1. Physics of Living Systems

Deciphering the regulatory genome of Escherichia coli, one hundred promoters at a time

  1. William T Ireland
  2. Suzannah M Beeler
  3. Emanuel Flores-Bautista
  4. Nicholas S McCarty
  5. Tom Röschinger
  6. Nathan M Belliveau
  7. Michael J Sweredoski
  8. Annie Moradian
  9. Justin B Kinney
  10. Rob Phillips  Is a corresponding author
  1. California Institute of Technology, United States
  2. California Institute of Technology, United States
  3. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55308
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. William T Ireland
  2. Suzannah M Beeler
  3. Emanuel Flores-Bautista
  4. Nicholas S McCarty
  5. Tom Röschinger
  6. Nathan M Belliveau
  7. Michael J Sweredoski
  8. Annie Moradian
  9. Justin B Kinney
  10. Rob Phillips
(2020)
Deciphering the regulatory genome of Escherichia coli, one hundred promoters at a time
eLife 9:e55308.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55308
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Advances in DNA sequencing have revolutionized our ability to read genomes. However, even in the most well-studied of organisms, the bacterium Escherichia coli, for ≈ 65% of promoters we remain ignorant of their regulation. Until we crack this regulatory Rosetta Stone, efforts to read and write genomes will remain haphazard. We introduce a new method, Reg-Seq, that links massively-parallel reporter assays with mass spectrometry to produce a base pair resolution dissection of more than 100 E. coli promoters in 12 growth conditions. We demonstrate that the method recapitulates known regulatory information. Then, we examine regulatory architectures for more than 80 promoters which previously had no known regulatory information. In many cases, we also identify which transcription factors mediate their regulation. This method clears a path for highly multiplexed investigations of the regulatory genome of model organisms, with the potential of moving to an array of microbes of ecological and medical relevance.

Data availability

Sequencing data has been deposited in the SRA under accession no.PRJNA599253 and PRJNA603368Mass spectrometry data is deposited in the CalTech data repository at doi:10.22002/d1.1336Model files and inferred information footprints are deposited in the CalTech data repository at doi:10.22002/D1.1331Processed sequencing data sets and analysis software are available in the GitHub repository available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3953312

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. William T Ireland

    Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0971-2904

  2. Suzannah M Beeler

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1930-4827

  3. Emanuel Flores-Bautista

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Nicholas S McCarty

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Tom Röschinger

    Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Nathan M Belliveau

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1536-1963

  7. Michael J Sweredoski

    Proteome Exploration Laboratory, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, Beckman Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0878-3831

  8. Annie Moradian

    Proteome Exploration Laboratory, Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, Beckman Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0407-2031

  9. Justin B Kinney

    Simons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1897-3778

  10. Rob Phillips

    Department of Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    For correspondence
    phillips@pboc.caltech.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3082-2809

Funding

National Institutes of Health (Director's Pioneer Award)

  • Rob Phillips

National Institutes of Health (National Research Service Award,5T32GM007616-38)

  • Suzannah M Beeler

National Institutes of Health (Maximizing Investigators Research Award)

  • Rob Phillips

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (International Student Research Fellowship)

  • Nathan M Belliveau

National Institutes of Health (1S10OD02001301)

  • Annie Moradian

National Institutes of Health (1S10OD02001301)

  • Michael J Sweredoski

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Armita Nourmohammad, University of Washington, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: January 20, 2020
  2. Accepted: September 18, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: September 21, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: October 16, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Ireland et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,446
    Page views
  • 591
    Downloads
  • 10
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. William T Ireland
  2. Suzannah M Beeler
  3. Emanuel Flores-Bautista
  4. Nicholas S McCarty
  5. Tom Röschinger
  6. Nathan M Belliveau
  7. Michael J Sweredoski
  8. Annie Moradian
  9. Justin B Kinney
  10. Rob Phillips
(2020)
Deciphering the regulatory genome of Escherichia coli, one hundred promoters at a time
eLife 9:e55308.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55308

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Physics of Living Systems

    Learning to predict target location with turbulent odor plumes

    Nicola Rigolli et al.
    Research Article

    Animal behavior and neural recordings show that the brain is able to measure both the intensity and the timing of odor encounters. However, whether intensity or timing of odor detections is more informative for olfactory-driven behavior is not understood. To tackle this question, we consider the problem of locating a target using the odor it releases. We ask whether the position of a target is best predicted by measures of timing vs intensity of its odor, sampled for a short period of time. To answer this question, we feed data from accurate numerical simulations of odor transport to machine learning algorithms that learn how to connect odor to target location. We find that both intensity and timing can separately predict target location even from a distance of several meters; however, their efficacy varies with the dilution of the odor in space. Thus, organisms that use olfaction from different ranges may have to switch among different modalities. This has implications on how the brain should represent odors as the target is approached. We demonstrate simple strategies to improve accuracy and robustness of the prediction by modifying odor sampling and appropriately combining distinct measures together. To test the predictions, animal behavior and odor representation should be monitored as the animal moves relative to the target, or in virtual conditions that mimic concentrated vs dilute environments.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems

    Three-dimensional structure of kinetochore-fibers in human mitotic spindles

    Robert Kiewisz et al.
    Research Article Updated

    During cell division, kinetochore microtubules (KMTs) provide a physical linkage between the chromosomes and the rest of the spindle. KMTs in mammalian cells are organized into bundles, so-called kinetochore-fibers (k-fibers), but the ultrastructure of these fibers is currently not well characterized. Here, we show by large-scale electron tomography that each k-fiber in HeLa cells in metaphase is composed of approximately nine KMTs, only half of which reach the spindle pole. Our comprehensive reconstructions allowed us to analyze the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of k-fibers and their surrounding MTs in detail. We found that k-fibers exhibit remarkable variation in circumference and KMT density along their length, with the pole-proximal side showing a broadening. Extending our structural analysis then to other MTs in the spindle, we further observed that the association of KMTs with non-KMTs predominantly occurs in the spindle pole regions. Our 3D reconstructions have implications for KMT growth and k-fiber self-organization models as covered in a parallel publication applying complementary live-cell imaging in combination with biophysical modeling (Conway et al., 2022). Finally, we also introduce a new visualization tool allowing an interactive display of our 3D spindle data that will serve as a resource for further structural studies on mitosis in human cells.

    1. Physics of Living Systems

    Interplay of surface interaction and magnetic torque in single-cell motion of magnetotactic bacteria in microfluidic confinement

    Agnese Codutti et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Swimming microorganisms often experience complex environments in their natural habitat. The same is true for microswimmers in envisioned biomedical applications. The simple aqueous conditions typically studied in the lab differ strongly from those found in these environments and often exclude the effects of small volume confinement or the influence that external fields have on their motion. In this work, we investigate magnetically steerable microswimmers, specifically magnetotactic bacteria, in strong spatial confinement and under the influence of an external magnetic field. We trap single cells in micrometer-sized microfluidic chambers and track and analyze their motion, which shows a variety of different trajectories, depending on the chamber size and the strength of the magnetic field. Combining these experimental observations with simulations using a variant of an active Brownian particle model, we explain the variety of trajectories by the interplay between the wall interactions and the magnetic torque. We also analyze the pronounced cell-to-cell heterogeneity, which makes single-cell tracking essential for an understanding of the motility patterns. In this way, our work establishes a basis for the analysis and prediction of microswimmer motility in more complex environments.