Long-term potentiation is independent of the C-tail of the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit

  1. Javier Díaz-Alonso  Is a corresponding author
  2. Wade Morishita
  3. Salvatore Incontro
  4. Jeffrey Simms
  5. Julia Holtzman
  6. Michael Gill
  7. Lennart Mucke
  8. Robert C Malenka
  9. Roger A Nicoll  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. Stanford University, United States
  3. Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, United States
  4. University of California, San Francisco, United States

Abstract

We tested the proposal that the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the AMPAR subunit GluA1 is required for LTP. We found that a knock-in mouse lacking the CTD of GluA1 expresses normal LTP and spatial memory, assayed by the Morris water maze. Our results support a model in which LTP generates synaptic slots, which capture passively diffusing AMPARs.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Javier Díaz-Alonso

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    Javier.DiazAlonso@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4980-7441
  2. Wade Morishita

    Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Salvatore Incontro

    Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jeffrey Simms

    Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Julia Holtzman

    Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Michael Gill

    Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Lennart Mucke

    Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Robert C Malenka

    Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Roger A Nicoll

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    roger.nicoll@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6977-4632

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (K99MH118425)

  • Javier Díaz-Alonso

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070957)

  • Roger A Nicoll

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH117139)

  • Roger A Nicoll

National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH086403)

  • Robert C Malenka

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The authors declare that this study has been performed strictly following all relevant laboratory animal use regulations according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols of the University of California, San Francisco (AN170318 and AN183289), and Stanford University (10322).

Copyright

© 2020, Díaz-Alonso et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,694
    views
  • 493
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Javier Díaz-Alonso
  2. Wade Morishita
  3. Salvatore Incontro
  4. Jeffrey Simms
  5. Julia Holtzman
  6. Michael Gill
  7. Lennart Mucke
  8. Robert C Malenka
  9. Roger A Nicoll
(2020)
Long-term potentiation is independent of the C-tail of the GluA1 AMPA receptor subunit
eLife 9:e58042.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58042

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58042

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jill R Turner, Jocelyn Martin
    Insight

    Reversing opioid overdoses in rats using a drug that does not enter the brain prevents the sudden and severe withdrawal symptoms associated with therapeutics that target the central nervous system.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ilya A Rybak, Natalia A Shevtsova ... Alain Frigon
    Research Advance

    Locomotion is controlled by spinal circuits that interact with supraspinal drives and sensory feedback from the limbs. These sensorimotor interactions are disrupted following spinal cord injury. The thoracic lateral hemisection represents an experimental model of an incomplete spinal cord injury, where connections between the brain and spinal cord are abolished on one side of the cord. To investigate the effects of such an injury on the operation of the spinal locomotor network, we used our computational model of cat locomotion recently published in eLife (Rybak et al., 2024) to investigate and predict changes in cycle and phase durations following a thoracic lateral hemisection during treadmill locomotion in tied-belt (equal left-right speeds) and split-belt (unequal left-right speeds) conditions. In our simulations, the ‘hemisection’ was always applied to the right side. Based on our model, we hypothesized that following hemisection the contralesional (‘intact’, left) side of the spinal network is mostly controlled by supraspinal drives, whereas the ipsilesional (‘hemisected’, right) side is mostly controlled by somatosensory feedback. We then compared the simulated results with those obtained during experiments in adult cats before and after a mid-thoracic lateral hemisection on the right side in the same locomotor conditions. Our experimental results confirmed many effects of hemisection on cat locomotion predicted by our simulations. We show that having the ipsilesional hindlimb step on the slow belt, but not the fast belt, during split-belt locomotion substantially reduces the effects of lateral hemisection. The model provides explanations for changes in temporal characteristics of hindlimb locomotion following hemisection based on altered interactions between spinal circuits, supraspinal drives, and somatosensory feedback.