Epithelial colonies in vitro elongate through collective effects

  1. Jordi Comelles
  2. Soumya S S
  3. Linjie Lu
  4. Emilie Le-Maout
  5. Sudakar Anvitha
  6. Guillaume Salbreux
  7. Frank Jülicher
  8. Mandar M Inamdar  Is a corresponding author
  9. Daniel Riveline  Is a corresponding author
  1. Laboratory of Cell Physics ISIS/IGBMC, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, France
  2. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
  3. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  4. Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Germany

Abstract

Epithelial tissues of the developing embryos elongate by different mechanisms, such as neighbor exchange, cell elongation, and oriented cell division. Since autonomous tissue self-organization is influenced by external cues such as morphogen gradients or neighboring tissues, it is difficult to distinguish intrinsic from directed tissue behavior. The mesoscopic processes leading to the different mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we study the spontaneous elongation behavior of spreading circular epithelial colonies in vitro. By quantifying deformation kinematics at multiple scales, we report that global elongation happens primarily due to cell elongations, and its direction correlates with the anisotropy of the average cell elongation. By imposing an external time-periodic stretch, the axis of this global symmetry breaking can be modified and elongation occurs primarily due to orientated neighbor exchange. These different behaviors are confirmed using a vertex model for collective cell behavior, providing a framework for understanding autonomous tissue elongation and its origins.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jordi Comelles

    Development and stem cells, Laboratory of Cell Physics ISIS/IGBMC, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, Illkirch CEDEX, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Soumya S S

    Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Linjie Lu

    Development and stem cells, Laboratory of Cell Physics ISIS/IGBMC, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, Illkirch CEDEX, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Emilie Le-Maout

    Development and stem cells, Laboratory of Cell Physics ISIS/IGBMC, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, Illkirch CEDEX, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sudakar Anvitha

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Guillaume Salbreux

    Theoretical Physics of Biology, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7041-1292
  7. Frank Jülicher

    Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4731-9185
  8. Mandar M Inamdar

    Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
    For correspondence
    minamdar@iitb.ac.in
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Daniel Riveline

    Development and stem cells, Laboratory of Cell Physics ISIS/IGBMC, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, Illkirch CEDEX, France
    For correspondence
    riveline@unistra.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4632-011X

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (BT/06/IYBA/2012)

  • Mandar M Inamdar

Cancer Research UK (FC001317)

  • Guillaume Salbreux

Medical Research Council (FC001317)

  • Guillaume Salbreux

Wellcome Trust (FC001317)

  • Guillaume Salbreux

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT)

  • Guillaume Salbreux
  • Daniel Riveline

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-IDEX-0002-02)

  • Daniel Riveline

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Comelles et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,034
    views
  • 511
    downloads
  • 36
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jordi Comelles
  2. Soumya S S
  3. Linjie Lu
  4. Emilie Le-Maout
  5. Sudakar Anvitha
  6. Guillaume Salbreux
  7. Frank Jülicher
  8. Mandar M Inamdar
  9. Daniel Riveline
(2021)
Epithelial colonies in vitro elongate through collective effects
eLife 10:e57730.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57730

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57730

Further reading

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    James E Hammond, Ruth E Baker, Berta Verd
    Research Article

    Vertebrates have evolved great diversity in the number of segments dividing the trunk body, however, the developmental origin of the evolvability of this trait is poorly understood. The number of segments is thought to be determined in embryogenesis as a product of morphogenesis of the pre-somitic mesoderm (PSM) and the periodicity of a molecular oscillator active within the PSM known as the segmentation clock. Here, we explore whether the clock and PSM morphogenesis exhibit developmental modularity, as independent evolution of these two processes may explain the high evolvability of segment number. Using a computational model of the clock and PSM parameterised for zebrafish, we find that the clock is broadly robust to variation in morphogenetic processes such as cell ingression, motility, compaction, and cell division. We show that this robustness is in part determined by the length of the PSM and the strength of phase coupling in the clock. As previous studies report no changes to morphogenesis upon perturbing the clock, we suggest that the clock and morphogenesis of the PSM exhibit developmental modularity.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Emmanuel Akabuogu, Victor Carneiro da Cunha Martorelli ... Thomas A Waigh
    Research Article

    Bacterial biofilms are communities of bacteria usually attached to solid strata and often differentiated into complex structures. Communication across biofilms has been shown to involve chemical signaling and, more recently, electrical signaling in Gram-positive biofilms. We report for the first time, community-level synchronized membrane potential dynamics in three-dimensional Escherichia coli biofilms. Two hyperpolarization events are observed in response to light stress. The first requires mechanically sensitive ion channels (MscK, MscL, and MscS) and the second needs the Kch-potassium channel. The channels mediated both local spiking of single E. coli biofilms and long-range coordinated electrical signaling in E. coli biofilms. The electrical phenomena are explained using Hodgkin-Huxley and 3D fire-diffuse-fire agent-based models. These data demonstrate that electrical wavefronts based on potassium ions are a mechanism by which signaling occurs in Gram-negative biofilms and as such may represent a conserved mechanism for communication across biofilms.