Single cell analysis reveals human cytomegalovirus drives latently infected cells towards an anergic-like monocyte state

  1. Miri Shnayder
  2. Aharon Nachshon
  3. Batsheva Rozman
  4. Biana Bernshtein
  5. Michael Lavi
  6. Noam Fein
  7. Emma Poole
  8. Selmir Avdic
  9. Emily Blyth
  10. David Gottlieb
  11. Allison Abendroth
  12. Barry Slobedman
  13. John Sinclair
  14. Noam Stern-Ginossar  Is a corresponding author
  15. Michal Schwartz  Is a corresponding author
  1. Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
  2. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  3. Sydney Cellular Therapies Laboratory, Australia
  4. University of Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) causes a lifelong infection through establishment of latency. Although reactivation from latency can cause life-threatening disease, our molecular understanding of HCMV latency is incomplete. Here we use single cell RNA-seq analysis to characterize latency in monocytes and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). In monocytes, we identify host cell surface markers that enable enrichment of latent cells harboring higher viral transcript levels, which can reactivate more efficiently, and are characterized by reduced intrinsic immune response that is important for viral gene expression. Significantly, in latent HSPCs, viral transcripts could be detected only in monocyte progenitors and were also associated with reduced immune-response. Overall, our work indicates that regardless of the developmental stage in which HCMV infects, HCMV drives hematopoietic cells towards a weaker immune-responsive monocyte state and that this anergic-like state is crucial for the virus ability to express its transcripts and to eventually reactivate.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE138838

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Miri Shnayder

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Aharon Nachshon

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Batsheva Rozman

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Biana Bernshtein

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Michael Lavi

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Noam Fein

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Emma Poole

    Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3904-6121
  8. Selmir Avdic

    Sydney Cellular Therapies Laboratory, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Emily Blyth

    Sydney Cellular Therapies Laboratory, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. David Gottlieb

    Sydney Cellular Therapies Laboratory, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Allison Abendroth

    Discipline of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Barry Slobedman

    Discipline of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9431-6094
  13. John Sinclair

    Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Noam Stern-Ginossar

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    For correspondence
    noam.stern-ginossar@weizmann.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3583-5932
  15. Michal Schwartz

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    For correspondence
    michalsc@weizmann.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5442-0201

Funding

Infect-ERA (TANKACY)

  • Noam Stern-Ginossar

H2020 European Research Council (starting grant (StG-2014-638142))

  • Noam Stern-Ginossar

Cambridge NIHR BRC Cell Phenotyping Hub

  • John Sinclair

British Medical Research Council (G0701279)

  • John Sinclair

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All fresh peripheral blood samples were obtained after approval of protocols bythe Weizmann Institutional Review Board (IRB application 92-1). Informed written consent was obtained from all volunteers, and all experiments were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines. The study using HSCT recipient samples was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Sydney and the Western Sydney Local Health District. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to enrolment in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Melanie M Brinkmann, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: September 24, 2019
  2. Accepted: January 21, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 22, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 24, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: July 16, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Shnayder et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,008
    Page views
  • 579
    Downloads
  • 30
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Miri Shnayder
  2. Aharon Nachshon
  3. Batsheva Rozman
  4. Biana Bernshtein
  5. Michael Lavi
  6. Noam Fein
  7. Emma Poole
  8. Selmir Avdic
  9. Emily Blyth
  10. David Gottlieb
  11. Allison Abendroth
  12. Barry Slobedman
  13. John Sinclair
  14. Noam Stern-Ginossar
  15. Michal Schwartz
(2020)
Single cell analysis reveals human cytomegalovirus drives latently infected cells towards an anergic-like monocyte state
eLife 9:e52168.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52168

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Valentin Wernet, Marius Kriegler ... Reinhard Fischer
    Research Article Updated

    Communication is crucial for organismic interactions, from bacteria, to fungi, to humans. Humans may use the visual sense to monitor the environment before starting acoustic interactions. In comparison, fungi, lacking a visual system, rely on a cell-to-cell dialogue based on secreted signaling molecules to coordinate cell fusion and establish hyphal networks. Within this dialogue, hyphae alternate between sending and receiving signals. This pattern can be visualized via the putative signaling protein Soft (SofT), and the mitogen-activated protein kinase MAK-2 (MakB) which are recruited in an alternating oscillatory manner to the respective cytoplasmic membrane or nuclei of interacting hyphae. Here, we show that signal oscillations already occur in single hyphae of Arthrobotrys flagrans in the absence of potential fusion partners (cell monologue). They were in the same phase as growth oscillations. In contrast to the anti-phasic oscillations observed during the cell dialogue, SofT and MakB displayed synchronized oscillations in phase during the monologue. Once two fusion partners came into each other’s vicinity, their oscillation frequencies slowed down (entrainment phase) and transit into anti-phasic synchronization of the two cells’ oscillations with frequencies of 104±28 s and 117±19 s, respectively. Single-cell oscillations, transient entrainment, and anti-phasic oscillations were reproduced by a mathematical model where nearby hyphae can absorb and secrete a limited molecular signaling component into a shared extracellular space. We show that intracellular Ca2+ concentrations oscillate in two approaching hyphae, and depletion of Ca2+ from the medium affected vesicle-driven extension of the hyphal tip, abolished the cell monologue and the anti-phasic synchronization of two hyphae. Our results suggest that single hyphae engage in a ‘monologue’ that may be used for exploration of the environment and can dynamically shift their extracellular signaling systems into a ‘dialogue’ to initiate hyphal fusion.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Juan Xiang, Chaoyang Fan ... Pei Xu
    Research Article Updated

    The relative positions of viral DNA genomes to the host intranuclear environment play critical roles in determining virus fate. Recent advances in the application of chromosome conformation capture-based sequencing analysis (3 C technologies) have revealed valuable aspects of the spatiotemporal interplay of viral genomes with host chromosomes. However, to elucidate the causal relationship between the subnuclear localization of viral genomes and the pathogenic outcome of an infection, manipulative tools are needed. Rapid repositioning of viral DNAs to specific subnuclear compartments amid infection is a powerful approach to synchronize and interrogate this dynamically changing process in space and time. Herein, we report an inducible CRISPR-based two-component platform that relocates extrachromosomal DNA pieces (5 kb to 170 kb) to the nuclear periphery in minutes (CRISPR-nuPin). Based on this strategy, investigations of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), a prototypical member of the human herpesvirus family, revealed unprecedently reported insights into the early intranuclear life of the pathogen: (I) Viral genomes tethered to the nuclear periphery upon entry, compared with those freely infecting the nucleus, were wrapped around histones with increased suppressive modifications and subjected to stronger transcriptional silencing and prominent growth inhibition. (II) Relocating HSV-1 genomes at 1 hr post infection significantly promoted the transcription of viral genes, termed an ‘Escaping’ effect. (III) Early accumulation of ICP0 was a sufficient but not necessary condition for ‘Escaping’. (IV) Subnuclear localization was only critical during early infection. Importantly, the CRISPR-nuPin tactic, in principle, is applicable to many other DNA viruses.