Optimization of energy state transition trajectory supports the development of executive function during youth

Abstract

Executive function develops during adolescence, yet it remains unknown how structural brain networks mature to facilitate activation of the fronto-parietal system, which is critical for executive function. In a sample of 946 human youths (ages 8-23y) who completed diffusion imaging, we capitalized upon recent advances in linear dynamical network control theory to calculate the energetic cost necessary to activate the fronto-parietal system through the control of multiple brain regions given existing structural network topology. We found that the energy required to activate the fronto-parietal system declined with development, and the pattern of regional energetic cost predicts unseen individuals' brain maturity. Finally, energetic requirements of the cingulate cortex were negatively correlated with executive performance, and partially mediated the development of executive performance with age. Our results reveal a mechanism by which structural networks develop during adolescence to reduce the theoretical energetic costs of transitions to activation states necessary for executive function.

Data availability

The PNC data is publicly available in the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes: accession number: phs000607.v3.p2; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs000607.v3.p2. All analysis code is available here: https://github.com/ZaixuCui/pncControlEnergy, with detailed explanation in https://github.com/ZaixuCui/pncControlEnergy/wiki.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zaixu Cui

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Jennifer Stiso

    Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3295-586X
  3. Graham L Baum

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Jason Z Kim

    Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. David R Roalf

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Richard F Betzel

    Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Shi Gu

    Computer Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Zhixin Lu

    Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Cedric H Xia

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Xiaosong He

    Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Rastko Ciric

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Desmond J Oathes

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7346-2669
  13. Tyler M Moore

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Russell T Shinohara

    Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    Russell T Shinohara, has received legal consulting and advisory board income from Genentech/Roche..
  15. Kosha Ruparel

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Christos Davatzikos

    Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Fabio Pasqualetti

    Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Raquel E Gur

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Ruben C Gur

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9657-1996
  20. Danielle S Bassett

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6183-4493
  21. Theodore D Satterthwaite

    Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    sattertt@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7072-9399

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH106799)

  • Danielle S Bassett

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH113550)

  • Theodore D Satterthwaite

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH107703)

  • Theodore D Satterthwaite

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All subjects or their parent/guardian provided informed consent, and minors provided assent. The Institutional Review Boards of both Penn and CHOP approved study procedures (IRB-approved protocol number 810336).

Copyright

© 2020, Cui et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zaixu Cui
  2. Jennifer Stiso
  3. Graham L Baum
  4. Jason Z Kim
  5. David R Roalf
  6. Richard F Betzel
  7. Shi Gu
  8. Zhixin Lu
  9. Cedric H Xia
  10. Xiaosong He
  11. Rastko Ciric
  12. Desmond J Oathes
  13. Tyler M Moore
  14. Russell T Shinohara
  15. Kosha Ruparel
  16. Christos Davatzikos
  17. Fabio Pasqualetti
  18. Raquel E Gur
  19. Ruben C Gur
  20. Danielle S Bassett
  21. Theodore D Satterthwaite
(2020)
Optimization of energy state transition trajectory supports the development of executive function during youth
eLife 9:e53060.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53060

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53060

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sven Ohl, Martin Rolfs
    Research Article

    Detecting causal relations structures our perception of events in the world. Here, we determined for visual interactions whether generalized (i.e. feature-invariant) or specialized (i.e. feature-selective) visual routines underlie the perception of causality. To this end, we applied a visual adaptation protocol to assess the adaptability of specific features in classical launching events of simple geometric shapes. We asked observers to report whether they observed a launch or a pass in ambiguous test events (i.e. the overlap between two discs varied from trial to trial). After prolonged exposure to causal launch events (the adaptor) defined by a particular set of features (i.e. a particular motion direction, motion speed, or feature conjunction), observers were less likely to see causal launches in subsequent ambiguous test events than before adaptation. Crucially, adaptation was contingent on the causal impression in launches as demonstrated by a lack of adaptation in non-causal control events. We assessed whether this negative aftereffect transfers to test events with a new set of feature values that were not presented during adaptation. Processing in specialized (as opposed to generalized) visual routines predicts that the transfer of visual adaptation depends on the feature similarity of the adaptor and the test event. We show that the negative aftereffects do not transfer to unadapted launch directions but do transfer to launch events of different speeds. Finally, we used colored discs to assign distinct feature-based identities to the launching and the launched stimulus. We found that the adaptation transferred across colors if the test event had the same motion direction as the adaptor. In summary, visual adaptation allowed us to carve out a visual feature space underlying the perception of causality and revealed specialized visual routines that are tuned to a launch’s motion direction.

    1. Neuroscience
    Gergely F Turi, Sasa Teng ... Yueqing Peng
    Research Article

    Synchronous neuronal activity is organized into neuronal oscillations with various frequency and time domains across different brain areas and brain states. For example, hippocampal theta, gamma, and sharp wave oscillations are critical for memory formation and communication between hippocampal subareas and the cortex. In this study, we investigated the neuronal activity of the dentate gyrus (DG) with optical imaging tools during sleep-wake cycles in mice. We found that the activity of major glutamatergic cell populations in the DG is organized into infraslow oscillations (0.01–0.03 Hz) during NREM sleep. Although the DG is considered a sparsely active network during wakefulness, we found that 50% of granule cells and about 25% of mossy cells exhibit increased activity during NREM sleep, compared to that during wakefulness. Further experiments revealed that the infraslow oscillation in the DG was correlated with rhythmic serotonin release during sleep, which oscillates at the same frequency but in an opposite phase. Genetic manipulation of 5-HT receptors revealed that this neuromodulatory regulation is mediated by Htr1a receptors and the knockdown of these receptors leads to memory impairment. Together, our results provide novel mechanistic insights into how the 5-HT system can influence hippocampal activity patterns during sleep.