Long-term potentiation is independent of the C-tail of the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit

  1. Javier Díaz-Alonso  Is a corresponding author
  2. Wade Morishita
  3. Salvatore Incontro
  4. Jeffrey Simms
  5. Julia Holtzman
  6. Michael Gill
  7. Lennart Mucke
  8. Robert C Malenka
  9. Roger A Nicoll  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. Stanford University, United States
  3. Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, United States
  4. University of California, San Francisco, United States

Abstract

We tested the proposal that the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the AMPAR subunit GluA1 is required for LTP. We found that a knock-in mouse lacking the CTD of GluA1 expresses normal LTP and spatial memory, assayed by the Morris water maze. Our results support a model in which LTP generates synaptic slots, which capture passively diffusing AMPARs.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Javier Díaz-Alonso

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    Javier.DiazAlonso@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4980-7441
  2. Wade Morishita

    Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Salvatore Incontro

    Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jeffrey Simms

    Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Julia Holtzman

    Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Michael Gill

    Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Lennart Mucke

    Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Robert C Malenka

    Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Roger A Nicoll

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    roger.nicoll@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6977-4632

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (K99MH118425)

  • Javier Díaz-Alonso

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070957)

  • Roger A Nicoll

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH117139)

  • Roger A Nicoll

National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH086403)

  • Robert C Malenka

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The authors declare that this study has been performed strictly following all relevant laboratory animal use regulations according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols of the University of California, San Francisco (AN170318 and AN183289), and Stanford University (10322).

Copyright

© 2020, Díaz-Alonso et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,690
    views
  • 492
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Javier Díaz-Alonso
  2. Wade Morishita
  3. Salvatore Incontro
  4. Jeffrey Simms
  5. Julia Holtzman
  6. Michael Gill
  7. Lennart Mucke
  8. Robert C Malenka
  9. Roger A Nicoll
(2020)
Long-term potentiation is independent of the C-tail of the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit
eLife 9:e58042.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58042

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58042

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Nico A Flierman, Sue Ann Koay ... Chris I De Zeeuw
    Research Article

    The role of cerebellum in controlling eye movements is well established, but its contribution to more complex forms of visual behavior has remained elusive. To study cerebellar activity during visual attention we recorded extracellular activity of dentate nucleus (DN) neurons in two non-human primates (NHPs). NHPs were trained to read the direction indicated by a peripheral visual stimulus while maintaining fixation at the center, and report the direction of the cue by performing a saccadic eye movement into the same direction following a delay. We found that single-unit DN neurons modulated spiking activity over the entire time course of the task, and that their activity often bridged temporally separated intra-trial events, yet in a heterogeneous manner. To better understand the heterogeneous relationship between task structure, behavioral performance, and neural dynamics, we constructed a behavioral, an encoding, and a decoding model. Both NHPs showed different behavioral strategies, which influenced the performance. Activity of the DN neurons reflected the unique strategies, with the direction of the visual stimulus frequently being encoded long before an upcoming saccade. Moreover, the latency of the ramping activity of DN neurons following presentation of the visual stimulus was shorter in the better performing NHP. Labeling with the retrograde tracer Cholera Toxin B in the recording location in the DN indicated that these neurons predominantly receive inputs from Purkinje cells in the D1 and D2 zones of the lateral cerebellum as well as neurons of the principal olive and medial pons, all regions known to connect with neurons in the prefrontal cortex contributing to planning of saccades. Together, our results highlight that DN neurons can dynamically modulate their activity during a visual attention task, comprising not only sensorimotor but also cognitive attentional components.

    1. Neuroscience
    Robert A Bruce, Matthew Weber ... Kumar Narayanan
    Research Article

    The role of striatal pathways in cognitive processing is unclear. We studied dorsomedial striatal cognitive processing during interval timing, an elementary cognitive task that requires mice to estimate intervals of several seconds and involves working memory for temporal rules as well as attention to the passage of time. We harnessed optogenetic tagging to record from striatal D2-dopamine receptor-expressing medium spiny neurons (D2-MSNs) in the indirect pathway and from D1-dopamine receptor-expressing MSNs (D1-MSNs) in the direct pathway. We found that D2-MSNs and D1-MSNs exhibited distinct dynamics over temporal intervals as quantified by principal component analyses and trial-by-trial generalized linear models. MSN recordings helped construct and constrain a four-parameter drift-diffusion computational model in which MSN ensemble activity represented the accumulation of temporal evidence. This model predicted that disrupting either D2-MSNs or D1-MSNs would increase interval timing response times and alter MSN firing. In line with this prediction, we found that optogenetic inhibition or pharmacological disruption of either D2-MSNs or D1-MSNs increased interval timing response times. Pharmacologically disrupting D2-MSNs or D1-MSNs also changed MSN dynamics and degraded trial-by-trial temporal decoding. Together, our findings demonstrate that D2-MSNs and D1-MSNs had opposing dynamics yet played complementary cognitive roles, implying that striatal direct and indirect pathways work together to shape temporal control of action. These data provide novel insight into basal ganglia cognitive operations beyond movement and have implications for human striatal diseases and therapies targeting striatal pathways.