1. Plant Biology

Building customizable auto-luminescent luciferase-based reporters in plants

  1. Arjun Khakhar
  2. Colby G Starker
  3. James C Chamness
  4. Nayoung Lee
  5. Sydney Stokke
  6. Cecily Wang
  7. Ryan Swanson
  8. Furva Rizvi
  9. Takato Imaizumi
  10. Daniel F Voytas  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Minnesota, United States
  2. University of Washington, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52786
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Arjun Khakhar
  2. Colby G Starker
  3. James C Chamness
  4. Nayoung Lee
  5. Sydney Stokke
  6. Cecily Wang
  7. Ryan Swanson
  8. Furva Rizvi
  9. Takato Imaizumi
  10. Daniel F Voytas
(2020)
Building customizable auto-luminescent luciferase-based reporters in plants
eLife 9:e52786.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52786
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Bioluminescence is a powerful biological signal that scientists have repurposed as a reporter for gene expression in plants and animals. However, there are downsides associated with the need to provide a substrate to these reporters, including its high cost and non-uniform tissue penetration. In this work we reconstitute a fungal bioluminescence pathway (FBP) in planta using a composable toolbox of parts. We demonstrate that the FBP can create luminescence across various tissues in a broad range of plants without external substrate addition. We also show how our toolbox can be used to deploy the FBP in planta to build auto-luminescent reporters for the study of gene-expression and hormone fluxes. A low-cost imaging platform for gene expression profiling is also described. These experiments lay the groundwork for future construction of programmable auto-luminescent plant traits, such as light driven plant-pollinator interactions or light emitting plant-based sensors.

Data availability

All the data collected for this study is depicted in the figures included in the manuscript. All the raw data used to make the figures has been uploaded.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Arjun Khakhar

    Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Colby G Starker

    Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6774-7227

  3. James C Chamness

    Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Nayoung Lee

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Sydney Stokke

    Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Cecily Wang

    Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Ryan Swanson

    Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Furva Rizvi

    Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Takato Imaizumi

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Daniel F Voytas

    Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    For correspondence
    voytas@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4944-1224

Funding

University of Minnesota (Grand Challenges Postdoctoral Fellowship)

  • Arjun Khakhar

National Institutes of Health (R01GM079712)

  • Nayoung Lee

Rural Development Administration (PJ013386)

  • Nayoung Lee

U.S. Department of Energy

  • Colby G Starker
  • James C Chamness

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Richard Amasino, University of Wisconsin Madison, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 16, 2019
  2. Accepted: March 24, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 25, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 17, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: July 14, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Khakhar et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 15,180
    views
  • 1,725
    downloads
  • 42
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Arjun Khakhar
  2. Colby G Starker
  3. James C Chamness
  4. Nayoung Lee
  5. Sydney Stokke
  6. Cecily Wang
  7. Ryan Swanson
  8. Furva Rizvi
  9. Takato Imaizumi
  10. Daniel F Voytas
(2020)
Building customizable auto-luminescent luciferase-based reporters in plants
eLife 9:e52786.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52786

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52786

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Plant Biology

    Arabidopsis transcriptome responses to low water potential using high-throughput plate assays

    Stephen Gonzalez, Joseph Swift ... Joseph R Ecker
    Short Report

    Soil-free assays that induce water stress are routinely used to investigate drought responses in the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Due to their ease of use, the research community often relies on polyethylene glycol (PEG), mannitol, and salt (NaCl) treatments to reduce the water potential of agar media, and thus induce drought conditions in the laboratory. However, while these types of stress can create phenotypes that resemble those of water deficit experienced by soil-grown plants, it remains unclear how these treatments compare at the transcriptional level. Here, we demonstrate that these different methods of lowering water potential elicit both shared and distinct transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis shoot and root tissue. When we compared these transcriptional responses to those found in Arabidopsis roots subject to vermiculite drying, we discovered many genes induced by vermiculite drying were repressed by low water potential treatments on agar plates (and vice versa). Additionally, we also tested another method for lowering water potential of agar media. By increasing the nutrient content and tensile strength of agar, we show the ‘hard agar’ (HA) treatment can be leveraged as a high-throughput assay to investigate natural variation in Arabidopsis growth responses to low water potential.

    1. Plant Biology

    Distinct effects of phyllosphere and rhizosphere microbes on invader Ageratina adenophora during its early life stages

    Zhao-Ying Zeng, Jun-Rong Huang ... Han-Bo Zhang
    Research Article

    Microbes strongly affect invasive plant growth. However, how phyllosphere and rhizosphere soil microbes distinctively affect seedling mortality and growth of invaders across ontogeny under varying soil nutrient levels remains unclear. In this study, we used the invader Ageratina adenophora to evaluate these effects. We found that higher proportions of potential pathogens were detected in core microbial taxa in leaf litter than rhizosphere soil and thus leaf inoculation had more adverse effects on seed germination and seedling survival than soil inoculation. Microbial inoculation at different growth stages altered the microbial community and functions of seedlings, and earlier inoculation had a more adverse effect on seedling survival and growth. The soil nutrient level did not affect microbe-mediated seedling growth and the relative abundance of the microbial community and functions involved in seedling growth. The effects of some microbial genera on seedling survival are distinct from those on growth. Moreover, the A. adenophora seedling-killing effects of fungal strains isolated from dead seedlings by non-sterile leaf inoculation exhibited significant phylogenetic signals, by which strains of Allophoma and Alternaria generally caused high seedling mortality. Our study stresses the essential role of A. adenophora litter microbes in population establishment by regulating seedling density and growth.