Dynamics at the serine loop underlie differential affinity of cryptochromes for CLOCK:BMAL1 to control circadian timing

  1. Jennifer L Fribourgh
  2. Ashutosh Srivastava
  3. Colby R Sandate
  4. Alicia K Michael
  5. Peter L Hsu
  6. Christin Rakers
  7. Leslee T Nguyen
  8. Megan R Torgrimson
  9. Gian Carlo G Parico
  10. Sarvind Tripathi
  11. NIng Zheng
  12. Gabriel C Lander
  13. Tsuyoshi Hirota
  14. Florence Tama  Is a corresponding author
  15. Carrie L Partch  Is a corresponding author
  1. UCSC, United States
  2. Nagoya University, Japan
  3. Scripps Research Institute, United States
  4. University of Washington, United States
  5. Kyoto University, Japan

Abstract

Mammalian circadian rhythms are generated by a transcription-based feedback loop in which CLOCK:BMAL1 drives transcription of its repressors (PER1/2, CRY1/2), which ultimately interact with CLOCK:BMAL1 to close the feedback loop with ~24-hour periodicity. Here we pinpoint a key difference between CRY1 and CRY2 that underlies their differential strengths as transcriptional repressors. Both cryptochromes bind the BMAL1 transactivation domain similarly to sequester it from coactivators and repress CLOCK:BMAL1 activity. However, we find that CRY1 is recruited with much higher affinity to the PAS domain core of CLOCK:BMAL1, allowing it to serve as a stronger repressor that lengthens circadian period. We discovered a dynamic serine-rich loop adjacent to the secondary pocket in the photolyase homology region (PHR) domain that regulates differential binding of cryptochromes to the PAS domain core of CLOCK:BMAL1. Notably, binding of the co-repressor PER2 remodels the serine loop of CRY2, making it more CRY1-like and enhancing its affinity for CLOCK:BMAL1.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession code 6OF7.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jennifer L Fribourgh

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ashutosh Srivastava

    Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9820-720X
  3. Colby R Sandate

    Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8758-5931
  4. Alicia K Michael

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Peter L Hsu

    Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Christin Rakers

    Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5668-6844
  7. Leslee T Nguyen

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Megan R Torgrimson

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Gian Carlo G Parico

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sarvind Tripathi

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6959-0577
  11. NIng Zheng

    Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Gabriel C Lander

    Structural Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4921-1135
  13. Tsuyoshi Hirota

    Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4876-3608
  14. Florence Tama

    Institute of Transformative bio-Molecules, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
    For correspondence
    florence.tama@nagoya-u.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Carrie L Partch

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    For correspondence
    cpartch@ucsc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4677-2861

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM107069)

  • Carrie L Partch

National Institutes of Health (F31 CA189660)

  • Alicia K Michael

National Institutes of Health (S10 OD021634)

  • Gabriel C Lander

UC Cancer Research Coordinating Committee (CRN-15-380548)

  • Carrie L Partch

National Institutes of Health (DP2 EB020402)

  • Gabriel C Lander

RIKEN (Dynamic Structural Biology Project)

  • Florence Tama

Pew Charitable Trusts (Pew Scholar)

  • Gabriel C Lander

Amgen (Young Investigator)

  • Gabriel C Lander

UC Office of the President (Chancellor's Postdoctoral Fellow)

  • Jennifer L Fribourgh

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)

  • Colby R Sandate

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Gilliam fellowship)

  • Christin Rakers

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Adam Frost, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Version history

  1. Received: January 18, 2020
  2. Accepted: February 17, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: February 26, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 9, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Fribourgh et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,517
    views
  • 445
    downloads
  • 51
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jennifer L Fribourgh
  2. Ashutosh Srivastava
  3. Colby R Sandate
  4. Alicia K Michael
  5. Peter L Hsu
  6. Christin Rakers
  7. Leslee T Nguyen
  8. Megan R Torgrimson
  9. Gian Carlo G Parico
  10. Sarvind Tripathi
  11. NIng Zheng
  12. Gabriel C Lander
  13. Tsuyoshi Hirota
  14. Florence Tama
  15. Carrie L Partch
(2020)
Dynamics at the serine loop underlie differential affinity of cryptochromes for CLOCK:BMAL1 to control circadian timing
eLife 9:e55275.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55275

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55275

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Valentina Kugler, Selina Schwaighofer ... Eduard Stefan
    Research Article

    Protein kinases act as central molecular switches in the control of cellular functions. Alterations in the regulation and function of protein kinases may provoke diseases including cancer. In this study we investigate the conformational states of such disease-associated kinases using the high sensitivity of the kinase conformation (KinCon) reporter system. We first track BRAF kinase activity conformational changes upon melanoma drug binding. Second, we also use the KinCon reporter technology to examine the impact of regulatory protein interactions on LKB1 kinase tumor suppressor functions. Third, we explore the conformational dynamics of RIP kinases in response to TNF pathway activation and small molecule interactions. Finally, we show that CDK4/6 interactions with regulatory proteins alter conformations which remain unaffected in the presence of clinically applied inhibitors. Apart from its predictive value, the KinCon technology helps to identify cellular factors that impact drug efficacies. The understanding of the structural dynamics of full-length protein kinases when interacting with small molecule inhibitors or regulatory proteins is crucial for designing more effective therapeutic strategies.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Sandeep K Ravala, Sendi Rafael Adame-Garcia ... John JG Tesmer
    Research Article

    PIP3-dependent Rac exchanger 1 (P-Rex1) is abundantly expressed in neutrophils and plays central roles in chemotaxis and cancer metastasis by serving as a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rac. The enzyme is synergistically activated by PIP3 and heterotrimeric Gβγ subunits, but mechanistic details remain poorly understood. While investigating the regulation of P-Rex1 by PIP3, we discovered that Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (IP4) inhibits P-Rex1 activity and induces large decreases in backbone dynamics in diverse regions of the protein. Cryo-electron microscopy analysis of the P-Rex1·IP4 complex revealed a conformation wherein the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain occludes the active site of the Dbl homology (DH) domain. This configuration is stabilized by interactions between the first DEP domain (DEP1) and the DH domain and between the PH domain and a 4-helix bundle (4HB) subdomain that extends from the C-terminal domain of P-Rex1. Disruption of the DH–DEP1 interface in a DH/PH-DEP1 fragment enhanced activity and led to a more extended conformation in solution, whereas mutations that constrain the occluded conformation led to decreased GEF activity. Variants of full-length P-Rex1 in which the DH–DEP1 and PH–4HB interfaces were disturbed exhibited enhanced activity during chemokine-induced cell migration, confirming that the observed structure represents the autoinhibited state in living cells. Interactions with PIP3-containing liposomes led to disruption of these interfaces and increased dynamics protein-wide. Our results further suggest that inositol phosphates such as IP4 help to inhibit basal P-Rex1 activity in neutrophils, similar to their inhibitory effects on phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase.