Met and Cxcr4 cooperate to protect skeletal muscle stem cells against inflammation-induced damage during regeneration

  1. Ines Lahmann
  2. Joscha Griger
  3. Jie-Shin Chen
  4. Yao Zhang
  5. Markus Schülke
  6. Carmen Birchmeier  Is a corresponding author
  1. Neurowissenschaftliches Forschungzentrum, NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
  2. Developmental Biology/Signal Transduction Group, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Society, Germany
  3. Department of Neuropediatrics, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
7 figures, 1 table and 2 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Expression of Tnf, Hgf, and Met during muscle regeneration.

(A, B) Expression dynamics of Tnf (A) and Hgf (B) in uninjured and regenerating muscle tissue determined by qPCR. (C) Expression dynamics of Hgf in quiescent and activated muscle stem cells and in muscle tissue during muscle regeneration determined by qPCR. (D) Expression levels of Met in quiescent and activated muscle stem cells determined by qPCR. Boxplots represent interquartile range, and whiskers show min-to-max range. β-Actin expression was used for normalization in (AD).

Figure 1—source data 1

Quantification of Tnf, Hgf and Met expression represented in the diagrams shown in A-D.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/57356/elife-57356-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Expression levels of Hgf in quiescent (freshly isolated) and proliferating muscle stem cells at various time points defined by microarray analysis (Liu et al., 2013; Latroche et al., 2017).

The microarray data sets were obtained from the GEO Database under the accession numbers GSE103684 and GSE47177. Symbols represent the mean of three independent biological replicates, error bars represent the standard deviation.

Mutation of Met impairs muscle regeneration.

(A–D) Immunohistological analysis of regenerating (7 days post injury [dpi] and 20 dpi) muscle of control and coMet mutants using antibodies against laminin (red) and sarcomeric myosin (green). DAPI was used as a counterstain. (E) Distribution of Feret fiber diameters in uninjured and regenerating muscle (7 dpi and 20 dpi) of control mice and coMet mutants. (F–I) Immunohistological analysis of regenerating muscle of control and TxGakaMet mice using antibodies against laminin (red) and sarcomeric myosin (green). DAPI was used as a counterstain. (J) Distribution of Feret fiber diameters in uninjured and regenerating muscle (7 dpi and 20 dpi) of control and TxGakaMet mice. (K–N) Immunohistological analysis of regenerating (7 dpi and 20 dpi) muscle of control and TxFanMet mice using antibodies against laminin (red) and sarcomeric myosin (green). DAPI was used as a counterstain. (O) Distribution of Feret fiber diameters in uninjured and regenerating (7 dpi and 20 dpi) muscle of control and TxFanMet mice. Scale bars, 100 µm. In (AE) control: Pax7iresCre/+;Met+/+; coMet: Pax7iresCre/+;Metflox/flox. In (FJ) control: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Met+/+; TxGakaMet: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Metflox/flox; In (KO) control: Pax7CreERT2Fan/+;Met+/+; TxFanMet: Pax7CreERT2Fan/+;Metflox/flox. Animals in (FO) were treated with tamoxifen.

Figure 2—source data 1

Quantification of fiber diameters represented in the diagrams shown in E, J and O.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/57356/elife-57356-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Mutation of Met reduces the muscle stem cell pool during regeneration.

(A–D) Immunohistological analysis of uninjured and regenerating (7 days post injury [dpi]) muscle of control and coMet mice using antibodies against laminin (red) and PAX7 (green). DAPI was used as a counterstain. (E, F) Quantification of PAX7+ cells in uninjured and regenerating muscle from control and coMet mice. (G–J) Immunohistological analysis of uninjured and regenerating (7 dpi) muscle from control and TxGakaMet mice using antibodies against laminin (red) and Pax7 (green). DAPI was used as a counterstain. (K, L) Quantification of PAX7+ cells in uninjured and regenerating muscle of control and TxGakaMet mice. (M–P) Immunohistological analysis of uninjured and regenerating (7 dpi) muscle from control and TxFanMet mice using antibodies against laminin (red) and Pax7 (green). DAPI was used as a counterstain. (Q, R) Quantification of PAX7+ cells in uninjured and regenerating (7 dpi) muscle from control and TxFanMet mice. Arrowheads point to PAX7+ cells. Scale bars 100 µm. In (AF) control: Pax7iresCre/+;Met+/+; coMet: Pax7iresCre/+;Metflox/flox. In (GL) control: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Met+/+; TxGakaMet: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Metflox/flox. In (MR) control: Pax7CreERT2Fan/+;Met+/+; TxFanMet: Pax7CreERT2Fan/+;Metflox/flox. Animals in (GR) were treated with tamoxifen.

Figure 3—source data 1

Quantification of PAX7+ cells represented in the diagrams shown in E, F, K, L, Q and R (Figure 3).

Quantification of recombination efficiency of the Metflox allele represented in the diagrams shown in B, C and D (Figure 3—figure supplement 1).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/57356/elife-57356-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Recombination efficiency and schematic drawing of the different Pax7Cre alleles.

(A) Cartoon showing the unspliced transcripts from the Metflox allele before and after Cre-dependent excision of exon 17. Arrows mark position of qPCR primers used to determine the recombination efficiency. (B–D) Transcript levels generated from the Metflox allele before and after recombination using Pax7iresCre (B), Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka (C), and Pax7CreERT2Fan (D) in isolated muscle stem cells quantified by qPCR. β-Actin expression was used for normalization. (E) Cartoon showing the Cre alleles used to recombine muscle stem cells in this work. Genotypes of controls are in (B) Metflox/flox, in (C), Metflox/flox treated with tamoxifen, and in (D) Metflox/flox treated with tamoxifen.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Expression of Cxcl12 and Cxcr4 during regeneration.

(A) Expression dynamics of Cxcl12 in uninjured and regenerating muscle tissue determined by qPCR. (B) Expression levels of Cxcl12 in quiescent and activated muscle stem cells and in muscle tissue during muscle regeneration determined by qPCR. (C) Expression levels of Cxcr4 in quiescent and activated muscle stem cells determined by qPCR. Boxplots represent interquartile range, whiskers show min-to-max range. β-Actin expression was used for normalization in (AC).

Figure 4—source data 1

Quantification of Cxcl12 and Cxcr4 expression represented in the diagrams shown in A-C.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/57356/elife-57356-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Expression levels of Cxcl12 in quiescent (freshly isolated) and proliferating muscle stem cells at various time points defined by microarray analysis (Liu et al., 2013; Latroche et al., 2017).

The microarray data sets were obtained from the GEO Database under the accession numbers GSE103684 and GSE47177. Symbols represent the mean of three independent biological replicates, error bars represent the standard deviation.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements
Cxcr4 and Met cooperate during muscle regeneration.

(A–D) Immunohistological analysis of regenerating (7 days post injury [dpi]) muscle of control, TxGakaCxcr4, TxGakaMet, and TxGakaCxcr4;Met mice using antibodies against laminin (red) and sarcomeric myosin (green). DAPI was used as a counterstain. Control and mutant animals had been treated with tamoxifen. (E) Distribution of Ferret fiber diameters in uninjured and regenerating (7 dpi) muscle of control, TxGakaCxcr4, TxGakaMet, and TxGakaCxcr4;Met mice. (F–I) Immunohistological analysis of regenerating (7 dpi) muscle of control animals, TxGakaCxcr4, TxGakaMet, and TxGakaCxcr4;Met mutants using antibodies against laminin (green) and Pax7 (red). DAPI was used as a counterstain. Arrowheads in (H, I) point to PAX7+ cells. (J) Quantification of PAX7+ cells in regenerating muscle of control, TxGakaCxcr4 and TxGakaMet mice, and TxGakaCxcr4;Met double mutants. Scale bars, 50 µm (A–D), 30 µm (F–I). Control: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+; TxGakaCxcr4: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Cxcr4flox/flox; TxGakaMet: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Metflox/flox; TxGakaCxcr4;Met: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Cxcr4flox/flox;Metflox/flox. All animals were treated with tamoxifen.

Figure 5—source data 1

Quantification of fiber diameters, PAX7+ cells and fibrotic area represented in the diagrams shown in E, J (Figure 5), E (Figure 5—figure supplement 1) and E, F (Figure 5—figure supplement 2).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/57356/elife-57356-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Mutations of Cxcr4 and Met in muscle stem cells did not affect muscle stem cell numbers.

(A–D) Immunohistological analysis of uninjured muscle of control, TxGakaCxcr4, TxGakaMet, andTxGakaCxcr4;Met mice using antibodies against laminin (red) and PAX7 (green). DAPI was used as a counterstain. (E) Quantification of PAX7+ cells in uninjured muscle. Scale bars: 30 µm. Genotype of control is Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+, treated with tamoxifen.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2
Increased fibrosis in the regenerating muscle of Met and Cxcr4;Met mutants.

(A–D, A′–D′) Immunohistological analysis of regenerating muscle at 7 days post injury (dpi) of control, TxGakaCxcr4, TxGakaMet, and TxGakaCxcr4;Met mutants using antibodies against F4/80 (red in AD, white in A′D′) and CollagenIV (green). DAPI was used as a counterstain. (E) Quantifications of F4/80+ stained area and (F) fibronectin-positive area in the regenerating muscle. Scale bars, 100 µm. Genotype of control is Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+, treated with tamoxifen.

Figure 6 with 2 supplements
Cxcr4;Met mutant muscle stem cells undergo apoptosis after acute injury.

(A–D, A′–D′) Immunohistological analysis of apoptotic cells. PAX7 antibody staining (red) was combined with TUNEL assay (green) to identify apoptotic muscle stem cells in injured muscle of control, TxGakaCxcr4, TxGakaMet, and TxGakaCxcr4;Met mice at 4 days post injury (dpi). DAPI was used as a counterstain in (A–D). Arrowheads point to TUNEL+ PAX7+ cells. (E) Quantification of PAX7+ TUNEL+ cells in regenerating muscle of control, TxGakaCxcr4, TxGakaMet, and TxGakaCxcr4;Met mutants. (F) Quantification of PAX7+ cells in regenerating muscle of control, TxGakaCxcr4, TxGakaMet, and TxGakaCxcr4;Met mice. Scale bars, 20 µm. Control: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+; TxGakaCxcr4: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Cxcr4flox/flox; TxGakaMet: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Metflox/flox; TxGakaCxcr4;Met: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Cxcr4flox/flox;Metflox/flox. All animals were treated with tamoxifen.

Figure 6—source data 1

Quantification of PAX7+TUNEL+ and PAX7+ cells represented in the diagrams shown in E and F (Figure 6).

Quantification of EdU+PAX7+ cells represented in the diagram shown in E (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Quantification of MYOG+ and PAX7+ cells represented in the diagrams shown in E and F (Figure 6—figure supplement 2).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/57356/elife-57356-fig6-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Enhanced proliferation of PAX7+ cells in Cxcr4;Met mutants during regeneration.

(A–D) Identification of proliferating muscle stem cells by EdU incorporation in regenerating muscle of (A) control, (B) TxGakaCxcr4, (C) TxGakaMet, and (D) TxGakaCxcr4;Met mice at 4 days post injury (dpi) using antibodies against EdU (green) and PAX7 (red). DAPI was used as a counterstain. Arrowheads point to EdU+ PAX7+ muscle stem cells in regenerating muscle. (A′–D′) show the Pax7 channel, (A′′–D′′) show the EdU channel of images in (A–D). (E) Quantification of the proliferating EdU+ PAX7+ cells. Scale bars, 20 µm. Genotype of control is Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+, treated with tamoxifen.

Figure 6—figure supplement 2
Differentiation is mildly enhanced in Met and Cxcr4;Met mutants during regeneration.

(A–D) Identification of differentiating myogenic cells in regenerating muscle of (A) control, (B) TxGakaCxcr4, (C) TxGakaMet, and (D) TxGakaCxcr4;Met mice at 4 days post injury (dpi) using antibodies against Myogenin (green) and PAX7 (red). DAPI was used as a counterstain. (E) Number of Myogenin+ cells/mm2 and (F) quantification of the proportion of cells that express PAX7 and/or Myogenin. Scale bars, 20 µm. Genotype of control is Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+, treated with tamoxifen.

Figure 7 with 1 supplement
CXCL12 and HGF protect muscle cells from TNFα-induced cell death.

(A–C) Primary muscle stem cells were isolated and cultured for 3 hr in the presence of TNFα plus/minus HGF and Cxcl12. Apoptotic cells were identified by TUNEL staining. (D) Quantification of TUNEL+ cells present in such cultures. (E, F) Immunohistological analysis of muscle stem cells (PAX7+, red) and apoptotic cells (TUNEL staining, green) in injured muscle (4 days post injury [dpi]) of control mice treated with TNFα neutralizing antibodies or control IgG 2 hr before acute injury. DAPI was used as a counterstain. (G) Quantification of PAX7+ cells in regenerating muscle (4 dpi) of control mice treated with TNFα neutralizing antibodies or control IgG. (H) Quantification of PAX7+ TUNEL+ cells in regenerating muscle (4 dpi) of control mice treated with TNFα neutralizing antibodies or control IgG. (I, J) Immunohistological analysis of muscle stem cells (PAX7+, red) and apoptotic cells (TUNEL staining, green) in injured muscle (4 dpi) of TxGakaMet mutants treated with TNFα neutralizing antibodies or control IgG 2 hr before acute injury. DAPI was used as a counterstain. (K) Quantification of PAX7+ cells in regenerating (4 dpi) muscle of TxGakaMet mice treated with TNFα neutralizing antibodies or control IgG. (L) Quantification of PAX7+ TUNEL+ cells in regenerating muscle from TxGakaMet mice treated with TNFα neutralizing antibodies or control IgG. (M, N) Immunohistological analysis of muscle stem cells (PAX7+, red) and apoptotic cells (TUNEL staining, green) in injured muscle (4 dpi) of TxGakaCxcr4;Met mutants treated with TNFα neutralizing antibodies or control IgG 2 hr before acute injury. DAPI was used as a counterstain. (O) Quantification of PAX7+ cells in regenerating muscle (4 dpi) of TxGakaCxcr4;Met mice treated with TNFα neutralizing antibodies or control IgG. (P) Quantification of PAX7+ TUNEL+ cells in regenerating muscle (4 dpi) of TxGakaCxcr4;Met mice treated with TNFα neutralizing antibodies or control IgG. Scale bars, 20 µm. Control: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+; TxGakaMet: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Metflox/flox; TxGakaCxcr4;Met: Pax7iresCreERT2Gaka/+;Cxcr4flox/flox;Metflox/flox. All animals were treated with tamoxifen.

Figure 7—source data 1

Quantification of TUNEL+, PAX7+ and PAX7+TUNEL+ cells represented in the diagrams shown in D, G, H, K, L, O and P (Figure 7).

Quantification of TUNEL+ cells represented in the diagram shown in Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/57356/elife-57356-fig7-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 7—figure supplement 1
Neutralizing capacity of TNFα antibody used in Figure 7.

C2C12 cells were cultured for 24 hr in the presence of TNFα plus/minus different concentration of neutralizing TNFα antibody. Apoptotic cells were identified by TUNEL staining and quantified.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
AntibodyGuinea pig polyclonal anti-PAX7Our labPMID:229401131:2500
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-LamininSigma-AldrichL9393RRID:AB_4771631:500
AntibodyGoat polyclonalanti-CollagenIVMilliporeAB769RRID:AB_922621:500
AntibodyMouse monoclonalanti-sarcomeric myosinDSHBMF20RRID:AB_21477811:10
AntibodyRabbit polyclonalanti-MyogeninAbcamab124800RRID:AB_109718491:1000
AntibodyMouse monoclonal anti-F4/80Abcamab6640RRID:AB_11400401:100
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-fibronectinSigma-AldrichF7387RRID:AB_4769881:500
AntibodyCy2, Cy3, Cy5 conjugated antibodiesDianova1:500
Commercial assay or kitIn Situ Cell Death Detection KitRoche12156792910
Commercial assay or kitEdUbaseclick GmbHBCK-EdU647
Commercial Assay or kitqPCR SYBR Green MixThermoFisherAB1158B
Sequence-based reagentATCCACGATGTTCATGAGAGEurofinsN/AqPCR HGF (forward primer)
Sequence-based reagentGCTGACTGCATTTCTCATTCEurofinsN/AqPCR HGF (reverse primer)
Sequence-based reagentCACAGAAAGCATGATCCGCGACGTEurofinsN/AqPCR TNF (forward primer)
Sequence-based reagentCGGCAGAGAGGAGGTTGACTTTCTEurofinsN/AqPCR TNF (reverse primer)
Sequence-based reagentCAGAGCCAACGTCAAGCAEurofinsN/AqPCR Cxcl12 (forward primer)
Sequence-based reagentAGGTACTCTTGGATCCACEurofinsN/AqPCR Cxcl12 (reverse primer)
Sequence-based reagentCATTTTGGCTGTGTCTATCATGEurofinsN/AqPCR Met (forward primer)
Sequence-based reagentACTCCTCAGGCAGATTCCCEurofinsN/AqPCR Met (reverse primer)
Sequence-based reagentTCAGTGGCTGACCTCCTCTTEurofinsN/AqPCR CXCR4 (forward primer)
Sequence-based reagentCTTGGCCTTTGACTGTTGGTEurofinsN/AqPCR CXCR4 (reverse primer)
Sequence-based reagentCATTTTGGCTGTGTCTATCATGEurofinsN/AqPCR Met Exon 17 (forward primer)
Sequence-based reagentACTCCTCAGGCAGATTCCCEurofinsN/AqPCR Met Exon 18 (reverse primer)
Sequence-based reagentCTTGCCAGAGACATGTACGATEurofinsN/AqPCR Met Exon 20 (forward primer)
Sequence-based reagentAGGAGCACACCAAAGGACCAEurofinsN/AqPCR Met Exon 21 (reverse primer)
Sequence-based reagentCCAGTTGGTAACAATGCCATGTEurofinsN/AqPCR β-actin (forward primer)
Sequence-based reagentGGCTGTATTCCCCTCCATCGEurofinsN/AqPCR β-actin (reverse primer)
Sequence-based reagentACTAGGCTCCACTCTGTCCTTCEurofinsPMID:19554048Genotyping PCR-Primer 1 Pax7CreERT2Fan
Sequence-based reagentGCAGATGTAGGGACATTCCAGTGEurofinsPMID:19554048Genotyping PCR-Primer 2 Pax7CreERT2Fan
Sequence-based reagentGCTGCTGTTGATTACCTGGCEurofinsPMID:21828091Genotyping PCR-Primer 1 Pax7CreERT2GaKa
Sequence-based reagentCTGCACTGAGACAGGACCGEurofinsPMID:21828091Genotyping PCR-Primer 2 Pax7CreERT2GaKa
Sequence-based reagentGCTGCTGTTGATTACCTGGCEurofinsPMID:21828091Genotyping PCR-Primer 1 Pax7CreERT2GaKa
Sequence-based reagentGCTCTGGATACACCTGAGTCTEurofinsPMID:15520281Genotyping PCR-Primer 1 Pax7-IRESCre
Sequence-based reagentGGATAGTGAAACAGGGGCAAEurofinsPMID:15520281Genotyping PCR-Primer 2 Pax7-IRESCre
Sequence-based reagentTCGGCCTTCTTCTAGGTTCTGCTCEurofinsPMID:15520281Genotyping PCR-Primer 3 Pax7-IRESCre
Sequence-based reagentCCACCCAGGACAGTGTGACTCTAAEurofinsPMID:15520246Genotyping PCR-Primer 1 Cxcr4 flox
Sequence-based reagentGATGGGATTCTGTATGAGGATTAGCEurofinsPMID:15520246Genotyping PCR-Primer 2 Cxcr4 flox
Sequence-based reagentCCAAGTGTCTGACGGCTGTGEurofinsN/AGenotyping PCR-Primer 1 Met flox
Sequence-based reagentAGCCTAGTGGAATTCTCTGTAAGEurofinsN/AGenotyping PCR-Primer 2 Met flox

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Tnf, Hgf, and Cxcl12 expression levels during muscle regeneration.

Expression levels of Tnf, Hgf, and Cxcl12 mRNA after acute injury were determined in the entire muscle by qPCR. Uninjured and 1–7 days post injury (dpi) were assessed, and expression was normalized to the expression in the uninjured muscle. The values are displayed as means ± SEM. p-Values are shown in brackets. β-Actin was used for normalization.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/57356/elife-57356-supp1-v2.xlsx
Transparent reporting form
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/57356/elife-57356-transrepform1-v2.docx

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ines Lahmann
  2. Joscha Griger
  3. Jie-Shin Chen
  4. Yao Zhang
  5. Markus Schülke
  6. Carmen Birchmeier
(2021)
Met and Cxcr4 cooperate to protect skeletal muscle stem cells against inflammation-induced damage during regeneration
eLife 10:e57356.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57356