Optimization of energy state transition trajectory supports the development of executive function during youth

Abstract

Executive function develops during adolescence, yet it remains unknown how structural brain networks mature to facilitate activation of the fronto-parietal system, which is critical for executive function. In a sample of 946 human youths (ages 8-23y) who completed diffusion imaging, we capitalized upon recent advances in linear dynamical network control theory to calculate the energetic cost necessary to activate the fronto-parietal system through the control of multiple brain regions given existing structural network topology. We found that the energy required to activate the fronto-parietal system declined with development, and the pattern of regional energetic cost predicts unseen individuals' brain maturity. Finally, energetic requirements of the cingulate cortex were negatively correlated with executive performance, and partially mediated the development of executive performance with age. Our results reveal a mechanism by which structural networks develop during adolescence to reduce the theoretical energetic costs of transitions to activation states necessary for executive function.

Data availability

The PNC data is publicly available in the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes: accession number: phs000607.v3.p2; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs000607.v3.p2. All analysis code is available here: https://github.com/ZaixuCui/pncControlEnergy, with detailed explanation in https://github.com/ZaixuCui/pncControlEnergy/wiki.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zaixu Cui

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Jennifer Stiso

    Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3295-586X
  3. Graham L Baum

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Jason Z Kim

    Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. David R Roalf

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Richard F Betzel

    Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Shi Gu

    Computer Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Zhixin Lu

    Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Cedric H Xia

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Xiaosong He

    Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Rastko Ciric

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Desmond J Oathes

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7346-2669
  13. Tyler M Moore

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Russell T Shinohara

    Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    Russell T Shinohara, has received legal consulting and advisory board income from Genentech/Roche..
  15. Kosha Ruparel

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Christos Davatzikos

    Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Fabio Pasqualetti

    Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Raquel E Gur

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Ruben C Gur

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9657-1996
  20. Danielle S Bassett

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6183-4493
  21. Theodore D Satterthwaite

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    sattertt@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7072-9399

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH106799)

  • Danielle S Bassett

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH113550)

  • Theodore D Satterthwaite

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH107703)

  • Theodore D Satterthwaite

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All subjects or their parent/guardian provided informed consent, and minors provided assent. The Institutional Review Boards of both Penn and CHOP approved study procedures (IRB-approved protocol number 810336).

Copyright

© 2020, Cui et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,320
    views
  • 564
    downloads
  • 58
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zaixu Cui
  2. Jennifer Stiso
  3. Graham L Baum
  4. Jason Z Kim
  5. David R Roalf
  6. Richard F Betzel
  7. Shi Gu
  8. Zhixin Lu
  9. Cedric H Xia
  10. Xiaosong He
  11. Rastko Ciric
  12. Desmond J Oathes
  13. Tyler M Moore
  14. Russell T Shinohara
  15. Kosha Ruparel
  16. Christos Davatzikos
  17. Fabio Pasqualetti
  18. Raquel E Gur
  19. Ruben C Gur
  20. Danielle S Bassett
  21. Theodore D Satterthwaite
(2020)
Optimization of energy state transition trajectory supports the development of executive function during youth
eLife 9:e53060.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53060

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53060

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Mi-Seon Kong, Ethan Ancell ... Larry S Zweifel
    Research Article

    The central amygdala (CeA) has emerged as an important brain region for regulating both negative (fear and anxiety) and positive (reward) affective behaviors. The CeA has been proposed to encode affective information in the form of valence (whether the stimulus is good or bad) or salience (how significant is the stimulus), but the extent to which these two types of stimulus representation occur in the CeA is not known. Here, we used single cell calcium imaging in mice during appetitive and aversive conditioning and found that majority of CeA neurons (~65%) encode the valence of the unconditioned stimulus (US) with a smaller subset of cells (~15%) encoding the salience of the US. Valence and salience encoding of the conditioned stimulus (CS) was also observed, albeit to a lesser extent. These findings show that the CeA is a site of convergence for encoding oppositely valenced US information.

    1. Neuroscience
    Sharon Inberg, Yael Iosilevskii ... Benjamin Podbilewicz
    Research Article

    Dendrites are crucial for receiving information into neurons. Sensory experience affects the structure of these tree-like neurites, which, it is assumed, modifies neuronal function, yet the evidence is scarce, and the mechanisms are unknown. To study whether sensory experience affects dendritic morphology, we use the Caenorhabditis elegans' arborized nociceptor PVD neurons, under natural mechanical stimulation induced by physical contacts between individuals. We found that mechanosensory signals induced by conspecifics and by glass beads affect the dendritic structure of the PVD. Moreover, developmentally isolated animals show a decrease in their ability to respond to harsh touch. The structural and behavioral plasticity following sensory deprivation are functionally independent of each other and are mediated by an array of evolutionarily conserved mechanosensory amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channels (degenerins). Calcium imaging of the PVD neurons in a micromechanical device revealed that controlled mechanical stimulation of the body wall produces similar calcium dynamics in both isolated and crowded animals. Our genetic results, supported by optogenetic, behavioral, and pharmacological evidence, suggest an activity-dependent homeostatic mechanism for dendritic structural plasticity, that in parallel controls escape response to noxious mechanosensory stimuli.