Structure and physiological function of the human KCNQ1 channel voltage sensor intermediate state

  1. Keenan C Taylor
  2. Po Wei Kang
  3. Panpan Hou
  4. Nien-Du Yang
  5. Georg Kuenze
  6. Jarrod A Smith
  7. Jingyi Shi
  8. Hui Huang
  9. Kelli McFarland White
  10. Dungeng Peng
  11. Alfred L George
  12. Jens Meiler
  13. Robert L McFeeters
  14. Jianmin Cui
  15. Charles R Sanders  Is a corresponding author
  1. Vanderbilt University, United States
  2. Washington University in St Louis, United States
  3. Northwestern University, United States
  4. University of Alabama in Huntsville, United States

Abstract

Voltage-gated ion channels feature voltage sensor domains (VSDs) that exist in three distinct conformations during activation: resting, intermediate, and activated. Experimental determination of the structure of a potassium channel VSD in the intermediate state has previously proven elusive. Here, we report and validate the experimental three-dimensional structure of the human KCNQ1 voltage-gated potassium channel VSD in the intermediate state. We also used mutagenesis and electrophysiology in Xenopus laevis oocytes to functionally map the determinants of S4 helix motion during voltage-dependent transition from the intermediate to the activated state. Finally, the physiological relevance of the intermediate state KCNQ1 conductance is demonstrated using voltage-clamp fluorometry. This work illuminates the structure of the VSD intermediate state and demonstrates that intermediate state conductivity contributes to the unusual versatility of KCNQ1, which can function either as the slow delayed rectifier current (IKs) of the cardiac action potential or as a constitutively active epithelial leak current.

Data availability

The structures determined in this work have been deposited into the Protein Databank (PDB ID 6MIE).NMR data assignments and structural restraints have been deposited in the BioMagResBank (BMRB ID 30517).All electrophysiology and voltage-clamp fluorometry data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript, supporting files, and source data file.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Keenan C Taylor

    Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Po Wei Kang

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for the Investigation of Membrane Excitability Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5933-545X
  3. Panpan Hou

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for the Investigation of Membrane Excitability Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Nien-Du Yang

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for the Investigation of Membrane Excitability Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5261-7382
  5. Georg Kuenze

    Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jarrod A Smith

    Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Jingyi Shi

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for the Investigation of Membrane Excitability Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    Jingyi Shi, is the cofounder of a startup company VivoCor LLC, which is targeting IKs for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia.
  8. Hui Huang

    Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Kelli McFarland White

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for the Investigation of Membrane Excitability Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Dungeng Peng

    Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Alfred L George

    Department of Pharmacology, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Jens Meiler

    Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Robert L McFeeters

    Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Jianmin Cui

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Center for the Investigation of Membrane Excitability Diseases, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    Jianmin Cui, is the cofounder of a startup company VivoCor LLC, which is targeting IKs for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9198-6332
  15. Charles R Sanders

    Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    For correspondence
    chuck.sanders@vanderbilt.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2046-2862

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 HL122010)

  • Alfred L George
  • Jens Meiler
  • Charles R Sanders

National Institutes of Health (R01 NS092570)

  • Jianmin Cui

National Institutes of Health (R01 HL126774)

  • Jianmin Cui

National Institutes of Health (F32 GM117770)

  • Keenan C Taylor

American Heart Association (18POST34030203)

  • Panpan Hou

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Oocytes from Xenopus laevis (frogs) were employed in this work (at Washington University) and the frogs were cared for in accordance with the protocol approved by the Washington University Animal Studies Committee (Protocol # 20190030).

Copyright

© 2020, Taylor et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,041
    views
  • 503
    downloads
  • 43
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Keenan C Taylor
  2. Po Wei Kang
  3. Panpan Hou
  4. Nien-Du Yang
  5. Georg Kuenze
  6. Jarrod A Smith
  7. Jingyi Shi
  8. Hui Huang
  9. Kelli McFarland White
  10. Dungeng Peng
  11. Alfred L George
  12. Jens Meiler
  13. Robert L McFeeters
  14. Jianmin Cui
  15. Charles R Sanders
(2020)
Structure and physiological function of the human KCNQ1 channel voltage sensor intermediate state
eLife 9:e53901.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53901

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53901

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yamato Niitani, Kohei Matsuzaki ... Michio Tomishige
    Research Article

    The two identical motor domains (heads) of dimeric kinesin-1 move in a hand-over-hand process along a microtubule, coordinating their ATPase cycles such that each ATP hydrolysis is tightly coupled to a step and enabling the motor to take many steps without dissociating. The neck linker, a structural element that connects the two heads, has been shown to be essential for head–head coordination; however, which kinetic step(s) in the chemomechanical cycle is ‘gated’ by the neck linker remains unresolved. Here, we employed pre-steady-state kinetics and single-molecule assays to investigate how the neck-linker conformation affects kinesin’s motility cycle. We show that the backward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the front kinesin head confers higher affinity for microtubule, but does not change ATP binding and dissociation rates. In contrast, the forward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the rear kinesin head decreases the ATP dissociation rate but has little effect on microtubule dissociation. In combination, these conformation-specific effects of the neck linker favor ATP hydrolysis and dissociation of the rear head prior to microtubule detachment of the front head, thereby providing a kinetic explanation for the coordinated walking mechanism of dimeric kinesin.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christopher T Schafer, Raymond F Pauszek III ... David P Millar
    Research Article

    The canonical chemokine receptor CXCR4 and atypical receptor ACKR3 both respond to CXCL12 but induce different effector responses to regulate cell migration. While CXCR4 couples to G proteins and directly promotes cell migration, ACKR3 is G-protein-independent and scavenges CXCL12 to regulate extracellular chemokine levels and maintain CXCR4 responsiveness, thereby indirectly influencing migration. The receptors also have distinct activation requirements. CXCR4 only responds to wild-type CXCL12 and is sensitive to mutation of the chemokine. By contrast, ACKR3 recruits GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins and promiscuously responds to CXCL12, CXCL12 variants, other peptides and proteins, and is relatively insensitive to mutation. To investigate the role of conformational dynamics in the distinct pharmacological behaviors of CXCR4 and ACKR3, we employed single-molecule FRET to track discrete conformational states of the receptors in real-time. The data revealed that apo-CXCR4 preferentially populates a high-FRET inactive state, while apo-ACKR3 shows little conformational preference and high transition probabilities among multiple inactive, intermediate and active conformations, consistent with its propensity for activation. Multiple active-like ACKR3 conformations are populated in response to agonists, compared to the single CXCR4 active-state. This and the markedly different conformational landscapes of the receptors suggest that activation of ACKR3 may be achieved by a broader distribution of conformational states than CXCR4. Much of the conformational heterogeneity of ACKR3 is linked to a single residue that differs between ACKR3 and CXCR4. The dynamic properties of ACKR3 may underly its inability to form productive interactions with G proteins that would drive canonical GPCR signaling.