Abstract

Naïve human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) provide a unique experimental platform of cell fate decisions during pre-implantation development, but their lineage potential remains incompletely characterized. As naïve hPSCs share transcriptional and epigenomic signatures with trophoblast cells, it has been proposed that the naïve state may have enhanced predisposition for differentiation along this extraembryonic lineage. Here we examined the trophoblast potential of isogenic naïve and primed hPSCs. We found that naïve hPSCs can directly give rise to human trophoblast stem cells (hTSCs) and undergo further differentiation into both extravillous and syncytiotrophoblast. In contrast, primed hPSCs do not support hTSC derivation, but give rise to non-self-renewing cytotrophoblasts in response to BMP4. Global transcriptome and chromatin accessibility analyses indicate that hTSCs derived from naïve hPSCs are similar to blastocyst-derived hTSCs and acquire features of post-implantation trophectoderm. The derivation of hTSCs from naïve hPSCs will enable elucidation of early mechanisms that govern normal human trophoblast development and associated pathologies.

Data availability

The accession number for the RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data is GSE138762.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chen Dong

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Mariana Beltcheva

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Paul Gontarz

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Bo Zhang

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Pooja Popli

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Laura A Fischer

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Shafqat A Khan

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Kyoung-mi Park

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Eun-Ja Yoon

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Xiaoyun Xing

    Department of Genetics, Center for Genome Sciences & Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Ramakrishna Kommagani

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0403-0971
  12. Ting Wang

    Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Lilianna Solnica-Krezel

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    Lilianna Solnica-Krezel, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  14. Thorold W Theunissen

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, United States
    For correspondence
    t.theunissen@wustl.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6943-7858

Funding

Children's Discovery Institute (CDI-LI-2019-819)

  • Lilianna Solnica-Krezel
  • Thorold W Theunissen

McDonnell Center for Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology (22-3930-26275D)

  • Thorold W Theunissen

NIH Director's New Innovator Award (DP2 GM137418)

  • Thorold W Theunissen

Shipley Foundation Program for Innovation in Stem Cell Science

  • Thorold W Theunissen

Edward Mallinckrodt Jr Foundation

  • Thorold W Theunissen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Marianne E Bronner, California Institute of Technology, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 6, 2019
  2. Accepted: February 11, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 12, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 9, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Dong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 12,739
    Page views
  • 1,852
    Downloads
  • 172
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chen Dong
  2. Mariana Beltcheva
  3. Paul Gontarz
  4. Bo Zhang
  5. Pooja Popli
  6. Laura A Fischer
  7. Shafqat A Khan
  8. Kyoung-mi Park
  9. Eun-Ja Yoon
  10. Xiaoyun Xing
  11. Ramakrishna Kommagani
  12. Ting Wang
  13. Lilianna Solnica-Krezel
  14. Thorold W Theunissen
(2020)
Derivation of trophoblast stem cells from naïve human pluripotent stem cells
eLife 9:e52504.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52504

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52504

Further reading

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Magali Seguret, Patricia Davidson ... Jean-Sébastien Hulot
    Research Article

    We developed a 96-well plate assay which allows fast, reproducible, and high-throughput generation of 3D cardiac rings around a deformable optically transparent hydrogel (polyethylene glycol [PEG]) pillar of known stiffness. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, mixed with normal human adult dermal fibroblasts in an optimized 3:1 ratio, self-organized to form ring-shaped cardiac constructs. Immunostaining showed that the fibroblasts form a basal layer in contact with the glass, stabilizing the muscular fiber above. Tissues started contracting around the pillar at D1 and their fractional shortening increased until D7, reaching a plateau at 25±1%, that was maintained up to 14 days. The average stress, calculated from the compaction of the central pillar during contractions, was 1.4±0.4 mN/mm2. The cardiac constructs recapitulated expected inotropic responses to calcium and various drugs (isoproterenol, verapamil) as well as the arrhythmogenic effects of dofetilide. This versatile high-throughput assay allows multiple in situ mechanical and structural readouts.

    1. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Shintaro Watanuki, Hiroshi Kobayashi ... Keiyo Takubo
    Research Article

    Metabolic pathways are plastic and rapidly change in response to stress or perturbation. Current metabolic profiling techniques require lysis of many cells, complicating the tracking of metabolic changes over time after stress in rare cells such as hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Here, we aimed to identify the key metabolic enzymes that define differences in glycolytic metabolism between steady-state and stress conditions in murine HSCs and elucidate their regulatory mechanisms. Through quantitative 13C metabolic flux analysis of glucose metabolism using high-sensitivity glucose tracing and mathematical modeling, we found that HSCs activate the glycolytic rate-limiting enzyme phosphofructokinase (PFK) during proliferation and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) inhibition. Real-time measurement of ATP levels in single HSCs demonstrated that proliferative stress or OXPHOS inhibition led to accelerated glycolysis via increased activity of PFKFB3, the enzyme regulating an allosteric PFK activator, within seconds to meet ATP requirements. Furthermore, varying stresses differentially activated PFKFB3 via PRMT1-dependent methylation during proliferative stress and via AMPK-dependent phosphorylation during OXPHOS inhibition. Overexpression of Pfkfb3 induced HSC proliferation and promoted differentiated cell production, whereas inhibition or loss of Pfkfb3 suppressed them. This study reveals the flexible and multilayered regulation of HSC glycolytic metabolism to sustain hematopoiesis under stress and provides techniques to better understand the physiological metabolism of rare hematopoietic cells.