Functional heterogeneity of lymphocytic patterns in primary melanoma dissected through single-cell multiplexing

Abstract

In melanoma, the lymphocytic infiltrate is a prognostic parameter classified morphologically into 'brisk', 'non-brisk' and 'absent' entailing a functional association that has never been proved. Recently, it has been shown that lymphocytic populations can be very heterogeneous, and that anti-PD-1 immunotherapy supports activated T cells. Here, we characterize the immune landscape in primary melanoma by high-dimensional single cell multiplex analysis in tissue sections (MILAN technique) followed by image analysis, RT-PCR and shotgun proteomics. We observed that the brisk and non-brisk patterns are heterogeneous functional categories that can be further sub-classified into active, transitional or exhausted. The classification of primary melanomas based on the functional paradigm also shows correlation with spontaneous regression, and an improved prognostic value when compared to that of the brisk classification. Finally, the main inflammatory cell subpopulations that are present in the microenvironment associated with activation and exhaustion and their spatial relationships are described using neighbourhood analysis.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the submission as source data files. We also included the codes to ease the review in process.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Francesca Maria Bosisio

    Laboratory of Translational Cell and Tissue Research and Pathology Department, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    f.bosisio1@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8874-2003
  2. Asier Antoranz

    National Technical University of Athens, ProtATonce Ltd, Athens, Greece
    For correspondence
    asierantoranz91@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    Asier Antoranz, Asier Antoranz is affiliated with ProtATonce Ltd. The author has no other competing interests to declare.
  3. Yannick van Herck

    Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Maddalena Maria Bolognesi

    Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    Maddalena Maria Bolognesi, Maddalena Maria Bolognesi has received funding from GlaxoSmithKline . The author has no other competing interests to declare.
  5. Lukas Marcelis

    Laboratory of Translational Cell and Tissue Research and Pathology Department, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5446-1801
  6. Clizia Chinello

    Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Jasper Wouters

    Laboratory of Translational Cell and Tissue Research and Pathology Department, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7129-2990
  8. Fulvio Magni

    Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Leonidas Alexopoulos

    National Technical University of Athens, ProtATonce Ltd, Athens, Greece
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Marguerite Stas

    Department of Surgical Oncology, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Veerle Boecxstaens

    Department of Surgical Oncology, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Oliver Bechter

    Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Giorgio Cattoretti

    Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3799-3221
  14. Joost van den Oord

    Laboratory of Translational Cell and Tissue Research and Pathology Department, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (642295)

  • Francesca Maria Bosisio

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (675585)

  • Asier Antoranz

BEL114054 (HGS1006-C1121)

  • Maddalena Maria Bolognesi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee/IRB OG032 of the University Hospital of Leuven. After the approval, the study was identified with the number S57266. According to the Clinical Trial regalement no informed consent was needed due to the use of post-diagnostic left-over material.

Copyright

© 2020, Bosisio et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Francesca Maria Bosisio
  2. Asier Antoranz
  3. Yannick van Herck
  4. Maddalena Maria Bolognesi
  5. Lukas Marcelis
  6. Clizia Chinello
  7. Jasper Wouters
  8. Fulvio Magni
  9. Leonidas Alexopoulos
  10. Marguerite Stas
  11. Veerle Boecxstaens
  12. Oliver Bechter
  13. Giorgio Cattoretti
  14. Joost van den Oord
(2020)
Functional heterogeneity of lymphocytic patterns in primary melanoma dissected through single-cell multiplexing
eLife 9:e53008.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53008

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53008

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Susanne Tilk, Judith Frydman ... Dmitri A Petrov
    Research Article

    In asexual populations that don’t undergo recombination, such as cancer, deleterious mutations are expected to accrue readily due to genome-wide linkage between mutations. Despite this mutational load of often thousands of deleterious mutations, many tumors thrive. How tumors survive the damaging consequences of this mutational load is not well understood. Here, we investigate the functional consequences of mutational load in 10,295 human tumors by quantifying their phenotypic response through changes in gene expression. Using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), we find that high mutational load tumors up-regulate proteostasis machinery related to the mitigation and prevention of protein misfolding. We replicate these expression responses in cancer cell lines and show that the viability in high mutational load cancer cells is strongly dependent on complexes that degrade and refold proteins. This indicates that the upregulation of proteostasis machinery is causally important for high mutational burden tumors and uncovers new therapeutic vulnerabilities.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.