The neurotransmitter acetylcholine influences how male finches perform courtship songs by acting on a region of the premotor cortex called HVC.
Acetylcholine is a neurotransmitter that helps organisms filter the vast amounts of information received from the environment. In the sensory cortex, it acts by fine-tuning the activity of neurons to heighten attention, which helps with learning and memory (Sarter and Lustig, 2019; Lee and Dan, 2012; Picciotto et al., 2012).
Heightened attention also boosts the precision and speed of movements (Song, 2019). Previous research in this area has focused on neuromodulation in the basal ganglia, a group of neural structures in the forebrain that help to select, initiate, maintain, and adapt motor actions (Berke, 2018; Mink, 1996; Turner and Desmurget, 2010). For example, dopamine is an important neurotransmitter in this region, and its loss is associated with movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. Disrupting acetylcholine signaling also leads to problems with movement, yet the influence of acetylcholine on motor performance is not fully understood (Conner et al., 2010). Now, in eLife, Paul Jaffe and Michael Brainard from the University of California, San Francisco report the results of experiments on songbirds that shed light on the relationship between acetylcholine, arousal, and motor performance (Jaffe and Brainard, 2020).
The team took advantage of the fact that male Bengalese finches naturally alter their song performance depending on their audience. Each male has his own song that he rehearses alone. However, when aroused and courting a female, the male produces a song that is more stereotypical (less variable), longer, and faster (Figure 1A; Sakata et al., 2008). Several specialized neural circuits – some in the cortex, and some in the basal ganglia – are required to learn and produce songs. Researchers can monitor and manipulate these circuits with precision to understand their function (Sakata and Woolley, 2020).
First, Jaffe and Brainard focused on a premotor cortical region called HVC, where they locally infused a drug that mimics the effects of acetylcholine. As a result, males started to sing as if a female were present: songs were faster, louder, and less variable during drug infusion than in control conditions (Figure 1B). Neurons in HVC also started to show the same type of pattern observed during courtship singing towards females – there was, in particular, neural activity increased. Together, these experiments suggest that acetylcholine plays a role in shaping singing behavior in a social context.
Next, they assessed whether differences in behaviour in the presence and absence of a female normally depend on acetylcholine. To this end, Jaffe and Brainard blocked specific acetylcholine receptors, leading to courtship songs in the presence of females becoming lower in pitch, more variable, and altogether more similar to songs performed alone (Figure 1B). Decreasing acetylcholine activity in HVC therefore weakened the vigor of courtship singing, revealing that acetylcholine can drive changes in the brain that energize male performances towards females.
In the brains of songbirds, HVC is connected to the region that controls vocal motor outputs both directly and through a separate circuit that goes through the basal ganglia. Jaffe and Brainard therefore set out to determine which of these pathways acetylcholine acts on to enhance the vigor of the song. They disrupted the circuit that connects the basal ganglia to the vocal output region and showed that, in this context, increased acetylcholine activity in HVC still produced the same enhanced singing behavior (Figure 1C). This demonstrates that acetylcholine can invigorate song performance even without the basal ganglia being involved.
From songbirds to humans, many vertebrates rely on ‘prosodic cues’ such as pitch and tempo to convey motivations and emotions during communication (Pell et al., 2009; Sakata and Vehrencamp, 2012). Knowing how acetylcholine heightens motor performance sheds light on the neural circuits that underlie the production of these cues. Other chemicals, such as dopamine and norepinephrine, also fine-tune the activity of neurons in motor circuits. In the future, understanding how acetylcholine interacts with these neurotransmitters, both in overlapping and independent regions, will be necessary to fully grasp how arousal influences motor behavior.
The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programsProgress in Neurobiology 50:381–425.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00042-1
Social modulation of sequence and syllable variability in adult birdsongJournal of Neurophysiology 99:1700–1711.https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01296.2007
Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistencyJournal of Experimental Biology 215:201–209.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.056911
Cholinergic double duty: cue detection and attentional controlCurrent Opinion in Psychology 29:102–107.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.026
The role of attention in motor control and learningCurrent Opinion in Psychology 29:261–265.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.002
Basal ganglia contributions to motor control: a vigorous tutorCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology 20:704–716.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.022
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Recent studies of the Central Complex in the brain of the fruit fly have identified neurons with activity that tracks the animal’s heading direction. These neurons are part of a neuronal circuit with dynamics resembling those of a ring attractor. The homologous circuit in other insects has similar topographic structure but with significant structural and connectivity differences. We model the connectivity patterns of two insect species to investigate the effect of these differences on the dynamics of the circuit. We illustrate that the circuit found in locusts can also operate as a ring attractor but differences in the inhibition pattern enable the fruit fly circuit to respond faster to heading changes while additional recurrent connections render the locust circuit more tolerant to noise. Our findings demonstrate that subtle differences in neuronal projection patterns can have a significant effect on circuit performance and illustrate the need for a comparative approach in neuroscience.
The representation of position in the mammalian brain is distributed across multiple neural populations. Grid cell modules in the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) express activity patterns that span a low-dimensional manifold which remains stable across different environments. In contrast, the activity patterns of hippocampal place cells span distinct low-dimensional manifolds in different environments. It is unknown how these multiple representations of position are coordinated. Here we develop a theory of joint attractor dynamics in the hippocampus and the MEC. We show that the system exhibits a coordinated, joint representation of position across multiple environments, consistent with global remapping in place cells and grid cells. In addition, our model accounts for recent experimental observations that lack a mechanistic explanation: variability in the firing rate of single grid cells across firing fields, and artificial remapping of place cells under depolarization, but not under hyperpolarization, of layer II stellate cells of the MEC.