MEIS-mediated suppression of human prostate cancer growth and metastasis through HOXB13-dependent regulation of proteoglycans

  1. Calvin VanOpstall
  2. Srikanth Perike
  3. Hannah Brechka
  4. Marc Gillard
  5. Sophia Lamperis
  6. Baizhen Zhu
  7. Ryan Brown
  8. Raj Bhanvadia
  9. Donald J Vander Griend  Is a corresponding author
  1. The University of Chicago, United States
  2. The University of Illinois at Chicago, United States

Abstract

The molecular roles of HOX transcriptional activity in human prostate epithelial cells remain unclear, impeding the implementation of new treatment strategies for cancer prevention and therapy. MEIS proteins are transcription factors that bind and direct HOX protein activity. MEIS proteins are putative tumor suppressors that are frequently silenced in aggressive forms of prostate cancer. Here we show that MEIS1 expression is sufficient to decrease proliferation and metastasis of prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo murine xenograft models. HOXB13 deletion demonstrates that the tumor-suppressive activity of MEIS1 is dependent on HOXB13. Integration of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data revealed direct and HOXB13-dependent regulation of proteoglycans including decorin (DCN) as a mechanism of MEIS1-driven tumor suppression. These results define and underscore the importance of MEIS1-HOXB13 transcriptional regulation in suppressing prostate cancer progression and provide a mechanistic framework for the investigation of HOXB13 mutants and oncogenic cofactors when MEIS1/2 are silenced.

Data availability

RNA-seq and ChIP-seq raw and analyzed data have been deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus and Sequence Read Archive under the accession number GSE132717.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Calvin VanOpstall

    Ben May Institute for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Srikanth Perike

    Pathology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hannah Brechka

    Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marc Gillard

    Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sophia Lamperis

    Pathology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Baizhen Zhu

    Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ryan Brown

    Pathology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Raj Bhanvadia

    Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Donald J Vander Griend

    Pathology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States
    For correspondence
    dvanderg@uic.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4421-5698

Funding

U.S. Department of Defense (PC130587)

  • Donald J Vander Griend

U.S. Department of Defense (PC180414)

  • Donald J Vander Griend

National Institutes of Health (P50 CA180995)

  • Donald J Vander Griend

National Institutes of Health (T32 CA009594)

  • Calvin VanOpstall
  • Hannah Brechka
  • Donald J Vander Griend

National Institutes of Health (F31CA232651)

  • Calvin VanOpstall

National Institutes of Health (P30CA014599)

  • Donald J Vander Griend

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Wilbert Zwart, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Netherlands

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal studies were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the University of Chicago Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (protocol #72231) as well as by the University of Illinois at Chicago IACUC (protocol #18-100).

Version history

  1. Received: November 14, 2019
  2. Accepted: June 17, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 18, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 20, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, VanOpstall et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 25,676
    views
  • 303
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Calvin VanOpstall
  2. Srikanth Perike
  3. Hannah Brechka
  4. Marc Gillard
  5. Sophia Lamperis
  6. Baizhen Zhu
  7. Ryan Brown
  8. Raj Bhanvadia
  9. Donald J Vander Griend
(2020)
MEIS-mediated suppression of human prostate cancer growth and metastasis through HOXB13-dependent regulation of proteoglycans
eLife 9:e53600.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53600

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53600

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Camille Dantzer, Justine Vaché ... Violaine Moreau
    Research Article

    Immune checkpoint inhibitors have produced encouraging results in cancer patients. However, the majority of ß-catenin-mutated tumors have been described as lacking immune infiltrates and resistant to immunotherapy. The mechanisms by which oncogenic ß-catenin affects immune surveillance remain unclear. Herein, we highlighted the involvement of ß-catenin in the regulation of the exosomal pathway and, by extension, in immune/cancer cell communication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We showed that mutated ß-catenin represses expression of SDC4 and RAB27A, two main actors in exosome biogenesis, in both liver cancer cell lines and HCC patient samples. Using nanoparticle tracking analysis and live-cell imaging, we further demonstrated that activated ß-catenin represses exosome release. Then, we demonstrated in 3D spheroid models that activation of β-catenin promotes a decrease in immune cell infiltration through a defect in exosome secretion. Taken together, our results provide the first evidence that oncogenic ß-catenin plays a key role in exosome biogenesis. Our study gives new insight into the impact of ß-catenin mutations on tumor microenvironment remodeling, which could lead to the development of new strategies to enhance immunotherapeutic response.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Fang Huang, Zhenwei Dai ... Yang Wang
    Research Article

    Aberrant alternative splicing is well-known to be closely associated with tumorigenesis of various cancers. However, the intricate mechanisms underlying breast cancer metastasis driven by deregulated splicing events remain largely unexplored. Here, we unveiled that RBM7 is decreased in lymph node and distant organ metastases of breast cancer as compared to primary lesions and low expression of RBM7 is correlated with the reduced disease-free survival of breast cancer patients. Breast cancer cells with RBM7 depletion exhibited an increased potential for lung metastasis compared to scramble control cells. The absence of RBM7 stimulated breast cancer cell migration, invasion, and angiogenesis. Mechanistically, RBM7 controlled the splicing switch of MFGE8, favoring the production of the predominant isoform of MFGE8, MFGE8-L. This resulted in the attenuation of STAT1 phosphorylation and alterations in cell adhesion molecules. MFGE8-L exerted an inhibitory effect on the migratory and invasive capability of breast cancer cells, while the truncated isoform MFGE8-S, which lack the second F5/8 type C domain had the opposite effect. In addition, RBM7 negatively regulates the NF-κB cascade and an NF-κB inhibitor could obstruct the increase in HUVEC tube formation caused by RBM7 silencing. Clinically, we noticed a positive correlation between RBM7 expression and MFGE8 exon7 inclusion in breast cancer tissues, providing new mechanistic insights for molecular-targeted therapy in combating breast cancer.