Abstract

Nanodiscs are membrane mimetics that consist of a protein belt surrounding a lipid bilayer, and are broadly used for characterization of membrane proteins. Here, we investigate the structure, dynamics and biophysical properties of two small nanodiscs, MSP1D1ΔH5 and ΔH4H5. We combine our SAXS and SANS experiments with molecular dynamics simulations and previously obtained NMR and EPR data to derive and validate a conformational ensemble that represents the structure and dynamics of the nanodisc. We find that it displays conformational heterogeneity with various elliptical shapes, and with substantial differences in lipid ordering in the centre and rim of the discs. Together, our results reconcile previous apparently conflicting observations about the shape of nanodiscs, and paves the way for future integrative studies of larger complex systems such as membrane proteins embedded in nanodiscs.

Data availability

Scattering data, molecular simulations and results from reweighting are available at https://github.com/KULL-Centre/papers/tree/master/2020/nanodisc-bengtsen-et-al

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tone Bengtsen

    Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Viktor L Holm

    Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lisbeth Ravnkilde Kjølbye

    Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Søren R Midtgaard

    Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Nicolai Tidemand Johansen

    Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Giulio Tesei

    Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sandro Bottaro

    Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1606-890X
  8. Birgit Schiøtt

    Department of Chemistry, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Lise Arleth

    Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    For correspondence
    arleth@nbi.ku.dk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

    Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    For correspondence
    lindorff@bio.ku.dk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4750-6039

Funding

Danish Council for Independent Researtch

  • Birgit Schiøtt

Lundbeckfonden (BRAINSTRUC)

  • Lise Arleth
  • Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

Novo Nordisk Foundation (Hallas-Møller Stipend)

  • Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

Villum Fonden (Block grant)

  • Sandro Bottaro
  • Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Bengtsen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,195
    views
  • 585
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tone Bengtsen
  2. Viktor L Holm
  3. Lisbeth Ravnkilde Kjølbye
  4. Søren R Midtgaard
  5. Nicolai Tidemand Johansen
  6. Giulio Tesei
  7. Sandro Bottaro
  8. Birgit Schiøtt
  9. Lise Arleth
  10. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
(2020)
Structure and dynamics of a nanodisc by integrating NMR, SAXS and SANS experiments with molecular dynamics simulations
eLife 9:e56518.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56518

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56518

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Bradley P Clarke, Alexia E Angelos ... Yi Ren
    Research Article

    In eukaryotes, RNAs transcribed by RNA Pol II are modified at the 5′ end with a 7-methylguanosine (m7G) cap, which is recognized by the nuclear cap binding complex (CBC). The CBC plays multiple important roles in mRNA metabolism, including transcription, splicing, polyadenylation, and export. It promotes mRNA export through direct interaction with a key mRNA export factor, ALYREF, which in turn links the TRanscription and EXport (TREX) complex to the 5′ end of mRNA. However, the molecular mechanism for CBC-mediated recruitment of the mRNA export machinery is not well understood. Here, we present the first structure of the CBC in complex with an mRNA export factor, ALYREF. The cryo-EM structure of CBC-ALYREF reveals that the RRM domain of ALYREF makes direct contact with both the NCBP1 and NCBP2 subunits of the CBC. Comparing CBC-ALYREF with other cellular complexes containing CBC and/or ALYREF components provides insights into the coordinated events during mRNA transcription, splicing, and export.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Julia Belyaeva, Matthias Elgeti
    Review Article

    Under physiological conditions, proteins continuously undergo structural fluctuations on different timescales. Some conformations are only sparsely populated, but still play a key role in protein function. Thus, meaningful structure–function frameworks must include structural ensembles rather than only the most populated protein conformations. To detail protein plasticity, modern structural biology combines complementary experimental and computational approaches. In this review, we survey available computational approaches that integrate sparse experimental data from electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy with molecular modeling techniques to derive all-atom structural models of rare protein conformations. We also propose strategies to increase the reliability and improve efficiency using deep learning approaches, thus advancing the field of integrative structural biology.