Dynamics at the serine loop underlie differential affinity of cryptochromes for CLOCK:BMAL1 to control circadian timing

  1. Jennifer L Fribourgh
  2. Ashutosh Srivastava
  3. Colby R Sandate
  4. Alicia K Michael
  5. Peter L Hsu
  6. Christin Rakers
  7. Leslee T Nguyen
  8. Megan R Torgrimson
  9. Gian Carlo G Parico
  10. Sarvind Tripathi
  11. NIng Zheng
  12. Gabriel C Lander
  13. Tsuyoshi Hirota
  14. Florence Tama  Is a corresponding author
  15. Carrie L Partch  Is a corresponding author
  1. UCSC, United States
  2. Nagoya University, Japan
  3. Scripps Research Institute, United States
  4. University of Washington, United States
  5. Kyoto University, Japan

Abstract

Mammalian circadian rhythms are generated by a transcription-based feedback loop in which CLOCK:BMAL1 drives transcription of its repressors (PER1/2, CRY1/2), which ultimately interact with CLOCK:BMAL1 to close the feedback loop with ~24-hour periodicity. Here we pinpoint a key difference between CRY1 and CRY2 that underlies their differential strengths as transcriptional repressors. Both cryptochromes bind the BMAL1 transactivation domain similarly to sequester it from coactivators and repress CLOCK:BMAL1 activity. However, we find that CRY1 is recruited with much higher affinity to the PAS domain core of CLOCK:BMAL1, allowing it to serve as a stronger repressor that lengthens circadian period. We discovered a dynamic serine-rich loop adjacent to the secondary pocket in the photolyase homology region (PHR) domain that regulates differential binding of cryptochromes to the PAS domain core of CLOCK:BMAL1. Notably, binding of the co-repressor PER2 remodels the serine loop of CRY2, making it more CRY1-like and enhancing its affinity for CLOCK:BMAL1.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession code 6OF7.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jennifer L Fribourgh

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ashutosh Srivastava

    Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9820-720X
  3. Colby R Sandate

    Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8758-5931
  4. Alicia K Michael

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Peter L Hsu

    Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Christin Rakers

    Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5668-6844
  7. Leslee T Nguyen

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Megan R Torgrimson

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Gian Carlo G Parico

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sarvind Tripathi

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6959-0577
  11. NIng Zheng

    Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Gabriel C Lander

    Structural Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4921-1135
  13. Tsuyoshi Hirota

    Institute of Transformative Bio-Molecules, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4876-3608
  14. Florence Tama

    Institute of Transformative bio-Molecules, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
    For correspondence
    florence.tama@nagoya-u.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Carrie L Partch

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSC, Santa Cruz, United States
    For correspondence
    cpartch@ucsc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4677-2861

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM107069)

  • Carrie L Partch

National Institutes of Health (F31 CA189660)

  • Alicia K Michael

National Institutes of Health (S10 OD021634)

  • Gabriel C Lander

UC Cancer Research Coordinating Committee (CRN-15-380548)

  • Carrie L Partch

National Institutes of Health (DP2 EB020402)

  • Gabriel C Lander

RIKEN (Dynamic Structural Biology Project)

  • Florence Tama

Pew Charitable Trusts (Pew Scholar)

  • Gabriel C Lander

Amgen (Young Investigator)

  • Gabriel C Lander

UC Office of the President (Chancellor's Postdoctoral Fellow)

  • Jennifer L Fribourgh

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)

  • Colby R Sandate

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Gilliam fellowship)

  • Christin Rakers

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Fribourgh et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,589
    views
  • 453
    downloads
  • 53
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jennifer L Fribourgh
  2. Ashutosh Srivastava
  3. Colby R Sandate
  4. Alicia K Michael
  5. Peter L Hsu
  6. Christin Rakers
  7. Leslee T Nguyen
  8. Megan R Torgrimson
  9. Gian Carlo G Parico
  10. Sarvind Tripathi
  11. NIng Zheng
  12. Gabriel C Lander
  13. Tsuyoshi Hirota
  14. Florence Tama
  15. Carrie L Partch
(2020)
Dynamics at the serine loop underlie differential affinity of cryptochromes for CLOCK:BMAL1 to control circadian timing
eLife 9:e55275.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55275

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55275

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Emily L Dearlove, Chatrin Chatrin ... Danny T Huang
    Research Article

    Ubiquitination typically involves covalent linking of ubiquitin (Ub) to a lysine residue on a protein substrate. Recently, new facets of this process have emerged, including Ub modification of non-proteinaceous substrates like ADP-ribose by the DELTEX E3 ligase family. Here, we show that the DELTEX family member DTX3L expands this non-proteinaceous substrate repertoire to include single-stranded DNA and RNA. Although the N-terminal region of DTX3L contains single-stranded nucleic acid binding domains and motifs, the minimal catalytically competent fragment comprises the C-terminal RING and DTC domains (RD). DTX3L-RD catalyses ubiquitination of the 3’-end of single-stranded DNA and RNA, as well as double-stranded DNA with a 3’ overhang of two or more nucleotides. This modification is reversibly cleaved by deubiquitinases. NMR and biochemical analyses reveal that the DTC domain binds single-stranded DNA and facilitates the catalysis of Ub transfer from RING-bound E2-conjugated Ub. Our study unveils the direct ubiquitination of nucleic acids by DTX3L, laying the groundwork for understanding its functional implications.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Jaskamaljot Kaur Banwait, Liana Islam, Aaron L Lucius
    Research Article

    Escherichia coli ClpB and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hsp104 are AAA+ motor proteins essential for proteome maintenance and thermal tolerance. ClpB and Hsp104 have been proposed to extract a polypeptide from an aggregate and processively translocate the chain through the axial channel of its hexameric ring structure. However, the mechanism of translocation and if this reaction is processive remains disputed. We reported that Hsp104 and ClpB are non-processive on unfolded model substrates. Others have reported that ClpB is able to processively translocate a mechanically unfolded polypeptide chain at rates over 240 amino acids (aa) per second. Here, we report the development of a single turnover stopped-flow fluorescence strategy that reports on processive protein unfolding catalyzed by ClpB. We show that when translocation catalyzed by ClpB is challenged by stably folded protein structure, the motor enzymatically unfolds the substrate at a rate of ~0.9 aa s−1 with a kinetic step-size of ~60 amino acids at sub-saturating [ATP]. We reconcile the apparent controversy by defining enzyme catalyzed protein unfolding and translocation as two distinct reactions with different mechanisms of action. We propose a model where slow unfolding followed by fast translocation represents an important mechanistic feature that allows the motor to rapidly translocate up to the next folded region or rapidly dissociate if no additional fold is encountered.