From behavior to circuit modeling of light-seeking navigation in zebrafish larvae

  1. Sophia Karpenko
  2. Sebastien Wolf
  3. Julie Lafaye
  4. Guillaume Le Goc
  5. Thomas Panier
  6. Volker Bormuth
  7. Raphaël Candelier
  8. Georges Debrégeas  Is a corresponding author
  1. Laboratoire Jean Perrin, France
  2. Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, France

Abstract

Bridging brain-scale circuit dynamics and organism-scale behavior is a central challenge in neuroscience. It requires the concurrent development of minimal behavioral and neural circuit models that can quantitatively capture basic sensorimotor operations. Here we focus on light-seeking navigation in zebrafish larvae. Using a virtual reality assay, we first characterize how motor and visual stimulation sequences govern the selection of discrete swim-bout events that subserve the fish navigation in the presence of a distant light source. These mechanisms are combined into a comprehensive Markov-chain model of navigation that quantitatively predict the stationary distribution of the fish's body orientation under any given illumination profile. We then map this behavioral description onto a neuronal model of the ARTR, a small neural circuit involved in the orientation-selection of swim bouts. We demonstrate that this visually-biased decision-making circuit can similarly capture the statistics of both spontaneous and contrast-driven navigation.

Data availability

Data and analysis codes are available at Dryad Digital: Data DOI: doi:10.5061/dryad.v9s4mw6qx

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sophia Karpenko

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sebastien Wolf

    PSL, ENS, CNRS, IBENS, INSERM, Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Julie Lafaye

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Guillaume Le Goc

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Thomas Panier

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Volker Bormuth

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Raphaël Candelier

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1523-6249
  8. Georges Debrégeas

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    georges.debregeas@upmc.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3698-4497

Funding

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0060/2017)

  • Georges Debrégeas

H2020 European Research Council (71598)

  • Volker Bormuth

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE16-0017)

  • Raphaël Candelier
  • Georges Debrégeas

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT201904008219)

  • Sophia Karpenko

ATIP-Avenir program

  • Volker Bormuth

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (SPF201809007064)

  • Sebastien Wolf

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Gordon J Berman, Emory University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were approved by Le Comité d'Éthique pour l'Expérimentation Animale Charles Darwin C2EA-05 (02601.01).

Version history

  1. Received: October 19, 2019
  2. Accepted: January 2, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 2, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 29, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Karpenko et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,085
    views
  • 433
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sophia Karpenko
  2. Sebastien Wolf
  3. Julie Lafaye
  4. Guillaume Le Goc
  5. Thomas Panier
  6. Volker Bormuth
  7. Raphaël Candelier
  8. Georges Debrégeas
(2020)
From behavior to circuit modeling of light-seeking navigation in zebrafish larvae
eLife 9:e52882.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52882

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52882

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Medicine
    Seo-Gyeong Bae, Guo Nan Yin ... Jihwan Park
    Research Article

    Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects a significant proportion of men aged 40–70 and is caused by cavernous tissue dysfunction. Presently, the most common treatment for ED is phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors; however, this is less effective in patients with severe vascular disease such as diabetic ED. Therefore, there is a need for development of new treatment, which requires a better understanding of the cavernous microenvironment and cell-cell communications under diabetic condition. Pericytes are vital in penile erection; however, their dysfunction due to diabetes remains unclear. In this study, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing to understand the cellular landscape of cavernous tissues and cell type-specific transcriptional changes in diabetic ED. We found a decreased expression of genes associated with collagen or extracellular matrix organization and angiogenesis in diabetic fibroblasts, chondrocytes, myofibroblasts, valve-related lymphatic endothelial cells, and pericytes. Moreover, the newly identified pericyte-specific marker, Limb Bud-Heart (Lbh), in mouse and human cavernous tissues, clearly distinguishing pericytes from smooth muscle cells. Cell-cell interaction analysis revealed that pericytes are involved in angiogenesis, adhesion, and migration by communicating with other cell types in the corpus cavernosum; however, these interactions were highly reduced under diabetic conditions. Lbh expression is low in diabetic pericytes, and overexpression of LBH prevents erectile function by regulating neurovascular regeneration. Furthermore, the LBH-interacting proteins (Crystallin Alpha B and Vimentin) were identified in mouse cavernous pericytes through LC-MS/MS analysis, indicating that their interactions were critical for maintaining pericyte function. Thus, our study reveals novel targets and insights into the pathogenesis of ED in patients with diabetes.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Rebecca A Deek, Siyuan Ma ... Hongzhe Li
    Review Article

    Large-scale microbiome studies are progressively utilizing multiomics designs, which include the collection of microbiome samples together with host genomics and metabolomics data. Despite the increasing number of data sources, there remains a bottleneck in understanding the relationships between different data modalities due to the limited number of statistical and computational methods for analyzing such data. Furthermore, little is known about the portability of general methods to the metagenomic setting and few specialized techniques have been developed. In this review, we summarize and implement some of the commonly used methods. We apply these methods to real data sets where shotgun metagenomic sequencing and metabolomics data are available for microbiome multiomics data integration analysis. We compare results across methods, highlight strengths and limitations of each, and discuss areas where statistical and computational innovation is needed.