Acetylcholine is released in the basolateral amygdala in response to predictors of reward and enhances learning of cue-reward contingency

  1. Richard B Crouse
  2. Kristen Kim
  3. Hannah M Batchelor
  4. Eric M Girardi
  5. Rufina Kamaletdinova
  6. Justin Chan
  7. Prithviraj Rajebhosale
  8. Steven T Pittenger
  9. Lorna W Role
  10. David A Talmage
  11. Miao Jing
  12. Yulong Li
  13. Xiao-Bing Gao
  14. Yann S Mineur
  15. Marina R Picciotto  Is a corresponding author
  1. Yale University, United States
  2. NIH, United States
  3. Chinese Institute for Brain Research, China
  4. Peiking University, China
  5. Yale University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

The basolateral amygdala (BLA) is critical for associating initially neutral cues with appetitive and aversive stimuli and receives dense neuromodulatory acetylcholine (ACh) projections. We measured BLA ACh signaling and activity of neurons expressing CaMKIIα (a marker for glutamatergic principal cells) in mice during cue-reward learning using a fluorescent ACh sensor and calcium indicators. We found that ACh levels and nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM) cholinergic terminal activity in the BLA (NBM-BLA) increased sharply in response to reward-related events and shifted as mice learned the cue-reward contingency. BLA CaMKIIα neuron activity followed reward retrieval and moved to the reward-predictive cue after task acquisition. Optical stimulation of cholinergic NBM-BLA terminal fibers led to quicker acquisition of the cue-reward contingency. These results indicate BLA ACh signaling carries important information about salient events in cue-reward learning and provides a framework for understanding how ACh signaling contributes to shaping BLA responses to emotional stimuli.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all experiments on Dryad Digital Repository: doi:10.5061/dryad.3xsj3txcf

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Richard B Crouse

    Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9509-9263
  2. Kristen Kim

    Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hannah M Batchelor

    Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Eric M Girardi

    Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Rufina Kamaletdinova

    Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3650-8207
  6. Justin Chan

    Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Prithviraj Rajebhosale

    NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9893-3025
  8. Steven T Pittenger

    Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Lorna W Role

    NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5851-212X
  10. David A Talmage

    NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Miao Jing

    Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yulong Li

    School of Life Sciences, Peiking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Xiao-Bing Gao

    Program in Integrative Cell Signaling and Neurobiology of Metabolism, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Yann S Mineur

    Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Marina R Picciotto

    Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    marina.picciotto@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4404-1280

Funding

National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA14241)

  • Richard B Crouse
  • Kristen Kim
  • Hannah M Batchelor
  • Rufina Kamaletdinova
  • Justin Chan
  • Steven T Pittenger
  • Yann S Mineur
  • Marina R Picciotto

National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA037566)

  • Richard B Crouse
  • Kristen Kim
  • Hannah M Batchelor
  • Rufina Kamaletdinova
  • Justin Chan
  • Steven T Pittenger
  • Yann S Mineur
  • Marina R Picciotto

National Institute of Mental Health (MH077681)

  • Richard B Crouse
  • Kristen Kim
  • Hannah M Batchelor
  • Rufina Kamaletdinova
  • Justin Chan
  • Steven T Pittenger
  • Yann S Mineur
  • Marina R Picciotto

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS022061)

  • Prithviraj Rajebhosale
  • Lorna W Role
  • David A Talmage

National Institute of Mental Health (MH109104)

  • Prithviraj Rajebhosale
  • Lorna W Role
  • David A Talmage

National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA046160)

  • Xiao-Bing Gao

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (Intramural)

  • Prithviraj Rajebhosale
  • Lorna W Role

National Institute of Mental Health (Intramural)

  • Prithviraj Rajebhosale
  • David A Talmage

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32-NS007224)

  • Richard B Crouse

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were approved by the Yale University Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee in compliance with the National Institute of Health's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. (protocol: 2019-07895)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 7,261
    views
  • 867
    downloads
  • 83
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Richard B Crouse
  2. Kristen Kim
  3. Hannah M Batchelor
  4. Eric M Girardi
  5. Rufina Kamaletdinova
  6. Justin Chan
  7. Prithviraj Rajebhosale
  8. Steven T Pittenger
  9. Lorna W Role
  10. David A Talmage
  11. Miao Jing
  12. Yulong Li
  13. Xiao-Bing Gao
  14. Yann S Mineur
  15. Marina R Picciotto
(2020)
Acetylcholine is released in the basolateral amygdala in response to predictors of reward and enhances learning of cue-reward contingency
eLife 9:e57335.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57335

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57335

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Kayson Fakhar, Fatemeh Hadaeghi ... Claus C Hilgetag
    Research Article

    Efficient communication in brain networks is foundational for cognitive function and behavior. However, how communication efficiency is defined depends on the assumed model of signaling dynamics, e.g., shortest path signaling, random walker navigation, broadcasting, and diffusive processes. Thus, a general and model-agnostic framework for characterizing optimal neural communication is needed. We address this challenge by assigning communication efficiency through a virtual multi-site lesioning regime combined with game theory, applied to large-scale models of human brain dynamics. Our framework quantifies the exact influence each node exerts over every other, generating optimal influence maps given the underlying model of neural dynamics. These descriptions reveal how communication patterns unfold if regions are set to maximize their influence over one another. Comparing these maps with a variety of brain communication models showed that optimal communication closely resembles a broadcasting regime in which regions leverage multiple parallel channels for information dissemination. Moreover, we found that the brain’s most influential regions are its rich-club, exploiting their topological vantage point by broadcasting across numerous pathways that enhance their reach even if the underlying connections are weak. Altogether, our work provides a rigorous and versatile framework for characterizing optimal brain communication, and uncovers the most influential brain regions, and the topological features underlying their influence.

    1. Neuroscience
    Roshani Nhuchhen Pradhan, Craig Montell, Youngseok Lee
    Research Article

    The question as to whether animals taste cholesterol taste is not resolved. This study investigates whether the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, is capable of detecting cholesterol through their gustatory system. We found that flies are indifferent to low levels of cholesterol and avoid higher levels. The avoidance is mediated by gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs), demonstrating that flies can taste cholesterol. The cholesterol-responsive GRNs comprise a subset that also responds to bitter substances. Cholesterol detection depends on five ionotropic receptor (IR) family members, and disrupting any of these genes impairs the flies' ability to avoid cholesterol. Ectopic expressions of these IRs in GRNs reveals two classes of cholesterol receptors, each with three shared IRs and one unique subunit. Additionally, expressing cholesterol receptors in sugar-responsive GRNs confers attraction to cholesterol. This study reveals that flies can taste cholesterol, and that the detection depends on IRs in GRNs.