Tissue resident macrophages promote extracellular matrix homeostasis in the mammary gland stroma of nulliparous mice

  1. Ying Wang
  2. Thomas S Chaffee
  3. Rebecca S LaRue
  4. Danielle N Huggins
  5. Patrice M Witschen
  6. Ayman M Ibrahim
  7. Andrew C Nelson
  8. Heather L Machado
  9. Kathryn L Schwertfeger  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Minnesota, United States
  2. Tulane University, United States
  3. Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Tissue resident macrophages in the mammary gland are found in close association with epithelial structures and within the adipose stroma, and are important for mammary gland development and tissue homeostasis. While macrophages have been linked to ductal development in the virgin mammary gland, less is known regarding the effects of macrophages on the adipose stroma. Using transcriptional profiling and single cell RNA sequencing approaches, we identify a distinct resident stromal macrophage subpopulation within the mouse nulliparous mammary gland characterized by expression of Lyve-1, a receptor for the extracellular matrix (ECM) component hyaluronan. This subpopulation is enriched in genes associated with ECM remodeling and is specifically associated with hyaluronan-rich regions within the adipose stroma and fibrous capsule of the virgin mammary gland. Furthermore, macrophage depletion leads to enhanced accumulation of hyaluronan-associated ECM in the adipose-associated stroma, indicating that resident macrophages are important for maintaining homeostasis within the nulliparous mammary gland stroma.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE148207 and GSE148209.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ying Wang

    Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Thomas S Chaffee

    Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Rebecca S LaRue

    Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Danielle N Huggins

    Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Patrice M Witschen

    Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ayman M Ibrahim

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Andrew C Nelson

    Lab Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Heather L Machado

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kathryn L Schwertfeger

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    For correspondence
    schwe251@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9755-7774

Funding

National Institutes of Health (T 32 fellowship,OD010993)

  • Patrice M Witschen

American Cancer Society (Post-doctoral fellowship,132570-PF-18-140-01-CSM)

  • Danielle N Huggins

American Cancer Society (Clinical Scholar Development Grant,132574-CSDG-18-139-01-CSM)

  • Andrew C Nelson

National Institutes of Health (R01CA212518)

  • Heather L Machado

National Institutes of Health (R01HD095858)

  • Kathryn L Schwertfeger

National Institutes of Health (R01CA235385)

  • Kathryn L Schwertfeger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Carla V Rothlin, Yale School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal care and procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Minnesota (protocol #1909-37381A) and Tulane University (protocol #710) and were in accordance with the procedures detailed in the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Human subjects: The study was approved for exemption (#00008356) by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Minnesota and all patients had accepted the institutional standard consent for research utilization of clinical data and samples. All patient materials were de-identified following standard protocols.

Version history

  1. Received: March 31, 2020
  2. Accepted: May 31, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 1, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 16, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: July 2, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Wang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,065
    views
  • 641
    downloads
  • 53
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ying Wang
  2. Thomas S Chaffee
  3. Rebecca S LaRue
  4. Danielle N Huggins
  5. Patrice M Witschen
  6. Ayman M Ibrahim
  7. Andrew C Nelson
  8. Heather L Machado
  9. Kathryn L Schwertfeger
(2020)
Tissue resident macrophages promote extracellular matrix homeostasis in the mammary gland stroma of nulliparous mice
eLife 9:e57438.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57438

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57438

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Arya Y Nakhe, Prasanna K Dadi ... David A Jacobson
    Research Article

    The gain-of-function mutation in the TALK-1 K+ channel (p.L114P) is associated with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). TALK-1 is a key regulator of β-cell electrical activity and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. The KCNK16 gene encoding TALK-1 is the most abundant and β-cell-restricted K+ channel transcript. To investigate the impact of KCNK16 L114P on glucose homeostasis and confirm its association with MODY, a mouse model containing the Kcnk16 L114P mutation was generated. Heterozygous and homozygous Kcnk16 L114P mice exhibit increased neonatal lethality in the C57BL/6J and the CD-1 (ICR) genetic background, respectively. Lethality is likely a result of severe hyperglycemia observed in the homozygous Kcnk16 L114P neonates due to lack of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and can be reduced with insulin treatment. Kcnk16 L114P increased whole-cell β-cell K+ currents resulting in blunted glucose-stimulated Ca2+ entry and loss of glucose-induced Ca2+ oscillations. Thus, adult Kcnk16 L114P mice have reduced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and plasma insulin levels, which significantly impairs glucose homeostasis. Taken together, this study shows that the MODY-associated Kcnk16 L114P mutation disrupts glucose homeostasis in adult mice resembling a MODY phenotype and causes neonatal lethality by inhibiting islet insulin secretion during development. These data suggest that TALK-1 is an islet-restricted target for the treatment for diabetes.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Arne Elofsson, Ling Han ... Luca Jovine
    Research Article

    A crucial event in sexual reproduction is when haploid sperm and egg fuse to form a new diploid organism at fertilization. In mammals, direct interaction between egg JUNO and sperm IZUMO1 mediates gamete membrane adhesion, yet their role in fusion remains enigmatic. We used AlphaFold to predict the structure of other extracellular proteins essential for fertilization to determine if they could form a complex that may mediate fusion. We first identified TMEM81, whose gene is expressed by mouse and human spermatids, as a protein having structural homologies with both IZUMO1 and another sperm molecule essential for gamete fusion, SPACA6. Using a set of proteins known to be important for fertilization and TMEM81, we then systematically searched for predicted binary interactions using an unguided approach and identified a pentameric complex involving sperm IZUMO1, SPACA6, TMEM81 and egg JUNO, CD9. This complex is structurally consistent with both the expected topology on opposing gamete membranes and the location of predicted N-glycans not modeled by AlphaFold-Multimer, suggesting that its components could organize into a synapse-like assembly at the point of fusion. Finally, the structural modeling approach described here could be more generally useful to gain insights into transient protein complexes difficult to detect experimentally.