Cortical state transitions and stimulus response evolve along stiff and sloppy parameter dimensions, respectively

  1. Adrian Ponce-Alvarez  Is a corresponding author
  2. Gabriela Mochol
  3. Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal
  4. Jaime de la Rocha
  5. Gustavo Deco
  1. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain
  2. Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Spain

Abstract

Previous research showed that spontaneous neuronal activity presents sloppiness: the collective behavior is strongly determined by a small number of parameter combinations, defined as 'stiff' dimensions, while it is insensitive to many others ('sloppy' dimensions). Here, we analyzed neural population activity from the auditory cortex of anesthetized rats while the brain spontaneously transited through different synchronized and desynchronized states and intermittently received sensory inputs. We showed that cortical state transitions were determined by changes in stiff parameters associated with the activity of a core of neurons with low responses to stimuli and high centrality within the observed network. In contrast, stimulus-evoked responses evolved along sloppy dimensions associated with the activity of neurons with low centrality and displaying large ongoing and stimulus-evoked fluctuations without affecting the integrity of the network. Our results shed light on the interplay among stability, flexibility, and responsiveness of neuronal collective dynamics during intrinsic and induced activity.

Data availability

We made the spiking data publicly available here:https://github.com/adrianponce/Spont_stim_spiking_A1

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Adrian Ponce-Alvarez

    Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    adrian.ponce@upf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1446-7392
  2. Gabriela Mochol

    Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal

    Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jaime de la Rocha

    Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3314-9384
  5. Gustavo Deco

    Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

European Commission (Flag-Era JTC PCI2018-092891)

  • Adrian Ponce-Alvarez
  • Gustavo Deco

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (785907 HBP SGA2)

  • Gustavo Deco

Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (PSI2016-75688-P)

  • Gustavo Deco

Catalan Research Group Support (2017 SGR 1545)

  • Gustavo Deco

Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness together with the European Regional Development Fund Grants (SAF2010-15730)

  • Jaime de la Rocha

Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness together with the European Regional Development Fund Grants (SAF2013-46717-R)

  • Jaime de la Rocha

Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Juan de la Cierva Fellowship IJCI-2014-21937)

  • Gabriela Mochol

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were carried out in accordance with protocols approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Barcelona (Comité d'Experimentació Animal, Universitat de Barcelona, Reference: 116/13).

Copyright

© 2020, Ponce-Alvarez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,758
    views
  • 291
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Adrian Ponce-Alvarez
  2. Gabriela Mochol
  3. Ainhoa Hermoso-Mendizabal
  4. Jaime de la Rocha
  5. Gustavo Deco
(2020)
Cortical state transitions and stimulus response evolve along stiff and sloppy parameter dimensions, respectively
eLife 9:e53268.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53268

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53268

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Simonas Griesius, Amy Richardson, Dimitri Michael Kullmann
    Research Article

    Non-linear summation of synaptic inputs to the dendrites of pyramidal neurons has been proposed to increase the computation capacity of neurons through coincidence detection, signal amplification, and additional logic operations such as XOR. Supralinear dendritic integration has been documented extensively in principal neurons, mediated by several voltage-dependent conductances. It has also been reported in parvalbumin-positive hippocampal basket cells, in dendrites innervated by feedback excitatory synapses. Whether other interneurons, which support feed-forward or feedback inhibition of principal neuron dendrites, also exhibit local non-linear integration of synaptic excitation is not known. Here, we use patch-clamp electrophysiology, and two-photon calcium imaging and glutamate uncaging, to show that supralinear dendritic integration of near-synchronous spatially clustered glutamate-receptor mediated depolarization occurs in NDNF-positive neurogliaform cells and oriens-lacunosum moleculare interneurons in the mouse hippocampus. Supralinear summation was detected via recordings of somatic depolarizations elicited by uncaging of glutamate on dendritic fragments, and, in neurogliaform cells, by concurrent imaging of dendritic calcium transients. Supralinearity was abolished by blocking NMDA receptors (NMDARs) but resisted blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels. Blocking L-type calcium channels abolished supralinear calcium signalling but only had a minor effect on voltage supralinearity. Dendritic boosting of spatially clustered synaptic signals argues for previously unappreciated computational complexity in dendrite-projecting inhibitory cells of the hippocampus.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jessica Royer, Valeria Kebets ... Boris C Bernhardt
    Research Article Updated

    Complex structural and functional changes occurring in typical and atypical development necessitate multidimensional approaches to better understand the risk of developing psychopathology. Here, we simultaneously examined structural and functional brain network patterns in relation to dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) dataset. Several components were identified, recapitulating the psychopathology hierarchy, with the general psychopathology (p) factor explaining most covariance with multimodal imaging features, while the internalizing, externalizing, and neurodevelopmental dimensions were each associated with distinct morphological and functional connectivity signatures. Connectivity signatures associated with the p factor and neurodevelopmental dimensions followed the sensory-to-transmodal axis of cortical organization, which is related to the emergence of complex cognition and risk for psychopathology. Results were consistent in two separate data subsamples and robust to variations in analytical parameters. Although model parameters yielded statistically significant brain–behavior associations in unseen data, generalizability of the model was rather limited for all three latent components (r change from within- to out-of-sample statistics: LC1within = 0.36, LC1out = 0.03; LC2within = 0.34, LC2out = 0.05; LC3within = 0.35, LC3out = 0.07). Our findings help in better understanding biological mechanisms underpinning dimensions of psychopathology, and could provide brain-based vulnerability markers.