Abstract

Clytia hemisphaerica jellyfish, with their tetraradial symmetry, offer a novel paradigm for addressing patterning mechanisms during regeneration. Here we show that an interplay between mechanical forces, cell migration and proliferation allows jellyfish fragments to regain shape and functionality rapidly, notably by efficient restoration of the central feeding organ (manubrium). Fragmentation first triggers actomyosin-powered remodeling that restores body umbrella shape, causing radial smooth muscle fibers to converge around 'hubs' which serve as positional landmarks. Stabilization of these hubs, and associated expression of Wnt6, depends on the configuration of the adjoining muscle fiber 'spokes'. Stabilized hubs presage the site of the manubrium blastema, whose growth is Wnt/β-catenin dependent and fueled by both cell proliferation and long-range cell recruitment. Manubrium morphogenesis is modulated by its connections with the gastrovascular canal system. We conclude that body patterning in regenerating jellyfish emerges mainly from local interactions, triggered and directed by the remodeling process.

Data availability

Transcriptomic data are being deposited in ENA (EBI) - accession code PRJEB37920. All other data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chiara Sinigaglia

    Institut de Genomique Fonctionelle de Lyon, ENS Lyon, Lyon, France
    For correspondence
    chi.sinigaglia@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7195-7091
  2. Sophie Peron

    Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), Sorbonne Université, Villefranche-sur-mer, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jeanne Eichelbrenner

    Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), Sorbonne Université, Villefranche-sur-mer, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sandra Chevalier

    Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), Sorbonne Université, Villefranche-sur-mer, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Julia Steger

    Molecular Evolution and Development, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Carine Barreau

    Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), Sorbonne Université, Villefranche-sur-mer, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Evelyn Houliston

    Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), Sorbonne Université, Villefranche-sur-mer, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9264-2585
  8. Lucas Leclère

    Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), Sorbonne Université, Villefranche-sur-mer, France
    For correspondence
    lucas.leclere@obs-vlfr.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7440-0467

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-PDOC-0016)

  • Lucas Leclère

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-19-CE13-0003)

  • Lucas Leclère

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT201805005536)

  • Sophie Peron

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Sinigaglia et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,256
    views
  • 664
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chiara Sinigaglia
  2. Sophie Peron
  3. Jeanne Eichelbrenner
  4. Sandra Chevalier
  5. Julia Steger
  6. Carine Barreau
  7. Evelyn Houliston
  8. Lucas Leclère
(2020)
Pattern regulation in a regenerating jellyfish
eLife 9:e54868.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54868

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54868

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Thomas A Bos, Elizaveta Polyakova ... Monique RM Jongbloed
    Research Article Updated

    Human autonomic neuronal cell models are emerging as tools for modeling diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias. In this systematic review, we compared 33 articles applying 14 different protocols to generate sympathetic neurons and 3 different procedures to produce parasympathetic neurons. All methods involved the differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells, and none employed permanent or reversible cell immortalization. Almost all protocols were reproduced in multiple pluripotent stem cell lines, and over half showed evidence of neural firing capacity. Common limitations in the field are a lack of three-dimensional models and models that include multiple cell types. Sympathetic neuron differentiation protocols largely mirrored embryonic development, with the notable absence of migration, axon extension, and target-specificity cues. Parasympathetic neuron differentiation protocols may be improved by including several embryonic cues promoting cell survival, cell maturation, or ion channel expression. Moreover, additional markers to define parasympathetic neurons in vitro may support the validity of these protocols. Nonetheless, four sympathetic neuron differentiation protocols and one parasympathetic neuron differentiation protocol reported more than two-thirds of cells expressing autonomic neuron markers. Altogether, these protocols promise to open new research avenues of human autonomic neuron development and disease modeling.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sarah Y Coomson, Salil A Lachke
    Insight

    A study in mice reveals key interactions between proteins involved in fibroblast growth factor signaling and how they contribute to distinct stages of eye lens development.