Lipid accumulation controls the balance between surface connection and scission of caveolae

  1. Madlen Hubert
  2. Elin Larsson
  3. Naga Venkata Gayathri Vegesna
  4. Maria Ahnlund
  5. Annika I Johansson
  6. Lindon WK Moodie
  7. Richard Lundmark  Is a corresponding author
  1. Umeå University, Sweden
  2. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
  3. Uppsala University, Sweden

Abstract

Caveolae are bulb-shaped invaginations of the plasma membrane (PM) that undergo scission and fusion at the cell surface and are enriched in specific lipids. However, the influence of lipid composition on caveolae surface stability is not well described or understood. Accordingly, we inserted specific lipids into the cell PM via membrane fusion and studied their acute effects on caveolae dynamics. We demonstrate that sphingomyelin stabilizes caveolae to the cell surface, while cholesterol and glycosphingolipids drive caveolae scission from the PM. Whilst all three lipids accumulated specifically in caveolae, cholesterol and sphingomyelin were actively sequestered, whereas glycosphingolipids diffused freely. The ATPase EHD2 restricts lipid diffusion and counteracts lipid-induced scission. We propose that specific lipid accumulation in caveolae generates an intrinsically unstable domain prone to scission if not restrained by EHD2 at the caveolae neck. This work provides a mechanistic link between caveolae and their ability to sense the PM lipid composition.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript, supporting files and source data files provided for each figure

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Madlen Hubert

    Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Elin Larsson

    Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Naga Venkata Gayathri Vegesna

    Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Maria Ahnlund

    Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Annika I Johansson

    Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lindon WK Moodie

    Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Richard Lundmark

    Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
    For correspondence
    richard.lundmark@umu.se
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9104-724X

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet (dnr 2017-04028)

  • Richard Lundmark

Cancerfonden (CAN 2017/735)

  • Richard Lundmark

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Arun Radhakrishnan, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Version history

  1. Received: January 9, 2020
  2. Accepted: April 29, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 4, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 20, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Hubert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,838
    views
  • 503
    downloads
  • 36
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Madlen Hubert
  2. Elin Larsson
  3. Naga Venkata Gayathri Vegesna
  4. Maria Ahnlund
  5. Annika I Johansson
  6. Lindon WK Moodie
  7. Richard Lundmark
(2020)
Lipid accumulation controls the balance between surface connection and scission of caveolae
eLife 9:e55038.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55038

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55038

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.