1. Computational and Systems Biology
  2. Neuroscience
Download icon

From behavior to circuit modeling of light-seeking navigation in zebrafish larvae

  1. Sophia Karpenko
  2. Sebastien Wolf
  3. Julie Lafaye
  4. Guillaume Le Goc
  5. Thomas Panier
  6. Volker Bormuth
  7. Raphaël Candelier
  8. Georges Debrégeas  Is a corresponding author
  1. Laboratoire Jean Perrin, France
  2. Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, France
Research Article
  • Cited 1
  • Views 1,419
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e52882 doi: 10.7554/eLife.52882

Abstract

Bridging brain-scale circuit dynamics and organism-scale behavior is a central challenge in neuroscience. It requires the concurrent development of minimal behavioral and neural circuit models that can quantitatively capture basic sensorimotor operations. Here we focus on light-seeking navigation in zebrafish larvae. Using a virtual reality assay, we first characterize how motor and visual stimulation sequences govern the selection of discrete swim-bout events that subserve the fish navigation in the presence of a distant light source. These mechanisms are combined into a comprehensive Markov-chain model of navigation that quantitatively predict the stationary distribution of the fish's body orientation under any given illumination profile. We then map this behavioral description onto a neuronal model of the ARTR, a small neural circuit involved in the orientation-selection of swim bouts. We demonstrate that this visually-biased decision-making circuit can similarly capture the statistics of both spontaneous and contrast-driven navigation.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sophia Karpenko

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sebastien Wolf

    PSL, ENS, CNRS, IBENS, INSERM, Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Julie Lafaye

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Guillaume Le Goc

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Thomas Panier

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Volker Bormuth

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Raphaël Candelier

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1523-6249
  8. Georges Debrégeas

    IBPS, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    georges.debregeas@upmc.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3698-4497

Funding

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0060/2017)

  • Georges Debrégeas

H2020 European Research Council (71598)

  • Volker Bormuth

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE16-0017)

  • Raphaël Candelier
  • Georges Debrégeas

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT201904008219)

  • Sophia Karpenko

ATIP-Avenir program

  • Volker Bormuth

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (SPF201809007064)

  • Sebastien Wolf

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were approved by Le Comité d'Éthique pour l'Expérimentation Animale Charles Darwin C2EA-05 (02601.01).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Gordon J Berman, Emory University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: October 19, 2019
  2. Accepted: January 2, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 2, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 29, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Karpenko et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,419
    Page views
  • 263
    Downloads
  • 1
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jonathan Oesterle et al.
    Research Article

    While multicompartment models have long been used to study the biophysics of neurons, it is still challenging to infer the parameters of such models from data including uncertainty estimates. Here, we performed Bayesian inference for the parameters of detailed neuron models of a photoreceptor and an OFF- and an ON-cone bipolar cell from the mouse retina based on two-photon imaging data. We obtained multivariate posterior distributions specifying plausible parameter ranges consistent with the data and allowing to identify parameters poorly constrained by the data. To demonstrate the potential of such mechanistic data-driven neuron models, we created a simulation environment for external electrical stimulation of the retina and optimized stimulus waveforms to target OFF- and ON-cone bipolar cells, a current major problem of retinal neuroprosthetics.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Pedro J Gonçalves et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Mechanistic modeling in neuroscience aims to explain observed phenomena in terms of underlying causes. However, determining which model parameters agree with complex and stochastic neural data presents a significant challenge. We address this challenge with a machine learning tool which uses deep neural density estimators—trained using model simulations—to carry out Bayesian inference and retrieve the full space of parameters compatible with raw data or selected data features. Our method is scalable in parameters and data features and can rapidly analyze new data after initial training. We demonstrate the power and flexibility of our approach on receptive fields, ion channels, and Hodgkin–Huxley models. We also characterize the space of circuit configurations giving rise to rhythmic activity in the crustacean stomatogastric ganglion, and use these results to derive hypotheses for underlying compensation mechanisms. Our approach will help close the gap between data-driven and theory-driven models of neural dynamics.