Reconstruction of natural images from responses of primate retinal ganglion cells

  1. Nora Brackbill  Is a corresponding author
  2. Colleen Rhoades
  3. Alexandra Kling
  4. Nishal Pradeepbhai Shah
  5. Alexander Sher
  6. Alan M Litke
  7. E J Chichilnisky
  1. Stanford University, United States
  2. University of California, Santa Cruz, United States
  3. Stanford School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

The visual message conveyed by a retinal ganglion cell (RGC) is often summarized by its spatial receptive field, but in principle also depends on the responses of other RGCs and natural image statistics. This possibility was explored by linear reconstruction of natural images from responses of the four numerically-dominant macaque RGC types. Reconstructions were highly consistent across retinas. The optimal reconstruction filter for each RGC – its visual message – reflected natural image statistics, and resembled the receptive field only when nearby, same-type cells were included. ON and OFF cells conveyed largely independent, complementary representations, and parasol and midget cells conveyed distinct features. Correlated activity and nonlinearities had statistically significant but minor effects on reconstruction. Simulated reconstructions, using linear-nonlinear cascade models of RGC light responses that incorporated measured spatial properties and nonlinearities, produced similar results. Spatiotemporal reconstructions exhibited similar spatial properties, suggesting that the results are relevant for natural vision.

Data availability

Code and data to generate all of the summary plots are included in the supporting files. We are not able to release the raw voltage recordings, which total >5 TBs and require a complex processing pipeline. This paper is only the first analysis using these large data sets, which were collected over many years, and are still in use by students in our lab for other projects and papers funded by grants that were used to acquire them in a lab-wide collaboration. We will be happy to work directly with specific researchers to release additional data to them for the purposes of replication only, but not for further use, until we have had an opportunity to complete our analysis of the data and the PhD students doing this work have been able to publish their findings.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nora Brackbill

    Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    nbrackbill@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0308-1382
  2. Colleen Rhoades

    Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexandra Kling

    Neurosurgery; Ophthalmology; Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nishal Pradeepbhai Shah

    Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1275-0381
  5. Alexander Sher

    Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Alan M Litke

    Institute for Particle Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3973-3642
  7. E J Chichilnisky

    Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5613-0248

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF IGERT 0801700)

  • Nora Brackbill

National Science Foundation (CRCNS Grant IIS-1430348)

  • E J Chichilnisky

National Science Foundation (GRFP DGE-114747)

  • Nora Brackbill
  • Colleen Rhoades

National Eye Institute (F31EY027166)

  • Colleen Rhoades

Pew Charitable Trusts (Fellowship in Biomedical Sciences)

  • Alexander Sher

John Chen (donation)

  • Alan M Litke

National Institutes of Health (R01EY017992)

  • E J Chichilnisky

National Institutes of Health (R01-EY029247)

  • E J Chichilnisky

National Eye Institute (R01-EY029247)

  • E J Chichilnisky

National Institutes of Health (CRCNS Grant IIS-1430348)

  • E J Chichilnisky

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experimentation: Eyes were removed from terminally anesthetized macaque monkeys (Macaca mulatta, Macaca fascicularis) used by other laboratories in the course of their experiments, in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#28860) of the Stanford University. The protocol was approved by the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care of the Stanford University (Assurance Number: A3213-01).

Copyright

© 2020, Brackbill et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,803
    views
  • 465
    downloads
  • 41
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nora Brackbill
  2. Colleen Rhoades
  3. Alexandra Kling
  4. Nishal Pradeepbhai Shah
  5. Alexander Sher
  6. Alan M Litke
  7. E J Chichilnisky
(2020)
Reconstruction of natural images from responses of primate retinal ganglion cells
eLife 9:e58516.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58516

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58516

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Georgin Jacob, RT Pramod, SP Arun
    Research Article

    Most visual tasks involve looking for specific object features. But we also often perform property-based tasks where we look for specific property in an image, such as finding an odd item, deciding if two items are same, or if an object has symmetry. How do we solve such tasks? These tasks do not fit into standard models of decision making because their underlying feature space and decision process is unclear. Using well-known principles governing multiple object representations, we show that displays with repeating elements can be distinguished from heterogeneous displays using a property we define as visual homogeneity. In behavior, visual homogeneity predicted response times on visual search, same-different and symmetry tasks. Brain imaging during visual search and symmetry tasks revealed that visual homogeneity was localized to a region in the object-selective cortex. Thus, property-based visual tasks are solved in a localized region in the brain by computing visual homogeneity.

    1. Neuroscience
    François Kroll, Joshua Donnelly ... Jason Rihel
    Research Article

    By exposing genes associated with disease, genomic studies provide hundreds of starting points that should lead to druggable processes. However, our ability to systematically translate these genomic findings into biological pathways remains limited. Here, we combine rapid loss-of-function mutagenesis of Alzheimer’s risk genes and behavioural pharmacology in zebrafish to predict disrupted processes and candidate therapeutics. FramebyFrame, our expanded package for the analysis of larval behaviours, revealed that decreased night-time sleep was common to F0 knockouts of all four late-onset Alzheimer’s risk genes tested. We developed an online tool, ZOLTAR, which compares any behavioural fingerprint to a library of fingerprints from larvae treated with 3677 compounds. ZOLTAR successfully predicted that sorl1 mutants have disrupted serotonin signalling and identified betamethasone as a drug which normalises the excessive day-time sleep of presenilin-2 knockout larvae with minimal side effects. Predictive behavioural pharmacology offers a general framework to rapidly link disease-associated genes to druggable pathways.