A neurobiological association of revenge propensity during intergroup conflict

  1. Xiaochun Han
  2. Michele J Gelfand
  3. Bing Wu
  4. Ting Zhang
  5. Wenxin Li
  6. Tianyu Gao
  7. Chenyu Pang
  8. Taoyu Wu
  9. Yuqing Zhou
  10. Shuai Zhou
  11. Xinhuai Wu  Is a corresponding author
  12. Shihui Han  Is a corresponding author
  1. Peking University, China
  2. University of Maryland, United States
  3. Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, China

Abstract

Revenge during intergroup conflict is a human universal, but its neurobiological underpinnings remain unclear. We address this by integrating functional MRI and measurements of endogenous oxytocin in participants who view an ingroup and an outgroup member's suffering that is caused mutually (Revenge group) or respectively by a computer (Control group). We show that intergroup conflict encountered by the Revenge group is associated with an increased level of oxytocin in saliva compared to in the Control group. Furthermore, the medial prefrontal activity in response to ingroup pain in the Revenge but not Control group mediates the association between endogenous oxytocin and the propensity to give painful electric shocks to outgroup members regardless of whether they were directly involved in the conflict. Our findings highlight an important neurobiological correlate of revenge propensity which may be implicated in conflict contagion across individuals in the context of intergroup conflict.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed for figures of this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 2-6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xiaochun Han

    School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Michele J Gelfand

    Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bing Wu

    Radiology, Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ting Zhang

    School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Wenxin Li

    School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tianyu Gao

    School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chenyu Pang

    School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Taoyu Wu

    School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Yuqing Zhou

    School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Shuai Zhou

    Radiology, Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xinhuai Wu

    Radiology, Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    bei925@sina.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Shihui Han

    School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    shan@pku.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3350-5104

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31661143039)

  • Shihui Han

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent was obtained prior to the experiment. All participants were paid for their participation. This study was approved by the local ethics committee at the School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University.(#2015-12-04)

Copyright

© 2020, Han et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,120
    views
  • 411
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xiaochun Han
  2. Michele J Gelfand
  3. Bing Wu
  4. Ting Zhang
  5. Wenxin Li
  6. Tianyu Gao
  7. Chenyu Pang
  8. Taoyu Wu
  9. Yuqing Zhou
  10. Shuai Zhou
  11. Xinhuai Wu
  12. Shihui Han
(2020)
A neurobiological association of revenge propensity during intergroup conflict
eLife 9:e52014.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52014

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52014

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Simonas Griesius, Amy Richardson, Dimitri Michael Kullmann
    Research Article

    Non-linear summation of synaptic inputs to the dendrites of pyramidal neurons has been proposed to increase the computation capacity of neurons through coincidence detection, signal amplification, and additional logic operations such as XOR. Supralinear dendritic integration has been documented extensively in principal neurons, mediated by several voltage-dependent conductances. It has also been reported in parvalbumin-positive hippocampal basket cells, in dendrites innervated by feedback excitatory synapses. Whether other interneurons, which support feed-forward or feedback inhibition of principal neuron dendrites, also exhibit local non-linear integration of synaptic excitation is not known. Here, we use patch-clamp electrophysiology, and two-photon calcium imaging and glutamate uncaging, to show that supralinear dendritic integration of near-synchronous spatially clustered glutamate-receptor mediated depolarization occurs in NDNF-positive neurogliaform cells and oriens-lacunosum moleculare interneurons in the mouse hippocampus. Supralinear summation was detected via recordings of somatic depolarizations elicited by uncaging of glutamate on dendritic fragments, and, in neurogliaform cells, by concurrent imaging of dendritic calcium transients. Supralinearity was abolished by blocking NMDA receptors (NMDARs) but resisted blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels. Blocking L-type calcium channels abolished supralinear calcium signalling but only had a minor effect on voltage supralinearity. Dendritic boosting of spatially clustered synaptic signals argues for previously unappreciated computational complexity in dendrite-projecting inhibitory cells of the hippocampus.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jessica Royer, Valeria Kebets ... Boris C Bernhardt
    Research Article Updated

    Complex structural and functional changes occurring in typical and atypical development necessitate multidimensional approaches to better understand the risk of developing psychopathology. Here, we simultaneously examined structural and functional brain network patterns in relation to dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) dataset. Several components were identified, recapitulating the psychopathology hierarchy, with the general psychopathology (p) factor explaining most covariance with multimodal imaging features, while the internalizing, externalizing, and neurodevelopmental dimensions were each associated with distinct morphological and functional connectivity signatures. Connectivity signatures associated with the p factor and neurodevelopmental dimensions followed the sensory-to-transmodal axis of cortical organization, which is related to the emergence of complex cognition and risk for psychopathology. Results were consistent in two separate data subsamples and robust to variations in analytical parameters. Although model parameters yielded statistically significant brain–behavior associations in unseen data, generalizability of the model was rather limited for all three latent components (r change from within- to out-of-sample statistics: LC1within = 0.36, LC1out = 0.03; LC2within = 0.34, LC2out = 0.05; LC3within = 0.35, LC3out = 0.07). Our findings help in better understanding biological mechanisms underpinning dimensions of psychopathology, and could provide brain-based vulnerability markers.