Abstract

String-pulling by rodents is a behavior in which animals make rhythmical body, head, and bilateral forearm as well as skilled hand movements to spontaneously reel in a string. Typical analysis includes kinematic assessment of hand movements done by manually annotating frames. Here, we describe a Matlab® based software that allows whole-body motion characterization using optical flow estimation, descriptive statistics, principal component, and independent component analyses as well as temporal measures of Fano factor, entropy, and Higuchi fractal dimension. Based on image-segmentation and heuristic algorithms for object tracking, the software also allows tracking of body, ears, nose, and forehands for estimation of kinematic parameters such as body length, body angle, head roll, head yaw, head pitch, and path and speed of hand movements. The utility of the task and software is demonstrated by characterizing postural and hand kinematic differences in string-pulling behavior of two strains of mice, C57BL/6 and Swiss Webster.

Data availability

The software is available to download from https://github.com/samsoon-inayat/string_pulling_mouse_matlab. All video source and processed data is made available at the following website https://osf.io/gmk9y/?view_only=cdf229798f2d40e08b98aeadd927f1c2

The following data sets were generated
    1. Samsoon Inayat
    (2019) Mouse String-Pulling Data
    Open Science Framework, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/GMK9Y.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Samsoon Inayat

    Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    For correspondence
    samsoon.inayat@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1966-7967
  2. Surjeet Singh

    Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Arashk Ghasroddashti

    Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Qandeel Qandeel

    Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Pramuka Egodage

    Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ian Q Whishaw

    Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Majid H Mohajerani

    Canadian Centre for Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
    For correspondence
    mohajerani@uleth.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0964-2977

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (390930)

  • Majid H Mohajerani

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (40352)

  • Majid H Mohajerani

Alberta Innovates (43568)

  • Majid H Mohajerani

Alberta Alzheimer Research Program Grant (PAZ15010)

  • Majid H Mohajerani

Alberta Alzheimer Research Program Grant (PAZ17010)

  • Majid H Mohajerani

Alzheimer Society of Canada (43674)

  • Majid H Mohajerani

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed in strict accordance with the Canadian Council of Animal Care and were approved by the University of Lethbridge Animal Welfare Committee (Protocol 1812).

Copyright

© 2020, Inayat et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,964
    views
  • 369
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Samsoon Inayat
  2. Surjeet Singh
  3. Arashk Ghasroddashti
  4. Qandeel Qandeel
  5. Pramuka Egodage
  6. Ian Q Whishaw
  7. Majid H Mohajerani
(2020)
A Matlab-based toolbox for characterizing behavior of rodents engaged in string-pulling
eLife 9:e54540.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54540

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54540

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jacob A Miller
    Insight

    When navigating environments with changing rules, human brain circuits flexibly adapt how and where we retain information to help us achieve our immediate goals.

    1. Neuroscience
    Gáspár Oláh, Rajmund Lákovics ... Gábor Tamás
    Research Article

    Human-specific cognitive abilities depend on information processing in the cerebral cortex, where the neurons are significantly larger and their processes longer and sparser compared to rodents. We found that, in synaptically connected layer 2/3 pyramidal cells (L2/3 PCs), the delay in signal propagation from soma to soma is similar in humans and rodents. To compensate for the longer processes of neurons, membrane potential changes in human axons and/or dendrites must propagate faster. Axonal and dendritic recordings show that the propagation speed of action potentials (APs) is similar in human and rat axons, but the forward propagation of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and the backward propagation of APs are 26 and 47% faster in human dendrites, respectively. Experimentally-based detailed biophysical models have shown that the key factor responsible for the accelerated EPSP propagation in human cortical dendrites is the large conductance load imposed at the soma by the large basal dendritic tree. Additionally, larger dendritic diameters and differences in cable and ion channel properties in humans contribute to enhanced signal propagation. Our integrative experimental and modeling study provides new insights into the scaling rules that help maintain information processing speed albeit the large and sparse neurons in the human cortex.