Enzyme Mechanisms: Wedging open a catalytic site

The activation mechanism of the nitric oxide receptor has been revealed by cryo-electron microscopy.
  1. Annie Beuve  Is a corresponding author
  1. Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, United States

Of the many ways to regulate blood pressure, the simplest is to dilate or narrow the blood vessels. In the body, the gas nitric oxide (NO) binds to the enzyme soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) to relax blood vessels and decrease blood pressure. When the interaction between NO and sGC is disrupted, people develop hypertension and pulmonary arterial hypertension, and have a higher risk of heart failure. This makes sGC a major target for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Drugs that activate the sGC enzyme have been used for many years, often without understanding their mechanism of action. One striking example is nitroglycerin, which has been used to treat angina pectoris since the end of the 19th century. It took over 100 years to discover that nitroglycerin and other nitrates work by generating NO or its derivatives, which then stimulate sGC to produce cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). The cGMP produced in this way relaxes the coronary arteries and increases blood flow to the heart. Unfortunately, nitroglycerin and most NO donors induce resistance, meaning that the patient becomes less and less responsive to ever-increasing doses of the drug.

In 1994, a small molecule called YC-1, which is not an NO derivative, was found to dramatically enhance the ability of the sGC enzyme to produce cGMP at low NO concentrations (Ko et al., 1994; Friebe et al., 1998). In healthy individuals, NO is produced by endothelial cells, which line the inside of blood vessels. When these cells stop performing their normal roles, the resulting low levels of NO lead to vascular diseases.

Nowadays, pulmonary arterial hypertension is treated with molecules similar to YC-1 (such as Adempas), which can stimulate the sGC enzyme without inducing resistance. These drugs are also in clinical trials for the treatment of chronic heart failure and have the potential to be used for treating chronic kidney diseases, hypertension and fibrotic diseases (Buys et al., 2018; Sandner et al., 2018). Two questions have been the subject of intense scrutiny and conflicting data: where does YC-1 bind to sGC, and how does it increase the impact of NO. Now, in eLife, Michael Marletta, Jim Hurley and colleagues at Berkeley, including Ben Horst and Adam Yokom as joint first authors, report the results of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and small angle X-ray scattering experiments that shed light on these questions (Horst et al., 2019).

Structurally and kinetically, sGC is a complex enzyme. It is a heterodimer formed by two subunits, α and β, which each contain four domains: an N-terminal heme nitric oxide/oxygen binding (HNOX) domain; a Per/Arnt/Sim (PAS)-fold domain; a coiled-coil (CC) domain; and a catalytic domain at the C-terminal (Figure 1A). NO binds to the heme in the β subunit. Over the years, X-ray structures of each domain have been obtained, but attempts to determine the full-length 3D structure of the sGC enzyme have failed repeatedly. Without such structures it is not clear how these domains rearrange upon NO binding to create the most favorable conformation for the production of cGMP (Montfort et al., 2017; Horst and Marletta, 2018). Moreover, it was impossible to determine how molecules similar to YC-1 achieve their therapeutic effect.

Soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) and the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

(A) The enzyme sGC contains two subunits, α and β, and each subunit is composed of four domains: the N-terminal heme nitric oxide/oxygen binding (HNOX) domain, the Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domain, the coiled-coil (CC) domain, and the catalytic domain. (B) In pulmonary arterial hypertension blood vessels contract excessively, thus increasing arterial pressure (left); this process can be reversed (blue arrow) by nitric oxide (NO, hexagons) and drugs called small sGC stimulators (triangles). These molecules bind to sGC and change its conformation so it becomes active and can catalyze the conversion of guanosine triphosphate (GTP, green hexagons) to cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP, light green circles). This last molecule acts a secondary messenger and induces the dilation of blood vessels. Horst et al. have shed light on the mechanism of activation for the sGC enzyme. In the inactive state (bottom), the catalytic site is inaccessible, so the enzyme cannot catalyze the reaction that converts GTP to cGMP; there is also a sharp bend in each coiled-coil domain. When NO binds to the heme in the HNOX domain of the β subunit, the HNOX and PAS domains rotate by 71° leading to the straightening of the bend in the two coiled-coil domains, which opens the catalytic site, thus allowing the enzyme to catalyze the conversion of GTP to cGMP (top). Small stimulators such as YC-1 bind into the space created between the β HNOX and CC domains, acting as a wedge that keeps the enzyme active for longer.

Horst et al. employed cryo-EM to obtain the full-length 3D structures of sGC in a non-activated state and in an activated state after the addition of NO and YC-1. Comparing these two structures reveals the structural changes caused by NO binding and suggest a likely mechanism for the therapeutic action of YC-1-like drugs. When NO binds to the sGC enzyme, a major rearrangement of the HNOX and PAS domains in the β subunit takes place, inducing the CC domains, which include a bend, to become straighter. This twist, in turn, creates an interface between the HNOX and CC domains in the β subunit. These conformational changes lead to opening of the catalytic pocket, making it possible for the sGC enzyme to bind guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and catalyze the production of cGMP (Figure 1B, right panel). Interestingly, YC-1 was found in a site created by the NO-induced rearrangement of the β HNOX and CC domains, where it could act as a wedge to maintain an unbent active conformation.

The structures reported by Horst et al. are similar to recent cryo-EM structures of sGC with and without excess NO (Kang et al., 2019). This suggests that activation at low NO concentrations enhanced by YC-1 is structurally comparable to that at high NO concentrations in the absence of YC-1. These models of sGC activation end years of frustration in the field, and provide a structural basis to further improve the design of small sGC stimulators that could be used to treat cardiovascular diseases (Figure 1).

It remains to be resolved whether YC-1 binds to the same site in the absence of NO, since there are a number of other possible sites (Stasch et al., 2001; Lamothe et al., 2004; Wales et al., 2018). In the current study, small-angle X-ray scattering models indicate that, in the absence of YC-1, sGC enzymes with an NO-equivalent molecule bound to the heme are a mix of bent-inactive and partially extended-activated structures. However, it is still unclear how higher concentrations of NO induce the conversion to the fully extended-activated structure. The mechanism of deactivation also remains unknown. Resolving these two matters is a priority for researchers working on the physiological role of NO.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Annie Beuve

    Annie Beuve is at the Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Newark, United States

    For correspondence
    beuveav@njms.rutgers.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4389-5388

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: November 8, 2019 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2019, Beuve

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 737
    views
  • 65
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Annie Beuve
(2019)
Enzyme Mechanisms: Wedging open a catalytic site
eLife 8:e52418.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52418

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Damien M Rasmussen, Manny M Semonis ... Nicholas M Levinson
    Research Article

    The type II class of RAF inhibitors currently in clinical trials paradoxically activate BRAF at subsaturating concentrations. Activation is mediated by induction of BRAF dimers, but why activation rather than inhibition occurs remains unclear. Using biophysical methods tracking BRAF dimerization and conformation, we built an allosteric model of inhibitor-induced dimerization that resolves the allosteric contributions of inhibitor binding to the two active sites of the dimer, revealing key differences between type I and type II RAF inhibitors. For type II inhibitors the allosteric coupling between inhibitor binding and BRAF dimerization is distributed asymmetrically across the two dimer binding sites, with binding to the first site dominating the allostery. This asymmetry results in efficient and selective induction of dimers with one inhibited and one catalytically active subunit. Our allosteric models quantitatively account for paradoxical activation data measured for 11 RAF inhibitors. Unlike type II inhibitors, type I inhibitors lack allosteric asymmetry and do not activate BRAF homodimers. Finally, NMR data reveal that BRAF homodimers are dynamically asymmetric with only one of the subunits locked in the active αC-in state. This provides a structural mechanism for how binding of only a single αC-in inhibitor molecule can induce potent BRAF dimerization and activation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article Updated

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven cell motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high-MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.