1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Neurodegeneration: Fly model sheds light on brain disease

  1. Martin H Berryer  Is a corresponding author
  2. Sara G Kosmaczewski  Is a corresponding author
  3. Lindy E Barrett  Is a corresponding author
  1. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, United States
  2. Harvard University, United States
Insight
  • Cited 0
  • Views 609
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2019;8:e53233 doi: 10.7554/eLife.53233

Abstract

Experiments on flies suggest that a gain-of-function mechanism in a protein called CSPɑ contributes to the progressive brain disease CLN4.

Main text

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL) refers to a group of progressive brain diseases that affect between 1 and 30 per 100,000 people and are characterized by a decline in motor abilities, seizures, dementia and premature death (Nosková et al., 2011; Haltia, 2003). Most NCLs are caused by the failure of cells to recycle various proteins inside lysosomes (Wisniewski et al., 2001; Henderson et al., 2016; Sambri et al., 2017; Warrier et al., 2013). However, one type of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis is different: CLN4 disease occurs when a patient inherits one mutant copy of the gene that encodes for a protein called CSPɑ, but the precise cellular dysfunction underlying CLN4 disease remains a mystery (Nosková et al., 2011; Benitez and Sands, 2017).

Mutations in this gene have been associated with both loss and gain of function. In theory, the mutations could deplete normal CSPɑ, and this loss of function could contribute to disease pathology. Alternatively, the mutations could enhance the normal activity of CSPɑ or lead to an additional, toxic function to drive disease pathology. Now, in eLife, Konrad Zinsmaier and colleagues at the University of Arizona and Yale University – including Elliot Imler as first author – report the generation of a new animal model to investigate the biological mechanisms underlying CLN4 disease (Imler et al., 2019).

Imler et al. started by expressing either the normal or mutant human forms of CSPɑ in flies and confirming that both were functional in fly cells. Next they confirmed that mutant forms of CSPɑ could mimic pathological features seen in CLN4 patients. Interestingly, they found that the severity of the disease correlated with the copy number of the mutated gene: a single copy of the mutated gene did not affect lifespan, but two copies led to more severe phenotypes and early death. To confirm that these results were not an artifact of expressing a human protein in flies, Imler et al. repeated many of their experiments using mutant versions of fly CSPɑ.

The Arizona–Yale team then looked at where mutant CSPɑ resides in neurons. Normally, one would expect to find CSPɑ at nerve terminals, but the mutations resulted in lower levels of the protein at nerve terminals and higher levels in regions of the cell that contained other proteins that had been marked for degradation. By using markers of different cellular components, the researchers demonstrated that mutant CSPɑ was accumulating on prelysosomal endosomes. An endosome is a mini-compartment within a cell that internalizes molecules from the cell membrane: the endosome then fuses with an organelle called a lysosome, and the molecules inside it are broken down and recycled. Imler et al. hypothesize that mutant CSPɑ may be re-routed from nerve terminals through the endolysosomal pathway. Consistent with this, electron microscopy revealed the formation of abnormal membrane structures in cells, which may be due to mutant CSPɑ congesting the trafficking system.

Next, Imler et al. modulated the levels of normal and mutant CSPɑ in cells. Reducing the level of normal CSPɑ reduced the mutant phenotypes, while increasing it exacerbated the mutant phenotypes. Similarly, reducing the level of a heat shock protein that normally interacts with CSPɑ attenuated mutant phenotypes, suggesting that the heat shock protein may play a role in disease biology. The Arizona–Yale team suggests that the disease-causing mutations in CSPɑ enhance its normal activity to disrupt the function of neurons. This gain-of-function mechanism is distinct from that found in the other NCLs, which typically arise from a deficiency in the function of the mutated gene.

The results of Imler et al. demonstrate the value of the fruit fly model to study CLN4 disease pathology. However, these results also paint a complex picture of CLN4, and much work remains to be done to understand how each molecular or cellular pathology contributes to the devastating cognitive and motor deficits found in patients. Future work can now focus on how these biochemical disruptions impact neuronal function over time, taking advantage of the many tools and techniques available in fly genetics in order to interrogate pathways that have additive or compensatory mechanisms that may someday yield therapeutic potential.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
    The neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinoses
    1. M Haltia
    (2003)
    Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology 62:1–13.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/62.1.1
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Martin H Berryer

    Martin H Berryer is in the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States and the Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

    For correspondence
    mberryer@broadinstitute.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  2. Sara G Kosmaczewski

    Sara G Kosmaczewski is in the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States and the Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

    For correspondence
    skosma@broadinstitute.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  3. Lindy E Barrett

    Lindy E Barrett is in the Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States and the Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States

    For correspondence
    lbarrett@broadinstitute.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3229-4774

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: December 6, 2019 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2019, Berryer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 609
    Page views
  • 62
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Adrian Ponce-Alvarez et al.
    Research Article Updated
    1. Neuroscience
    Flora Bouchacourt et al.
    Research Article Updated