Neurodegeneration: Fly model sheds light on brain disease
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL) refers to a group of progressive brain diseases that affect between 1 and 30 per 100,000 people and are characterized by a decline in motor abilities, seizures, dementia and premature death (Nosková et al., 2011; Haltia, 2003). Most NCLs are caused by the failure of cells to recycle various proteins inside lysosomes (Wisniewski et al., 2001; Henderson et al., 2016; Sambri et al., 2017; Warrier et al., 2013). However, one type of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis is different: CLN4 disease occurs when a patient inherits one mutant copy of the gene that encodes for a protein called CSPɑ, but the precise cellular dysfunction underlying CLN4 disease remains a mystery (Nosková et al., 2011; Benitez and Sands, 2017).
Mutations in this gene have been associated with both loss and gain of function. In theory, the mutations could deplete normal CSPɑ, and this loss of function could contribute to disease pathology. Alternatively, the mutations could enhance the normal activity of CSPɑ or lead to an additional, toxic function to drive disease pathology. Now, in eLife, Konrad Zinsmaier and colleagues at the University of Arizona and Yale University – including Elliot Imler as first author – report the generation of a new animal model to investigate the biological mechanisms underlying CLN4 disease (Imler et al., 2019).
Imler et al. started by expressing either the normal or mutant human forms of CSPɑ in flies and confirming that both were functional in fly cells. Next they confirmed that mutant forms of CSPɑ could mimic pathological features seen in CLN4 patients. Interestingly, they found that the severity of the disease correlated with the copy number of the mutated gene: a single copy of the mutated gene did not affect lifespan, but two copies led to more severe phenotypes and early death. To confirm that these results were not an artifact of expressing a human protein in flies, Imler et al. repeated many of their experiments using mutant versions of fly CSPɑ.
The Arizona–Yale team then looked at where mutant CSPɑ resides in neurons. Normally, one would expect to find CSPɑ at nerve terminals, but the mutations resulted in lower levels of the protein at nerve terminals and higher levels in regions of the cell that contained other proteins that had been marked for degradation. By using markers of different cellular components, the researchers demonstrated that mutant CSPɑ was accumulating on prelysosomal endosomes. An endosome is a mini-compartment within a cell that internalizes molecules from the cell membrane: the endosome then fuses with an organelle called a lysosome, and the molecules inside it are broken down and recycled. Imler et al. hypothesize that mutant CSPɑ may be re-routed from nerve terminals through the endolysosomal pathway. Consistent with this, electron microscopy revealed the formation of abnormal membrane structures in cells, which may be due to mutant CSPɑ congesting the trafficking system.
Next, Imler et al. modulated the levels of normal and mutant CSPɑ in cells. Reducing the level of normal CSPɑ reduced the mutant phenotypes, while increasing it exacerbated the mutant phenotypes. Similarly, reducing the level of a heat shock protein that normally interacts with CSPɑ attenuated mutant phenotypes, suggesting that the heat shock protein may play a role in disease biology. The Arizona–Yale team suggests that the disease-causing mutations in CSPɑ enhance its normal activity to disrupt the function of neurons. This gain-of-function mechanism is distinct from that found in the other NCLs, which typically arise from a deficiency in the function of the mutated gene.
The results of Imler et al. demonstrate the value of the fruit fly model to study CLN4 disease pathology. However, these results also paint a complex picture of CLN4, and much work remains to be done to understand how each molecular or cellular pathology contributes to the devastating cognitive and motor deficits found in patients. Future work can now focus on how these biochemical disruptions impact neuronal function over time, taking advantage of the many tools and techniques available in fly genetics in order to interrogate pathways that have additive or compensatory mechanisms that may someday yield therapeutic potential.
References
-
The neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosesJournal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology 62:1–13.https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/62.1.1
-
Mutations in DNAJC5, encoding cysteine-string protein alpha, cause autosomal-dominant adult-onset neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosisAmerican Journal of Human Genetics 89:241–252.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.07.003
-
Genetic basis and phenotypic correlations of the neuronal ceroid lipofusinosesBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease 1832:1827–1830.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.03.017
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: December 6, 2019 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2019, Berryer et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 751
- Page views
-
- 70
- Downloads
-
- 0
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Synapse is the fundamental structure for neurons to transmit information between cells. The proper synapse formation is crucial for developing neural circuits and cognitive functions of the brain. The aberrant synapse formation has been proved to cause many neurological disorders, including autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Synaptic cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) are thought to play a major role in achieving mechanistic cell-cell recognition and initiating synapse formation via trans-synaptic interactions. Due to the diversity of synapses in different brain areas, circuits and neurons, although many synaptic CAMs, such as Neurexins (NRXNs), Neuroligins (NLGNs), Synaptic cell adhesion molecules (SynCAMs), Leucine-rich-repeat transmembrane neuronal proteins (LRRTMs), and SLIT and NTRK-like protein (SLITRKs) have been identified as synaptogenic molecules, how these molecules determine specific synapse formation and whether other molecules driving synapse formation remain undiscovered are unclear. Here, to provide a tool for synapse labeling and synaptic CAMs screening by artificial synapse formation (ASF) assay, we generated synaptotagmin-1-tdTomato (Syt1-tdTomato) transgenic mice by inserting the tdTomato-fused synaptotagmin-1 coding sequence into the genome of C57BL/6J mice. In the brain of Syt1-tdTomato transgenic mice, the tdTomato-fused synaptotagmin-1 (SYT1-tdTomato) signals were widely observed in different areas and overlapped with synapsin-1, a widely-used synaptic marker. In the olfactory bulb, the SYT1-tdTomato signals are highly enriched in the glomerulus. In the cultured hippocampal neurons, the SYT1-tdTomato signals showed colocalization with several synaptic markers. Compared to the wild-type (WT) mouse neurons, cultured hippocampal neurons from Syt1-tdTomato transgenic mice presented normal synaptic neurotransmission. In ASF assays, neurons from Syt1-tdTomato transgenic mice could form synaptic connections with HEK293T cells expressing NLGN2, LRRTM2, and SLITRK2 without immunostaining. Therefore, our work suggested that the Syt1-tdTomato transgenic mice with the ability to label synapses by tdTomato, and it will be a convenient tool for screening synaptogenic molecules.
-
- Neuroscience
Memory formation depends on neural activity across a network of regions, including the hippocampus and broader medial temporal lobe (MTL). Interactions between these regions have been studied indirectly using functional MRI, but the bases for interregional communication at a cellular level remain poorly understood. Here, we evaluate the hypothesis that oscillatory currents in the hippocampus synchronize the firing of neurons both within and outside the hippocampus. We recorded extracellular spikes from 1854 single- and multi-units simultaneously with hippocampal local field potentials (LFPs) in 28 neurosurgical patients who completed virtual navigation experiments. A majority of hippocampal neurons phase-locked to oscillations in the slow (2–4 Hz) or fast (6–10 Hz) theta bands, with a significant subset exhibiting nested slow theta × beta frequency (13–20 Hz) phase-locking. Outside of the hippocampus, phase-locking to hippocampal oscillations occurred only at theta frequencies and primarily among neurons in the entorhinal cortex and amygdala. Moreover, extrahippocampal neurons phase-locked to hippocampal theta even when theta did not appear locally. These results indicate that spike-time synchronization with hippocampal theta is a defining feature of neuronal activity in the hippocampus and structurally connected MTL regions. Theta phase-locking could mediate flexible communication with the hippocampus to influence the content and quality of memories.