Discovery of surrogate agonists for visceral fat Treg cells that modulate metabolic indices in vivo

  1. Ricardo A Fernandes
  2. Chaoran Li
  3. Gang Wang
  4. Xinbo Yang
  5. Christina S Savvides
  6. Caleb R Glassman
  7. Shen Dong
  8. Eric Luxenberg
  9. Leah V Sibener
  10. Michael E Birnbaum
  11. Christophe Benoist
  12. Diane Mathis  Is a corresponding author
  13. K Christopher Garcia  Is a corresponding author
  1. Departments of Molecular and Cellular Physiology and Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Department of Immunology, Harvard Medical School; and Evergrande Center for Immunologic Diseases, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, United States
  3. Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University School of Engineering, United States
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States
7 figures, 1 table and 2 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 2 supplements
Development of a peptide-Ab yeast library.

(A) A degenerate codon with maximum diversity at TCR-facing positions (blue) and optimal residues at anchor positions (red) was used to generate a peptide-MHC yeast library containing up to 1 × 109 peptides. (B) To validate the library a proxy TCR of known specificity, YAe, was used to perform four consecutive rounds of selection. (C) Enriched yeast clones were isolated at all steps and deep-sequenced following appropriate plasmid purification and PCR amplification in order to quantify the peptide frequency. The top eight enriched peptides found in the fourth round of YAe selection are shown. (D) Positional frequency matrix based on the deep sequence of the fourth round of selection.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Evolution of peptide-Ab yeast display.

(A) Cartoon representation and protein sequence used for the peptide-Ab yeast display. (B) TCR tetramer staining of the naïve library and the four consecutive rounds of yeast selection using the YAe TCR. The peptide-Ab library was generated following the random mutagenesis by error-prone PCR of the construct shown in (A). (C) Size exclusion chromatography of the vTreg53 TCR following purification by Ni-NTA column and overnight biotinylation using BirA enzyme. (D) Reducing and non-reducing SDS-PAGE of the vTreg53 TCR fractions collected in (C).

Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Validation of the peptide-Ab yeast display platform.

(A) 2W TCR tetramer staining together with c-myc staining is shown for the naïve library and four consecutive rounds of selection of the peptide-Ab yeast library. TCR tetramer and c-myc staining of enriched peptide sequences (single clones) isolated from the YAe (B) or 2W (C) TCR selections. Naïve library, 3 k peptide and single point mutations (red) in central positions of the enriched peptides were used as controls to confirm the specificity of the peptide-Ab/TCR SA interaction.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Identification of surrogate peptides recognized by the vTreg53 TCR.

(A) The vTreg53 TCR was used to screen and isolate the peptide-MHC yeast display. vTreg53 TCR tetramer staining (500 nM of TCR-SA) together with c-Myc staining is shown for the naïve library and four consecutive rounds of selection. (B) Deep sequencing of the fourth round of selection reveals a small subset of peptides which share key residues at TCR facing positions (shown in green). (C) Positional frequency representation from the deep sequencing of the third round of selection with vTreg53. (D) Positional frequency matrix based on the deep sequencing of the fourth round of the peptide-MHC yeast selection. (E) A single peptide-MHC yeast clone, displaying the top enriched peptide, LMFKGPHAVQAVG (Fat 7; right panel; left panel shows staining for Eα control peptide), shows a positive Fat-TCR tetramer staining (500 nM final tetramer concentration). Data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Evolution of peptide-Ab yeast display.

(A) Size exclusion chromatography of the vTreg53 TCR following purification by Ni-NTA column and overnight biotinylation using BirA enzyme. (B) Reducing and non-reducing SDS-PAGE of the vTreg53 TCR fractions collected in (A).

Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Identification of robust vTreg53 TCR agonists.

Single-point mutants based on the Fat7 (A) or Fat15 (B) peptides were used to stimulate Fat-TCR transduced Jurkat T cells. Data shown are mean fluorescence intensity for CD69 up-regulation following overnight stimulation with the indicated peptides at 100 µM. (C) Potent SPs based on Fat15. Single-residue mutations from the Fat15 are shown in red. Anchor positions are shown in grey and potential TCR-facing positions are shown in green. A peptide titration of single- and double-point mutants from the Fat15 SP show up to ~4- (D; CD69) or ~8 fold (E; CD25) increase in Emax. (F) Surface plasmon resonance for Fat7, Fat15, Fat1562 and Fat2564 was used to determine the pMHC/Fat TCR affinity. All biotinylated pMHC were purified by SEC and immobilized in a streptavidin-coated SPR sensor chip from 200 up to 600 RU. Data are mean ± SD from n = 2 (A, D, E) or 3 (B) biological replicates from 1 representative of 3 independent experiments. Data shown in (F) is representative of 2 independent experiments.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
In vitro peptide stimulation of the vTreg53 TCR cells.

(A) Expression of wild-type Ab MHC in stably transduced K562 cells. (B) Expression of vTreg53 TCR in stably transduced Jurkat T cells (TCRαβ-/-). (C) Fraction of CD25+/CD69+ cells following overnight stimulation with Fat mimotopes at the indicated concentrations. (D) Peptide-Ab - streptavidin PE (pAb -SAPE) titration of vTreg53 transduced Jurkat T cells. Cells were stained with 250 nM of pAb-SAPE tetramer for 1 hr. (C, D) Data are mean ± SD from n = 2 biological replicates from 1 representative of 3 independent experiments.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
SPs induce proliferation and activation of vTreg53 Treg cells in vitro and in vivo.

(A–D) Proliferation and activation of vTreg53 Treg cells by different concentrations of SPs for 3 days in vitro (n = 3). (A) Representative flow cytometric plot of cell division. (B) Summary of cell proliferation. (C) Mean flourescence intensity (MFI) of CD44 staining in clonotype+ Treg cells. (D) MFI of CD62L staining in clonotype+ Treg cells. (E) Proliferation of transferred CD45.2+ vTreg53 Treg cells in the spleen of CD45.1+ B6 recipient mice immunized s.c. with CFA or CFA/Fat1562 at day 3 (n = 3). (F) Expansion of transferred CD45.2+ vTreg53 Treg cells in the Spl/LNs or VAT of CD45.1+ B6 recipient mice that were primed with CFA/fat1562 s.c. and boosted with IFA/Fat1562 i.p. (n ≥ 3). Data are mean ± SD. Data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Single cell TCR sequencing (scTCR-seq) analyses of fat1562-reactive endogenous Treg cells following immunization.

(A) Scheme of the experiment. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of fat1562/Ab -PE tetramer+ Treg cells in Spl/LNs (enriched by anti-PE beads) or VAT (not enriched) of mice immunized with adjuvant alone or adjuvant/fat1562. Plot is a representative of mice that did show detectable expansion of tetramer+ Tregs. (C) Numbers of fat1562/Ab -PE tetramer+ Treg cells in Spl/LNs or VAT of mice immunized with adjuvant alone or adjuvant/fat1562 (D) Summary of the frequency and CDR3 sequences of expanded fat1562/Ab -PE tetramer+ Treg clones.

Transcriptional analyses of vTreg53 Treg cells stimulated by Fat1562 in vivo.

(A–C) CD45.2+ vTreg53 Treg cells were transferred i.v. into CD45.1+ B6 mice. 6 weeks later, the recipient mice were immunized with CFA alone or CFA/Fat1562 s.c., and one week later, boosted with IFA alone or IFA/Fat1562 i.p. CD45.2+ clonotype+ Treg cells were sorted from Spl/LNs or VAT of the recipient mice one week later for RNA-Seq. (A) Volcano plot comparing gene expression of transferred clonotype+ Treg cells in the VAT and Spl/LNs of recipient mice immunized with adjuvant alone (left) or with adjuvant/Fat1562 (right). VAT-Treg signature genes are highlighted in red (induced) or blue (repressed). The number of genes from each signature preferentially expressed by one or the other population are shown at the top. (B) GSEA analysis of top KEGG pathways (p<0.05) that are enriched in cells activated by adjuvant/Fat1562 compared with adjuvant alone in VAT (left) or Spl/LN (right). NES, normalized enrichment score. FDR, false discovery rate. (C) Normalized reads of Pparg transcript in CD45.2+ clonotype+ Treg cells sorted from mice immunized with adjuvant alone or adjuvant/Fat1562. Data are mean ± SD. (D) Volcano plot comparing gene expression of transferred clonotype+ Treg cells in mice immunized with adjuvant/Fat1562 and adjuvant alone in the VAT (left) and spleen (right). Representative transcripts are highlighted.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement
Immunization with Fat1562 expands transferred vTreg53 Treg cells and suppresses HFD-induced VAT inflammation.

(A) Scheme of the transfer and immunization protocol. (B) Frequencies of CD45.2+ cells in Treg cells (n ≥ 7). (C) Frequencies of clonotype+ cells in transferred CD45.2+ Treg cells (n ≥ 7). (D) Number of clonotype+ CD45.2+ Treg cells in the spleen (n ≥ 7). (E) Number of clonotype+ CD45.2+ Treg cells in the VAT (n ≥ 7). (F) Number of total Treg cells in the spleen (n ≥ 7). (G) Number of total Treg cells in VAT (n ≥ 7). (H) Numbers of eosinophils and CD11chi inflammatory macrophages in VAT (n ≥ 7). Data are mean ± SD. Data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Gating strategy.

Gating strategy used for detection of VAT Treg cells (top) and, eosinophils or macrophage cells (bottom) by flow cytometry.

Figure 7 with 1 supplement
Immunization with Fat1562 following vTreg53 Treg transfer ameliorates HFD-induced insulin resistance.

(A–F) Metabolic indices of mice treated as in Figure 6A (n ≥ 7). (A) Body weight. (B) Insulin tolerance test (ITT). (C) Area over curve for ITT analysis. (D) Glucose tolerance test (GTT). (E) Area under curve for GTT analysis. (F) Plasma insulin levels after 6 hr of fasting. Data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments. (G) Scheme of the anti-TNFα experiment. (H) Number of total Treg cells in VAT (n ≥ 5). (I) Number of CD11chi inflammatory macrophages in VAT (n ≥ 5). (J) ITT (n ≥ 5). (K) Area over curve for ITT analysis (n ≥ 5). Data are mean ± SD.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1
Absolute blood glucose levels.

ITT analysis of mice transferred with vTreg53 TCR-tg Tregs and immunized with adjuvant/Fat1562 or adjuvant alone. Data shown are representative of at least two independent experiments (n ≥ 5).

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type
(species) or resource
DesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional
information
Genetic reagent (Mus. musculus)C57BL/6(J)Jackson labStock No: 000664
Genetic reagent (Mus. musculus)CD45.1.
C57BL/6
Jackson labStock No: 002014
Genetic reagent (Mus. musculus)vTreg53 TCR-tgLi et al., 2018
Genetic reagent (Mus. musculus)Foxp3-GFPGift of Vijay. Kuchroo, (Brigham and Women’s Hospital)
Cell line
(Homo sapiens)
Jurkat E6.1ATCCCat# TIB-152 RRID:CVCL_0367
Cell line
(Homo sapiens)
Lenti-X 293TTakara BioCat# 632180
Cell line
(Homo sapiens)
K-562ATCCCat# CCL-243, RRID:CVCL_0004
Antibodyanti-CD45.1 (clone A20)BiolegendCat# 110724
RRID:AB_493733
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD45.2 (clone 104)BiolegendCat# 109824
RRID:AB_830789
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD3 (clone 17A2)BiolegendCat#: 100214
RRID:AB_493645
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD4 (clone GK1.5)BiolegendCat#: 100422
RRID:AB_312707
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-TCR Vα2 (clone B20.1)BiolegendCat#: 127806
RRID:AB_1134188
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD44 (clone IM7)BiolegendCat#: 103032
AB_2076204
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD62L (clone MEL-14)BiolegendCat#: 104418
RRID:AB_313103
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD45 (clone 30-F11)BiolegendCat#: 103126
RRID:AB_493535
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD11b (clone M1/70)BiolegendCat#: 101228
RRID:AB_893232
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD11c (clone N418)BiolegendCat#: 117318
RRID:AB_493568
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-F4/80 (clone BM8)BiolegendCat#: 123116
RRID:AB_893481
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-c-Myc Alexa Fluor 488Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 9402
RRID:AB_2151827
FACS
(1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD69 (clone FN40)BiolegendCat# 104508, RRID:AB_313111FACS
(1:100)
Antibodyanti-CD25 (clone M-A25)BiolegendCat# 356110, RRID:AB_2561977FACS
(1:100)
Recombinant proteinStreptavidin APCBiolegendCat#: 405243FACS
(40–400 nM)
Antibodyanti-TCR Vβ4 (KT4)BD BiosciencesCat#: 553366
RRID:AB_394812
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-Siglec-F (E50-2440)BD BiosciencesCat#: 552126
RRID:AB_394341
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-Foxp3 (clone FJK-16s)ThermoFisherCat#: 17-5773-82
RRID:AB_469457
FACS (1:100)
Antibodyanti-TNFα (clone XT3.11)BioXCellCat#: BE0058
RRID:AB_1107764
In vivo 10 μg/g
antibodyisotype control IgG (clone HRPN)BioXCellCat#: BE0088
RRID:AB_1107775
In vivo 10 μg/g
Commercial assay or kitStreptavidin microbeadsMiltenyiCat#: 130-048-10150 μl/sample
Commercial assay or kitFoxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer SetThermoFisherCat#: 00-5523-00
Commercial assay or kitCellTrace Violet dyeThermoFisherCat#: C34557
Commercial assay or kitUltra Sensitive Mouse Insulin ELISA KitCrystal ChemCat#: 90080
Chemical compound, drugD-(+)-GlucoseSigma AldrichCat#: G8270-1KG
Chemical compound, drugHumulin RLillyCat#: U-100
Chemical compound, drugFreund’s Adjuvant, CompleteSigmaCat#: F5881
Chemical compound, drugFreund’s Adjuvant, IncompleteSigmaCat#: F5506
Software, algorithmMultiplot StudioGenepatternhttps://www.genepattern.org/modules/docs/Multiplot/2
Software, algorithmGSEABroad Institutehttps://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/index.jsp
Software, algorithmV-QUESTIMGThttp://www.imgt.org/IMGT_vquest/user_guide

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ricardo A Fernandes
  2. Chaoran Li
  3. Gang Wang
  4. Xinbo Yang
  5. Christina S Savvides
  6. Caleb R Glassman
  7. Shen Dong
  8. Eric Luxenberg
  9. Leah V Sibener
  10. Michael E Birnbaum
  11. Christophe Benoist
  12. Diane Mathis
  13. K Christopher Garcia
(2020)
Discovery of surrogate agonists for visceral fat Treg cells that modulate metabolic indices in vivo
eLife 9:e58463.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58463