Stochastic yield catastrophes and robustness in self-assembly

  1. Florian M Gartner
  2. Isabella R Graf
  3. Patrick Wilke
  4. Philipp M Geiger
  5. Erwin Frey  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany

Abstract

A guiding principle in self-assembly is that, for high production yield, nucleation of structures must be significantly slower than their growth. However, details of the mechanism that impedes nucleation are broadly considered irrelevant. Here, we analyze self-assembly into finite-sized target structures employing mathematical modeling. We investigate two key scenarios to delay nucleation: (i) by introducing a slow activation step for the assembling constituents and, (ii) by decreasing the dimerization rate. These scenarios have widely different characteristics. While the dimerization scenario exhibits robust behavior, the activation scenario is highly sensitive to demographic fluctuations. These demographic fluctuations ultimately disfavor growth compared to nucleation and can suppress yield completely. The occurrence of this stochastic yield catastrophe does not depend on model details but is generic as soon as number fluctuations between constituents are taken into account. On a broader perspective, our results reveal that stochasticity is an important limiting factor for self-assembly and that the specific implementation of the nucleation process plays a significant role in determining the yield.

Data availability

All data was generated from stochastic simulations in C++ and deterministic simulations in Matlab. The Source File Codes are uploaded with the manuscript files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Florian M Gartner

    Arnold-Sommerfeld-Center for Theoretial Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Isabella R Graf

    Arnold-Sommerfeld-Center for Theoretial Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Patrick Wilke

    Arnold-Sommerfeld-Center for Theoretial Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Philipp M Geiger

    Arnold-Sommerfeld-Center for Theoretial Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Erwin Frey

    Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
    For correspondence
    frey@lmu.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8792-3358

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK2062)

  • Patrick Wilke

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (QBM)

  • Florian M Gartner
  • Isabella R Graf

Aspen Center for Physics (PHY-160761)

  • Erwin Frey

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC-2094 - 390783311)

  • Erwin Frey

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Gartner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,985
    views
  • 323
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Florian M Gartner
  2. Isabella R Graf
  3. Patrick Wilke
  4. Philipp M Geiger
  5. Erwin Frey
(2020)
Stochastic yield catastrophes and robustness in self-assembly
eLife 9:e51020.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51020

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51020

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Jake Turley, Isaac V Chenchiah ... Helen Weavers
    Tools and Resources

    Cell division is fundamental to all healthy tissue growth, as well as being rate-limiting in the tissue repair response to wounding and during cancer progression. However, the role that cell divisions play in tissue growth is a collective one, requiring the integration of many individual cell division events. It is particularly difficult to accurately detect and quantify multiple features of large numbers of cell divisions (including their spatio-temporal synchronicity and orientation) over extended periods of time. It would thus be advantageous to perform such analyses in an automated fashion, which can naturally be enabled using deep learning. Hence, we develop a pipeline of deep learning models that accurately identify dividing cells in time-lapse movies of epithelial tissues in vivo. Our pipeline also determines their axis of division orientation, as well as their shape changes before and after division. This strategy enables us to analyse the dynamic profile of cell divisions within the Drosophila pupal wing epithelium, both as it undergoes developmental morphogenesis and as it repairs following laser wounding. We show that the division axis is biased according to lines of tissue tension and that wounding triggers a synchronised (but not oriented) burst of cell divisions back from the leading edge.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Alex James, Franca Buelow ... Ann Brower
    Short Report

    We use data from 30 countries and find that the more women in a discipline, the lower quality the research in that discipline is evaluated to be and the lower the funding success rate is. This affects men and women, and is robust to age, number of research outputs, and bibliometric measures where such data are available. Our work builds on others’ findings that women’s work is valued less, regardless of who performs that work.