Epithelial colonies in vitro elongate through collective effects

  1. Jordi Comelles
  2. Soumya S S
  3. Linjie Lu
  4. Emilie Le-Maout
  5. Sudakar Anvitha
  6. Guillaume Salbreux
  7. Frank Jülicher
  8. Mandar M Inamdar  Is a corresponding author
  9. Daniel Riveline  Is a corresponding author
  1. Laboratory of Cell Physics ISIS/IGBMC, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, France
  2. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
  3. The Francis Crick Institute, United Kingdom
  4. Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Germany

Abstract

Epithelial tissues of the developing embryos elongate by different mechanisms, such as neighbor exchange, cell elongation, and oriented cell division. Since autonomous tissue self-organization is influenced by external cues such as morphogen gradients or neighboring tissues, it is difficult to distinguish intrinsic from directed tissue behavior. The mesoscopic processes leading to the different mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we study the spontaneous elongation behavior of spreading circular epithelial colonies in vitro. By quantifying deformation kinematics at multiple scales, we report that global elongation happens primarily due to cell elongations, and its direction correlates with the anisotropy of the average cell elongation. By imposing an external time-periodic stretch, the axis of this global symmetry breaking can be modified and elongation occurs primarily due to orientated neighbor exchange. These different behaviors are confirmed using a vertex model for collective cell behavior, providing a framework for understanding autonomous tissue elongation and its origins.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jordi Comelles

    Development and stem cells, Laboratory of Cell Physics ISIS/IGBMC, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, Illkirch CEDEX, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Soumya S S

    Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Linjie Lu

    Development and stem cells, Laboratory of Cell Physics ISIS/IGBMC, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, Illkirch CEDEX, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Emilie Le-Maout

    Development and stem cells, Laboratory of Cell Physics ISIS/IGBMC, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, Illkirch CEDEX, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Sudakar Anvitha

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Guillaume Salbreux

    Theoretical Physics of Biology, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7041-1292
  7. Frank Jülicher

    Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4731-9185
  8. Mandar M Inamdar

    Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
    For correspondence
    minamdar@iitb.ac.in
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Daniel Riveline

    Development and stem cells, Laboratory of Cell Physics ISIS/IGBMC, CNRS and University of Strasbourg, Illkirch CEDEX, France
    For correspondence
    riveline@unistra.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4632-011X

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (BT/06/IYBA/2012)

  • Mandar M Inamdar

Cancer Research UK (FC001317)

  • Guillaume Salbreux

Medical Research Council (FC001317)

  • Guillaume Salbreux

Wellcome Trust (FC001317)

  • Guillaume Salbreux

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT)

  • Guillaume Salbreux
  • Daniel Riveline

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-IDEX-0002-02)

  • Daniel Riveline

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Irene Giardina, Università Sapienza, Italy

Version history

  1. Received: April 9, 2020
  2. Accepted: December 31, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 4, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: February 1, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Comelles et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,696
    views
  • 471
    downloads
  • 26
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jordi Comelles
  2. Soumya S S
  3. Linjie Lu
  4. Emilie Le-Maout
  5. Sudakar Anvitha
  6. Guillaume Salbreux
  7. Frank Jülicher
  8. Mandar M Inamdar
  9. Daniel Riveline
(2021)
Epithelial colonies in vitro elongate through collective effects
eLife 10:e57730.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57730

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57730

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Taegon Chung, Iksoo Chang, Sangyeol Kim
    Research Article

    Locomotion is a fundamental behavior of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Previous works on kinetic simulations of animals helped researchers understand the physical mechanisms of locomotion and the muscle-controlling principles of neuronal circuits as an actuator part. It has yet to be understood how C. elegans utilizes the frictional forces caused by the tension of its muscles to perform sequenced locomotive behaviors. Here, we present a two-dimensional rigid body chain model for the locomotion of C. elegans by developing Newtonian equations of motion for each body segment of C. elegans. Having accounted for friction-coefficients of the surrounding environment, elastic constants of C. elegans, and its kymogram from experiments, our kinetic model (ElegansBot) reproduced various locomotion of C. elegans such as, but not limited to, forward-backward-(omega turn)-forward locomotion constituting escaping behavior and delta-turn navigation. Additionally, ElegansBot precisely quantified the forces acting on each body segment of C. elegans to allow investigation of the force distribution. This model will facilitate our understanding of the detailed mechanism of various locomotive behaviors at any given friction-coefficients of the surrounding environment. Furthermore, as the model ensures the performance of realistic behavior, it can be used to research actuator-controller interaction between muscles and neuronal circuits.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Giulio Facchini, Alann Rathery ... Andrea Perna
    Research Article

    Termites build complex nests which are an impressive example of self-organization. We know that the coordinated actions involved in the construction of these nests by multiple individuals are primarily mediated by signals and cues embedded in the structure of the nest itself. However, to date there is still no scientific consensus about the nature of the stimuli that guide termite construction, and how they are sensed by termites. In order to address these questions, we studied the early building behavior of Coptotermes gestroi termites in artificial arenas, decorated with topographic cues to stimulate construction. Pellet collections were evenly distributed across the experimental setup, compatible with a collection mechanism that is not affected by local topography, but only by the distribution of termite occupancy (termites pick pellets at the positions where they are). Conversely, pellet depositions were concentrated at locations of high surface curvature and at the boundaries between different types of substrate. The single feature shared by all pellet deposition regions was that they correspond to local maxima in the evaporation flux. We can show analytically and we confirm experimentally that evaporation flux is directly proportional to the local curvature of nest surfaces. Taken together, our results indicate that surface curvature is sufficient to organize termite building activity and that termites likely sense curvature indirectly through substrate evaporation. Our findings reconcile the apparently discordant results of previous studies.