Enhancer architecture sensitizes cell-specific responses to Notch gene dose via a bind and discard mechanism

  1. Yi Kuang
  2. Ohad Golan
  3. Kristina Preusse
  4. Brittany Cain
  5. Collin J Christensen
  6. Joseph Salomone
  7. Ian Campbell
  8. FearGod V Okwubido-Williams
  9. Matthew R Hass
  10. Zhenyu Yuan
  11. Nathanel Eafergan
  12. Kenneth H Moberg
  13. Rhett A Kovall
  14. Raphael Kopan  Is a corresponding author
  15. David Sprinzak  Is a corresponding author
  16. Brian Gebelein  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, United States
  2. Tel Aviv University, Israel
  3. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, United States
  4. University of Cincinnati, United States
  5. Emory University, United States
  6. Cincinnati Children's hospital, United States

Abstract

Notch pathway haploinsufficiency can cause severe developmental syndromes with highly variable penetrance. Currently, we have a limited mechanistic understanding of phenotype variability due to gene dosage. Here, we unexpectedly found that inserting an enhancer containing pioneer transcription factor sites coupled to Notch dimer sites can induce a subset of Notch haploinsufficiency phenotypes in Drosophila with wild type Notch gene dose. Using Drosophila genetics, we show that this enhancer induces Notch phenotypes in a Cdk8-dependent, transcription-independent manner. We further combined mathematical modeling with quantitative trait and expression analysis to build a model that describes how changes in Notch signal production versus degradation differentially impact cellular outcomes that require long versus short signal duration. Altogether, these findings support a 'bind and discard' mechanism in which enhancers with specific binding sites promote rapid Cdk8-dependent Notch turnover, and thereby reduce Notch-dependent transcription at other loci and sensitize tissues to gene dose based upon signal duration.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yi Kuang

    Graduate Program in Molecular and Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1509-3620
  2. Ohad Golan

    Biochemistry, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kristina Preusse

    Pediatrics - Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Brittany Cain

    Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Collin J Christensen

    Pediatrics - Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6932-5554
  6. Joseph Salomone

    Pediatrics - Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ian Campbell

    Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. FearGod V Okwubido-Williams

    Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Matthew R Hass

    Pediatrics - Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zhenyu Yuan

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry, and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Nathanel Eafergan

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Kenneth H Moberg

    Department of Cell Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Rhett A Kovall

    Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry, and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0520-1613
  14. Raphael Kopan

    Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's hospital, Cincinnati, United States
    For correspondence
    raphael.kopan@cchmc.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. David Sprinzak

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    For correspondence
    davidsp@post.tau.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6776-6957
  16. Brian Gebelein

    Pediatrics - Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States
    For correspondence
    brian.gebelein@cchmc.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9791-9061

Funding

National Science Foundation (1715822)

  • David Sprinzak
  • Brian Gebelein

National Institutes of Health (CA163653)

  • Raphael Kopan

National Institutes of Health (CA178974)

  • Rhett A Kovall

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Kuang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,219
    views
  • 344
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yi Kuang
  2. Ohad Golan
  3. Kristina Preusse
  4. Brittany Cain
  5. Collin J Christensen
  6. Joseph Salomone
  7. Ian Campbell
  8. FearGod V Okwubido-Williams
  9. Matthew R Hass
  10. Zhenyu Yuan
  11. Nathanel Eafergan
  12. Kenneth H Moberg
  13. Rhett A Kovall
  14. Raphael Kopan
  15. David Sprinzak
  16. Brian Gebelein
(2020)
Enhancer architecture sensitizes cell-specific responses to Notch gene dose via a bind and discard mechanism
eLife 9:e53659.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53659

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53659

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Shannon H Carroll, Sogand Schafer ... Eric C Liao
    Research Article

    Wnt signaling plays crucial roles in embryonic patterning including the regulation of convergent extension (CE) during gastrulation, the establishment of the dorsal axis, and later, craniofacial morphogenesis. Further, Wnt signaling is a crucial regulator of craniofacial morphogenesis. The adapter proteins Dact1 and Dact2 modulate the Wnt signaling pathway through binding to Disheveled. However, the distinct relative functions of Dact1 and Dact2 during embryogenesis remain unclear. We found that dact1 and dact2 genes have dynamic spatiotemporal expression domains that are reciprocal to one another suggesting distinct functions during zebrafish embryogenesis. Both dact1 and dact2 contribute to axis extension, with compound mutants exhibiting a similar CE defect and craniofacial phenotype to the wnt11f2 mutant. Utilizing single-cell RNAseq and an established noncanonical Wnt pathway mutant with a shortened axis (gpc4), we identified dact1/2-specific roles during early development. Comparative whole transcriptome analysis between wildtype and gpc4 and wildtype and dact1/2 compound mutants revealed a novel role for dact1/2 in regulating the mRNA expression of the classical calpain capn8. Overexpression of capn8 phenocopies dact1/2 craniofacial dysmorphology. These results identify a previously unappreciated role of capn8 and calcium-dependent proteolysis during embryogenesis. Taken together, our findings highlight the distinct and overlapping roles of dact1 and dact2 in embryonic craniofacial development, providing new insights into the multifaceted regulation of Wnt signaling.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Dena Goldblatt, Basak Rosti ... David Schoppik
    Research Article

    Sensorimotor reflex circuits engage distinct neuronal subtypes, defined by precise connectivity, to transform sensation into compensatory behavior. Whether and how motor neuron populations specify the subtype fate and/or sensory connectivity of their pre-motor partners remains controversial. Here, we discovered that motor neurons are dispensable for proper connectivity in the vestibular reflex circuit that stabilizes gaze. We first measured activity following vestibular sensation in pre-motor projection neurons after constitutive loss of their extraocular motor neuron partners. We observed normal responses and topography indicative of unchanged functional connectivity between sensory neurons and projection neurons. Next, we show that projection neurons remain anatomically and molecularly poised to connect appropriately with their downstream partners. Lastly, we show that the transcriptional signatures that typify projection neurons develop independently of motor partners. Our findings comprehensively overturn a long-standing model: that connectivity in the circuit for gaze stabilization is retrogradely determined by motor partner-derived signals. By defining the contribution of motor neurons to specification of an archetypal sensorimotor circuit, our work speaks to comparable processes in the spinal cord and advances our understanding of principles of neural development.