A Sec14-like phosphatidylinositol transfer protein paralog defines a novel class of heme-binding proteins

Abstract

Yeast Sfh5 is an unusual member of the Sec14-like phosphatidylinositol transfer protein (PITP) family. Whereas PITPs are defined by their abilities to transfer phosphatidylinositol between membranes in vitro, and to stimulate phosphoinositide signaling in vivo, Sfh5 does not exhibit these activities. Rather, Sfh5 is a redox-active penta-coordinate high spin FeIII hemoprotein with an unusual heme-binding arrangement that involves a co-axial tyrosine/histidine coordination strategy and a complex electronic structure connecting the open shell iron d-orbitals with three aromatic ring systems. That Sfh5 is not a PITP is supported by demonstrations that heme is not a readily exchangeable ligand, and that phosphatidylinositol-exchange activity is resuscitated in heme binding-deficient Sfh5 mutants. The collective data identify Sfh5 as the prototype of a new class of fungal hemoproteins, and emphasize the versatility of the Sec14-fold as scaffold for translating the binding of chemically distinct ligands to the control of diverse sets of cellular activities.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession code 6W32.All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Danish Khan

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0650-3990
  2. Dongju Lee

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Gulcin Gulten

    Biochemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Anup Aggarwal

    Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Joshua Wofford

    Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Inna Krieger

    Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ashutosh Tripathi

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. John W Patrick

    Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Debra M Eckert

    Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Arthur Laganowsky

    Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. James Sacchettini

    Biochemistry/Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5767-2367
  12. Paul Lindahl

    Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Vytas A Bankaitis

    molecular & cellular medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    For correspondence
    vytas@tamu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1654-6759

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM131804)

  • Vytas A Bankaitis

Welch Foundation (BE-0017)

  • Vytas A Bankaitis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Benoît Kornmann, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Version history

  1. Received: March 20, 2020
  2. Accepted: August 10, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 11, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 1, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Khan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,531
    views
  • 210
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Danish Khan
  2. Dongju Lee
  3. Gulcin Gulten
  4. Anup Aggarwal
  5. Joshua Wofford
  6. Inna Krieger
  7. Ashutosh Tripathi
  8. John W Patrick
  9. Debra M Eckert
  10. Arthur Laganowsky
  11. James Sacchettini
  12. Paul Lindahl
  13. Vytas A Bankaitis
(2020)
A Sec14-like phosphatidylinositol transfer protein paralog defines a novel class of heme-binding proteins
eLife 9:e57081.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57081

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57081

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Abdul Wasim, Sneha Menon, Jagannath Mondal
    Research Article

    Intrinsically disordered protein α-synuclein (αS) is implicated in Parkinson’s disease due to its aberrant aggregation propensity. In a bid to identify the traits of its aggregation, here we computationally simulate the multi-chain association process of αS in aqueous as well as under diverse environmental perturbations. In particular, the aggregation of αS in aqueous and varied environmental condition led to marked concentration differences within protein aggregates, resembling liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). Both saline and crowded settings enhanced the LLPS propensity. However, the surface tension of αS droplet responds differently to crowders (entropy-driven) and salt (enthalpy-driven). Conformational analysis reveals that the IDP chains would adopt extended conformations within aggregates and would maintain mutually perpendicular orientations to minimize inter-chain electrostatic repulsions. The droplet stability is found to stem from a diminished intra-chain interactions in the C-terminal regions of αS, fostering inter-chain residue-residue interactions. Intriguingly, a graph theory analysis identifies small-world-like networks within droplets across environmental conditions, suggesting the prevalence of a consensus interaction patterns among the chains. Together these findings suggest a delicate balance between molecular grammar and environment-dependent nuanced aggregation behavior of αS.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Sandeep K Ravala, Sendi Rafael Adame-Garcia ... John JG Tesmer
    Research Article

    PIP3-dependent Rac exchanger 1 (P-Rex1) is abundantly expressed in neutrophils and plays central roles in chemotaxis and cancer metastasis by serving as a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rac. The enzyme is synergistically activated by PIP3 and heterotrimeric Gβγ subunits, but mechanistic details remain poorly understood. While investigating the regulation of P-Rex1 by PIP3, we discovered that Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (IP4) inhibits P-Rex1 activity and induces large decreases in backbone dynamics in diverse regions of the protein. Cryo-electron microscopy analysis of the P-Rex1·IP4 complex revealed a conformation wherein the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain occludes the active site of the Dbl homology (DH) domain. This configuration is stabilized by interactions between the first DEP domain (DEP1) and the DH domain and between the PH domain and a 4-helix bundle (4HB) subdomain that extends from the C-terminal domain of P-Rex1. Disruption of the DH–DEP1 interface in a DH/PH-DEP1 fragment enhanced activity and led to a more extended conformation in solution, whereas mutations that constrain the occluded conformation led to decreased GEF activity. Variants of full-length P-Rex1 in which the DH–DEP1 and PH–4HB interfaces were disturbed exhibited enhanced activity during chemokine-induced cell migration, confirming that the observed structure represents the autoinhibited state in living cells. Interactions with PIP3-containing liposomes led to disruption of these interfaces and increased dynamics protein-wide. Our results further suggest that inositol phosphates such as IP4 help to inhibit basal P-Rex1 activity in neutrophils, similar to their inhibitory effects on phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase.