Cortical RORβ is required for layer 4 transcriptional identity and barrel integrity

  1. Erin A Clark  Is a corresponding author
  2. Michael Rutlin
  3. Lucia Capano
  4. Samuel Aviles
  5. Jordan R Saadon
  6. Praveen Taneja
  7. Qiyu Zhang
  8. James B Bullis
  9. Timothy Lauer
  10. Emma Myers
  11. Anton Schulmann
  12. Douglas Forrest
  13. Sacha B Nelson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Brandeis University, United States
  2. Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
  3. National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, United States

Abstract

Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor Beta (RORβ) is a transcription factor (TF) and marker of layer 4 (L4) neurons, which are distinctive both in transcriptional identity and the ability to form aggregates such as barrels in rodent somatosensory cortex. However, the relationship between transcriptional identity and L4 cytoarchitecture is largely unknown. We find RORβ is required in the cortex for L4 aggregation into barrels and thalamocortical afferent (TCA) segregation. Interestingly, barrel organization also degrades with age in wildtype mice. Loss of RORβ delays excitatory input and disrupts gene expression and chromatin accessibility, with down-regulation of L4 and up-regulation of L5 genes, suggesting a disruption in cellular specification. Expression and binding site accessibility change for many other TFs, including closure of neurodevelopmental TF binding sites and increased expression and binding capacity of activity-regulated TFs. Lastly, a putative target of RORβ, Thsd7a, is down-regulated without RORβ, and Thsd7a knock-out alone disrupts TCA organization in adult barrels.

Data availability

Raw and processed RNA-seq and ATAC-seq files are available at GEO accession GSE138001.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Erin A Clark

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    For correspondence
    eaclark@brandeis.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4013-325X
  2. Michael Rutlin

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Lucia Capano

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3470-9360
  4. Samuel Aviles

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Jordan R Saadon

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Praveen Taneja

    Department of Biology and National Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Qiyu Zhang

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7141-4046
  8. James B Bullis

    Department of Biology and National Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Timothy Lauer

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Brandeis University, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Emma Myers

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Anton Schulmann

    Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Douglas Forrest

    Laboratory of Endocrinology and Receptor Biology, National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Sacha B Nelson

    Department of Biology, Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    For correspondence
    nelson@brandeis.edu
    Competing interests
    Sacha B Nelson, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0108-8599

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS109916)

  • Erin A Clark
  • Michael Rutlin
  • Lucia Capano
  • Samuel Aviles
  • Jordan R Saadon
  • Praveen Taneja
  • Qiyu Zhang
  • James B Bullis
  • Timothy Lauer
  • Emma Myers
  • Anton Schulmann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were conducted in accordance with the requirements ofthe Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Brandeis University (protocol #17001).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Anne E West, Duke University School of Medicine, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: October 2, 2019
  2. Accepted: August 26, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 27, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 15, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,947
    Page views
  • 239
    Downloads
  • 6
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Erin A Clark
  2. Michael Rutlin
  3. Lucia Capano
  4. Samuel Aviles
  5. Jordan R Saadon
  6. Praveen Taneja
  7. Qiyu Zhang
  8. James B Bullis
  9. Timothy Lauer
  10. Emma Myers
  11. Anton Schulmann
  12. Douglas Forrest
  13. Sacha B Nelson
(2020)
Cortical RORβ is required for layer 4 transcriptional identity and barrel integrity
eLife 9:e52370.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52370

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Miriam Menzel, David Gräßel ... Marios Georgiadis
    Research Article Updated

    Disentangling human brain connectivity requires an accurate description of nerve fiber trajectories, unveiled via detailed mapping of axonal orientations. However, this is challenging because axons can cross one another on a micrometer scale. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) can be used to infer axonal connectivity because it is sensitive to axonal alignment, but it has limited spatial resolution and specificity. Scattered light imaging (SLI) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) reveal axonal orientations with microscopic resolution and high specificity, respectively. Here, we apply both scattering techniques on the same samples and cross-validate them, laying the groundwork for ground-truth axonal orientation imaging and validating dMRI. We evaluate brain regions that include unidirectional and crossing fibers in human and vervet monkey brain sections. SLI and SAXS quantitatively agree regarding in-plane fiber orientations including crossings, while dMRI agrees in the majority of voxels with small discrepancies. We further use SAXS and dMRI to confirm theoretical predictions regarding SLI determination of through-plane fiber orientations. Scattered light and X-ray imaging can provide quantitative micrometer 3D fiber orientations with high resolution and specificity, facilitating detailed investigations of complex fiber architecture in the animal and human brain.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jamie D Costabile, Kaarthik A Balakrishnan ... Martin Haesemeyer
    Research Article

    Brains are not engineered solutions to a well-defined problem but arose through selective pressure acting on random variation. It is therefore unclear how well a model chosen by an experimenter can relate neural activity to experimental conditions. Here we developed 'Model identification of neural encoding (MINE)'. MINE is an accessible framework using convolutional neural networks (CNN) to discover and characterize a model that relates aspects of tasks to neural activity. Although flexible, CNNs are difficult to interpret. We use Taylor decomposition approaches to understand the discovered model and how it maps task features to activity. We apply MINE to a published cortical dataset as well as experiments designed to probe thermoregulatory circuits in zebrafish. MINE allowed us to characterize neurons according to their receptive field and computational complexity, features which anatomically segregate in the brain. We also identified a new class of neurons that integrate thermosensory and behavioral information which eluded us previously when using traditional clustering and regression-based approaches.