supplement 2
grn RNAi and grn overexpression cause significant loss of T4/T5 neurons between 24 and 48 hr APF.

Statistical significance assessed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (**p<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.013
Figure 7 with 2 supplements
Modular transcription factor codes define eight T4/T5 subtypes.

A common T4/T5 regulatory program is defined by TFs expressed in all subtypes (Davie et al., 2018; Konstantinides et al., 2018; Contreras et al., 2018; Schilling et al., 2019). This program is diversified by modular combinations of feature-specific TFs defining unique wiring patterns of eight T4/T5 subtypes. Dot size indicates the percentage of cells in which the TF was detected, color represents average scaled expression, as in scale. Data shown for 48 hr APF. See also Figure 7—figure supplements 1 and 2.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.015
Figure 7—figure supplement 1
Expression patterns of TFs at 24 hr APF.

See Figure 7 legend for details.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.016
Figure 7—figure supplement 2
Expression patterns of subtype-enriched CSPs with cell adhesion domains.

Expression patterns of subtype-enriched CSPs with cell adhesion domains (e.g. Ig and LRR). Expression patterns are shown for 24 hr and 48 hr APF. CSPs are ordered by similarity of their expression patterns. See Figure 7 legend for details.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822.017

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type
(species) or resource
DesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional
information
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)MCFO-1 (pBPhsFLP2::PEST;+; UAS-FSF-smGdP::HA_V5_FLAG)PMID: 25964354RRID: BDSC_64085Gift from Aljoscha Nern and Gerald Rubin
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)10XUAS-IVS-myr::tdTomatoBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_32222
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)23G12-GAL4 (T4/T5)Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_49044T4/T5 driver
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)42F06-GAL4 (T4/T5)Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_41253T4/T5 driver
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)23G12-LexA (T4/T5)Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_65044T4/T5 driver
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster){R59E08-p65ADZp (attP40); R42F06-ZpGdbd (attP2)} (T4/T5 splitGAL4)PMID: 28384470JRC_SS00324
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-CD4-tdGFPBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_35839
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-H2A::GFPPMID: 26687360N/AGift from Barret Pfeiffer and Gerald Rubin
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)LexAop-myr::tdTomatoPMID: 24462095N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)10XUAS-IVS-myr::GFPBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_32197
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)10XUAS-IVS-mCD8::RFPBloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_32219
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Mi{PT-GFSTF.1}klg[MI02135-GFSTF.1]Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_59787
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Mi{PT-GFSTF.1}beat-IV[MI05715-GFSTF.1]Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_66506
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)dpr2-Gal4Hugo J. BellenN/AGift from Hugo J. Bellen
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)P{w[+mW.hs]=GawB}grn[05930-GAL4]Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_42224
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)Mi{y[+mDint2]=MIC}beat-VI[MI13252]Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_58680
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)P{y[+t7.7] v[+t1.8]=TRiP.HMS01085}attP2Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_33746UAS-grnRNAi
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)P{UAS-p35.H}BH1Bloomington Drosophila Stock CenterRRID: BDSC_5072
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-grn.ORF.3xHAFlyORFStock #: F001916
AntibodyChicken polyclonal anti-GFPAbcamCat. #: ab13970
RRID: AB_300798
IHC (1:1000)
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-dsRedClontechCat. #: 632496
RRID: AB_10013483
IHC (1:200)
AntibodyMouse monoclonal anti-BrpDevelopmental Studies Hybridoma BankCat. #: nc82
RRID: AB_2314866
IHC (1:20)
AntibodyMouse monoclonal anti-V5AbcamCat. #: ab27671
RRID: AB_471093
IHC (1:300)
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-Dcp-1Cell SignallingCat. #: 9578
RRID: AB_2721060
IHC (1:50)
AntibodyGoat polyclonal anti-chicken IgY Alexa Fluor 488InvitrogenCat. #: A11039
RRID: AB_142924
IHC (1:200)
AntibodyGoat polyclonal anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 488InvitrogenCat. #: A11029
RRID: AB_138404
IHC (1:500)
AntibodyGoat monoclonal anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 568InvitrogenCat. #: A11011
RRID: AB_143157
IHC (1:200)
AntibodyGoat polyclonal anti-rat IgG Alexa
Fluor 568
InvitrogenCat. #: A11077
RRID: AB_141874
IHC (1:500)
AntibodyGoat oligoclonal anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 647InvitrogenCat. #: A27040
RRID: AB_2536101
IHC (1:200)
AntibodyDonkey polyclonal anti-mouse IgG Cy5Jackson ImmunoResearch LaboratoriesCat. #: 715-175-150
RRID: AB_2340819
IHC (1:200)
Chemical compound, drugPapainWorthingtonCat. #: LK003178
Chemical compound, drugLiberase proteaseSigma-AldrichCat. #: 5401119001
Software, algorithmCell Ranger 2.2.0https://10xgenomics.comRRID:SCR_017344
Software, algorithmSeurat 2.3.4https://satijalab.org/seurat/RRID: SCR_016341

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yerbol Z Kurmangaliyev
  2. Juyoun Yoo
  3. Samuel A LoCascio
  4. S Lawrence Zipursky
(2019)
Modular transcriptional programs separately define axon and dendrite connectivity
eLife 8:e50822.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50822