Cortical RORβ is required for layer 4 transcriptional identity and barrel integrity

  1. Erin A Clark  Is a corresponding author
  2. Michael Rutlin
  3. Lucia Capano
  4. Samuel Aviles
  5. Jordan R Saadon
  6. Praveen Taneja
  7. Qiyu Zhang
  8. James B Bullis
  9. Timothy Lauer
  10. Emma Myers
  11. Anton Schulmann
  12. Douglas Forrest
  13. Sacha B Nelson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Brandeis University, United States
  2. Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
  3. National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, United States

Abstract

Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor Beta (RORβ) is a transcription factor (TF) and marker of layer 4 (L4) neurons, which are distinctive both in transcriptional identity and the ability to form aggregates such as barrels in rodent somatosensory cortex. However, the relationship between transcriptional identity and L4 cytoarchitecture is largely unknown. We find RORβ is required in the cortex for L4 aggregation into barrels and thalamocortical afferent (TCA) segregation. Interestingly, barrel organization also degrades with age in wildtype mice. Loss of RORβ delays excitatory input and disrupts gene expression and chromatin accessibility, with down-regulation of L4 and up-regulation of L5 genes, suggesting a disruption in cellular specification. Expression and binding site accessibility change for many other TFs, including closure of neurodevelopmental TF binding sites and increased expression and binding capacity of activity-regulated TFs. Lastly, a putative target of RORβ, Thsd7a, is down-regulated without RORβ, and Thsd7a knock-out alone disrupts TCA organization in adult barrels.

Data availability

Raw and processed RNA-seq and ATAC-seq files are available at GEO accession GSE138001.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Erin A Clark

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    For correspondence
    eaclark@brandeis.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4013-325X
  2. Michael Rutlin

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Lucia Capano

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3470-9360
  4. Samuel Aviles

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Jordan R Saadon

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Praveen Taneja

    Department of Biology and National Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Qiyu Zhang

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7141-4046
  8. James B Bullis

    Department of Biology and National Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Timothy Lauer

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Brandeis University, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Emma Myers

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Anton Schulmann

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Douglas Forrest

    Laboratory of Endocrinology and Receptor Biology, National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Sacha B Nelson

    Department of Biology, Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    For correspondence
    nelson@brandeis.edu
    Competing interests
    Sacha B Nelson, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0108-8599

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS109916)

  • Erin A Clark
  • Michael Rutlin
  • Lucia Capano
  • Samuel Aviles
  • Jordan R Saadon
  • Praveen Taneja
  • Qiyu Zhang
  • James B Bullis
  • Timothy Lauer
  • Emma Myers
  • Anton Schulmann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Anne E West, Duke University School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with the requirements ofthe Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Brandeis University (protocol #17001).

Version history

  1. Received: October 2, 2019
  2. Accepted: August 26, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 27, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 15, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: September 29, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,335
    views
  • 261
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Erin A Clark
  2. Michael Rutlin
  3. Lucia Capano
  4. Samuel Aviles
  5. Jordan R Saadon
  6. Praveen Taneja
  7. Qiyu Zhang
  8. James B Bullis
  9. Timothy Lauer
  10. Emma Myers
  11. Anton Schulmann
  12. Douglas Forrest
  13. Sacha B Nelson
(2020)
Cortical RORβ is required for layer 4 transcriptional identity and barrel integrity
eLife 9:e52370.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52370

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52370

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jack W Lindsey, Elias B Issa
    Research Article

    Object classification has been proposed as a principal objective of the primate ventral visual stream and has been used as an optimization target for deep neural network models (DNNs) of the visual system. However, visual brain areas represent many different types of information, and optimizing for classification of object identity alone does not constrain how other information may be encoded in visual representations. Information about different scene parameters may be discarded altogether (‘invariance’), represented in non-interfering subspaces of population activity (‘factorization’) or encoded in an entangled fashion. In this work, we provide evidence that factorization is a normative principle of biological visual representations. In the monkey ventral visual hierarchy, we found that factorization of object pose and background information from object identity increased in higher-level regions and strongly contributed to improving object identity decoding performance. We then conducted a large-scale analysis of factorization of individual scene parameters – lighting, background, camera viewpoint, and object pose – in a diverse library of DNN models of the visual system. Models which best matched neural, fMRI, and behavioral data from both monkeys and humans across 12 datasets tended to be those which factorized scene parameters most strongly. Notably, invariance to these parameters was not as consistently associated with matches to neural and behavioral data, suggesting that maintaining non-class information in factorized activity subspaces is often preferred to dropping it altogether. Thus, we propose that factorization of visual scene information is a widely used strategy in brains and DNN models thereof.

    1. Neuroscience
    Zhaoran Zhang, Huijun Wang ... Kunlin Wei
    Research Article

    The sensorimotor system can recalibrate itself without our conscious awareness, a type of procedural learning whose computational mechanism remains undefined. Recent findings on implicit motor adaptation, such as over-learning from small perturbations and fast saturation for increasing perturbation size, challenge existing theories based on sensory errors. We argue that perceptual error, arising from the optimal combination of movement-related cues, is the primary driver of implicit adaptation. Central to our theory is the increasing sensory uncertainty of visual cues with increasing perturbations, which was validated through perceptual psychophysics (Experiment 1). Our theory predicts the learning dynamics of implicit adaptation across a spectrum of perturbation sizes on a trial-by-trial basis (Experiment 2). It explains proprioception changes and their relation to visual perturbation (Experiment 3). By modulating visual uncertainty in perturbation, we induced unique adaptation responses in line with our model predictions (Experiment 4). Overall, our perceptual error framework outperforms existing models based on sensory errors, suggesting that perceptual error in locating one’s effector, supported by Bayesian cue integration, underpins the sensorimotor system’s implicit adaptation.