Abstract

This study examines how site-specific binding to three identified neurosteroid binding sites in the α1β3 GABAA receptor (GABAAR) contributes to neurosteroid allosteric modulation. We found that the potentiating neurosteroid, allopregnanolone, but not its inhibitory 3β-epimer epi-allopregnanolone, binds to the canonical β3(+)–α1(-) intersubunit site that mediates receptor activation by neurosteroids. In contrast, both allopregnanolone and epi-allopregnanolone bind to intrasubunit sites in the β3 subunit, promoting receptor desensitization and the α1 subunit promoting effects that vary between neurosteroids. Two neurosteroid analogues with diazirine moieties replacing the 3-hydroxyl (KK148 and KK150) bind to all three sites, but do not potentiate GABAAR currents. KK148 is a desensitizing agent, whereas KK150 is devoid of allosteric activity. These compounds provide potential chemical scaffolds for neurosteroid antagonists. Collectively, these data show that differential occupancy and efficacy at three discrete neurosteroid binding sites determine whether a neurosteroid has potentiating, inhibitory, or competitive antagonist activity on GABAARs.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yusuke Sugasawa

    Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1607-0460
  2. Wayland WL Cheng

    Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9529-9820
  3. John R Bracamontes

    Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Zi-Wei Chen

    Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8601-2210
  5. Lei Wang

    Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Allison L Germann

    Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Spencer R Pierce

    Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Thomas C Senneff

    Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kathiresan Krishnan

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. David E Reichert

    Radiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Douglas F Covey

    Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Gustav Akk

    Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Alex S Evers

    Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    For correspondence
    eversa@wustl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0342-0575

Funding

National Institutes of Health (2R01GM108799-05)

  • Alex S Evers

National Institutes of Health (2R01GM108799-05)

  • Douglas F Covey

National Institutes of Health (5K08GM126336-03)

  • Wayland WL Cheng

National Institutes of Health (5R01GM108580-06)

  • Gustav Akk

Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research

  • Alex S Evers

Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research

  • Gustav Akk

Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research

  • Douglas F Covey

Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research

  • David E Reichert

Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research

  • Zi-Wei Chen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Sugasawa et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,077
    views
  • 445
    downloads
  • 39
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yusuke Sugasawa
  2. Wayland WL Cheng
  3. John R Bracamontes
  4. Zi-Wei Chen
  5. Lei Wang
  6. Allison L Germann
  7. Spencer R Pierce
  8. Thomas C Senneff
  9. Kathiresan Krishnan
  10. David E Reichert
  11. Douglas F Covey
  12. Gustav Akk
  13. Alex S Evers
(2020)
Site-specific effects of neurosteroids on GABAA receptor activation and desensitization
eLife 9:e55331.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55331

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55331

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jinsai Shang, Douglas J Kojetin
    Research Advance

    Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates gene expression programs in response to ligand binding. Endogenous and synthetic ligands, including covalent antagonist inhibitors GW9662 and T0070907, are thought to compete for the orthosteric pocket in the ligand-binding domain (LBD). However, we previously showed that synthetic PPARγ ligands can cooperatively cobind with and reposition a bound endogenous orthosteric ligand to an alternate site, synergistically regulating PPARγ structure and function (Shang et al., 2018). Here, we reveal the structural mechanism of cobinding between a synthetic covalent antagonist inhibitor with other synthetic ligands. Biochemical and NMR data show that covalent inhibitors weaken—but do not prevent—the binding of other ligands via an allosteric mechanism, rather than direct ligand clashing, by shifting the LBD ensemble toward a transcriptionally repressive conformation, which structurally clashes with orthosteric ligand binding. Crystal structures reveal different cobinding mechanisms including alternate site binding to unexpectedly adopting an orthosteric binding mode by altering the covalent inhibitor binding pose. Our findings highlight the significant flexibility of the PPARγ orthosteric pocket, its ability to accommodate multiple ligands, and demonstrate that GW9662 and T0070907 should not be used as chemical tools to inhibit ligand binding to PPARγ.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.