Tissue resident macrophages promote extracellular matrix homeostasis in the mammary gland stroma of nulliparous mice

  1. Ying Wang
  2. Thomas S Chaffee
  3. Rebecca S LaRue
  4. Danielle N Huggins
  5. Patrice M Witschen
  6. Ayman M Ibrahim
  7. Andrew C Nelson
  8. Heather L Machado
  9. Kathryn L Schwertfeger  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Minnesota, United States
  2. Tulane University, United States
  3. Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Tissue resident macrophages in the mammary gland are found in close association with epithelial structures and within the adipose stroma, and are important for mammary gland development and tissue homeostasis. While macrophages have been linked to ductal development in the virgin mammary gland, less is known regarding the effects of macrophages on the adipose stroma. Using transcriptional profiling and single cell RNA sequencing approaches, we identify a distinct resident stromal macrophage subpopulation within the mouse nulliparous mammary gland characterized by expression of Lyve-1, a receptor for the extracellular matrix (ECM) component hyaluronan. This subpopulation is enriched in genes associated with ECM remodeling and is specifically associated with hyaluronan-rich regions within the adipose stroma and fibrous capsule of the virgin mammary gland. Furthermore, macrophage depletion leads to enhanced accumulation of hyaluronan-associated ECM in the adipose-associated stroma, indicating that resident macrophages are important for maintaining homeostasis within the nulliparous mammary gland stroma.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE148207 and GSE148209.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ying Wang

    Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Thomas S Chaffee

    Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rebecca S LaRue

    Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Danielle N Huggins

    Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Patrice M Witschen

    Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ayman M Ibrahim

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Andrew C Nelson

    Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Heather L Machado

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kathryn L Schwertfeger

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    For correspondence
    schwe251@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9755-7774

Funding

National Institutes of Health (T 32 fellowship,OD010993)

  • Patrice M Witschen

American Cancer Society (Post-doctoral fellowship,132570-PF-18-140-01-CSM)

  • Danielle N Huggins

American Cancer Society (Clinical Scholar Development Grant,132574-CSDG-18-139-01-CSM)

  • Andrew C Nelson

National Institutes of Health (R01CA212518)

  • Heather L Machado

National Institutes of Health (R01HD095858)

  • Kathryn L Schwertfeger

National Institutes of Health (R01CA235385)

  • Kathryn L Schwertfeger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal care and procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Minnesota (protocol #1909-37381A) and Tulane University (protocol #710) and were in accordance with the procedures detailed in the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Human subjects: The study was approved for exemption (#00008356) by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Minnesota and all patients had accepted the institutional standard consent for research utilization of clinical data and samples. All patient materials were de-identified following standard protocols.

Copyright

© 2020, Wang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,586
    views
  • 686
    downloads
  • 67
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ying Wang
  2. Thomas S Chaffee
  3. Rebecca S LaRue
  4. Danielle N Huggins
  5. Patrice M Witschen
  6. Ayman M Ibrahim
  7. Andrew C Nelson
  8. Heather L Machado
  9. Kathryn L Schwertfeger
(2020)
Tissue resident macrophages promote extracellular matrix homeostasis in the mammary gland stroma of nulliparous mice
eLife 9:e57438.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57438

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57438

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Kara A Nelson, Kari F Lenhart ... Stephen DiNardo
    Research Article

    Niches are often found in specific positions in tissues relative to the stem cells they support. Consistency of niche position suggests that placement is important for niche function. However, the complexity of most niches has precluded a thorough understanding of how their proper placement is established. To address this, we investigated the formation of a genetically tractable niche, the Drosophila Posterior Signaling Center (PSC), the assembly of which had not been previously explored. This niche controls hematopoietic progenitors of the lymph gland (LG). PSC cells were previously shown to be specified laterally in the embryo, but ultimately reside dorsally, at the LG posterior. Here, using live-imaging, we show that PSC cells migrate as a tight collective and associate with multiple tissues during their trajectory to the LG posterior. We find that Slit emanating from two extrinsic sources, visceral mesoderm and cardioblasts, is required for the PSC to remain a collective, and for its attachment to cardioblasts during migration. Without proper Slit-Robo signaling, PSC cells disperse, form aberrant contacts, and ultimately fail to reach their stereotypical position near progenitors. Our work characterizes a novel example of niche formation and identifies an extrinsic signaling relay that controls precise niche positioning.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Rachael Kuintzle, Leah A Santat, Michael B Elowitz
    Research Article

    The Notch signaling pathway uses families of ligands and receptors to transmit signals to nearby cells. These components are expressed in diverse combinations in different cell types, interact in a many-to-many fashion, both within the same cell (in cis) and between cells (in trans), and their interactions are modulated by Fringe glycosyltransferases. A fundamental question is how the strength of Notch signaling depends on which pathway components are expressed, at what levels, and in which cells. Here, we used a quantitative, bottom-up, cell-based approach to systematically characterize trans-activation, cis-inhibition, and cis-activation signaling efficiencies across a range of ligand and Fringe expression levels in Chinese hamster and mouse cell lines. Each ligand (Dll1, Dll4, Jag1, and Jag2) and receptor variant (Notch1 and Notch2) analyzed here exhibited a unique profile of interactions, Fringe dependence, and signaling outcomes. All four ligands were able to bind receptors in cis and in trans, and all ligands trans-activated both receptors, although Jag1-Notch1 signaling was substantially weaker than other ligand-receptor combinations. Cis-interactions were predominantly inhibitory, with the exception of the Dll1- and Dll4-Notch2 pairs, which exhibited cis-activation stronger than trans-activation. Lfng strengthened Delta-mediated trans-activation and weakened Jagged-mediated trans-activation for both receptors. Finally, cis-ligands showed diverse cis-inhibition strengths, which depended on the identity of the trans-ligand as well as the receptor. The map of receptor-ligand-Fringe interaction outcomes revealed here should help guide rational perturbation and control of the Notch pathway.