A human ESC-based screen identifies a role for the translated lncRNA LINC00261 in pancreatic endocrine differentiation

  1. Bjoern Gaertner
  2. Sebastiaan van Heesch
  3. Valentin Schneider-Lunitz
  4. Jana Felicitas Schulz
  5. Franziska Witte
  6. Susanne Blachut
  7. Steven Nguyen
  8. Regina Wong
  9. Ileana Matta
  10. Norbert Hübner
  11. Maike Sander  Is a corresponding author
  1. Departments of Pediatrics and Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Pediatric Diabetes Research Center, University of California, San Diego, United States
  2. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Germany
  3. DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Germany
  4. Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Germany
  5. Charité -Universitätsmedizin, Germany
4 figures, 1 table and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
LncRNA expression and regulation during pancreatic differentiation.

(A) Stages of directed differentiation from human embryonic stem cell (hESCs) to hormone-producing endocrine cells. The color scheme for each stage is used across all figures. (B) K-means clustering of all lncRNAs expressed (RPKM ≥ 1) during pancreatic differentiation based on their expression z-score (mean of n = 2 independent differentiations per stage; from CyT49 hESCs). (C,D) Left: Scatterplots comparing the expression of early (C) and late (D) expressed endodermal transcription factors (TFs) with the expression of their neighboring lncRNAs across 38 tissues. The dot color indicates the germ layer of origin of these tissues. Pearson correlation coefficients and p-values (t-test) are displayed. Right: Distribution of the Pearson correlation coefficients for each TF with all Ensembl 87 genes across the same 38 tissues. Dashed lines denote the correlation for the neighboring lncRNA, which for all lncRNAs shown is higher than expected by chance. See also Figure 1—figure supplement 1 and Figure 1—source data 1.

Figure 1—source data 1

Identification, regulation, and characterization of lncRNAs during pancreatic differentiation.

(A) Gene expression during pancreatic differentiation (RPKM). (B) lncRNA-proximal TFs, by cluster in correlation heatmap (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). (C) GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis for each cluster in the correlation heatmap (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D).

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/58659/elife-58659-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Characterization of lncRNAs expressed during pancreatic differentiation.

(A,B) Left: Expression of the single nearest coding genes (±1000 kb) in cis to transcribed and non-transcribed lncRNAs at the DE stage (A) or PP2 stage (B). Log2 transformed mean expression values (RPKM + pseudocount) from two biological replicates were used to generate the box plots (****, p-value<0.0001, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Right: Corresponding cumulative distance distribution functions. (C) Heatmap of the hierarchically clustered expression correlations (Spearman’s rho) of all RNAs transcribed during pancreatic differentiation (with RPKM ≥ 1 in at least ten out of 38 tissues). Transcription factor (TF)-encoding mRNAs, lncRNAs (all), dynamically expressed lncRNAs (RPKM ≤ 1 in at least one stage (ESC to PP2)), and TF-proximal lncRNAs are highlighted above the heatmap. Clusters 8 and 10 are significantly enriched for all of these RNAs (*, p-value<0.03, Fisher test). (D) Gene ontology and KEGG pathway analysis for all coding genes in cluster 8 (p-value<0.05, Fisher test). The full list of significantly enriched terms is shown in Figure 1—source data 1C. (E–H) H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 ChIP-seq tracks of loci containing lncRNAs GATA6-AS1 (A), LINC00261 (B), PDX1-AS1/PLUTO (C), or SOX9-AS1 (D) during pancreatic differentiation of CyT49 hESCs.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Cytosolic lncRNAs contain translated small open reading frames.

(A) Overview of experimental strategy for subcellular fractionation and Ribo-seq-based identification of translated small open reading frames (sORFs) from lncRNAs expressed in PP2 cells. Replicates from six independent differentiations to PP2 stage each for total (polyA) RNA-seq and Ribo-seq experiments, and two biological replicates for the subcellular fractionation were analyzed. The histogram on the far right depicts the size distribution of the sORF-encoded small peptides as number of amino acids (aa). The pie chart summarizes the percentages of constitutively and dynamically expressed sORF-encoding lncRNAs during pancreatic differentiation of CyT49 hESCs. (B–E) Left: Bar graphs showing nuclear and cytosolic expression (in RPKM) of lncRNAs RP11-834C11.4 (B), LINC00261 (C), MIR7-3HG (D), and LHFPL3-AS2 (E). Data are shown as mean, with individual data points represented by dots (n = 2 biological replicates). Right: Subcellular fractionation RNA-seq, Ribo-seq, and P-site tracks (ribosomal P-sites inferred from ribosome footprints on ribosome-protected RNA) for loci of the depicted lncRNAs. Identified highest stringency sORFs (ORF in 6/6 replicates) are shown in red. For LINC00261, visually identified sORFs 1 and 2 are also shown. Heatmaps in the top right visualize the relative expression of the shown lncRNAs during pancreatic differentiation (means of two biological replicates per stage), on a minimum (white)/maximum (dark blue) scale. (F) In vivo translation reporter assays testing whether sORFs computationally defined in (A) give rise to translation products in HEK293T cells when fused in-frame to a GFP reporter. Left: Schematic of the constructs (gray: PGK promoter, black: lncRNA sequence 5’ to sORF to be tested, red: sORF, green: GFP ORF). Right: Representative DIC and GFP images of HEK293T cells transiently transfected with the indicated reporter constructs. Scale bars = 50 µm. See also Figure 2—figure supplement 1 and Figure 2—source data 1.

Figure 2—source data 1

RNA-seq after subcellular fractionation and Ribo-seq in PP2 cells.

(A) Subcellular fractionation of PP2 stage cells (RPKM). (B) Ribo-seq/mRNA-seq contaminant filtering statistics, read size distribution, and Pearson correlation coefficients of all sequenced Ribo-seq and polyA RNA-seq libraries. (C) All ORFs detected by RiboTaper, including lncRNA sORFs. (D) lncRNA sORFs detected by RiboTaper and conservation statistics (PhyloCSF scores). (E) Translational efficiency calculations.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/58659/elife-58659-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Cytosolic lncRNAs engage with ribosomes.

(A) Venn diagrams showing the number of coding RNAs (left) and lncRNAs (right) with RPKM ≥ 1 across two biological replicates in cytosolic and nuclear fractions. (B) Box plots of maximum lncRNA expression (RPKM + pseudocount) across 38 tissues binned by their degree of cytosolic localization (measured as nuclear/cytosolic lncRNA expression ratio deciles in PP2); the expression of all PP2-transcribed coding RNAs with dynamic expression during differentiation is included for reference. The pie chart summarizes the proportions of translated lncRNAs within each cytoplasmic localization decile. (C) Read length distribution (nt) of Ribo-seq fragments across replicate Ribo-seq experiments (n = 6 biological replicates). (D) Position of the inferred P-sites of the ribosome footprints relative to the reading frame of PP2-transcribed coding genes. (E–F) Coverage of 29 nt footprint P-sites around the start codons (E) or stop codons (F) of PP2-transcribed coding genes. (G) Box plots comparing maximum expression of translated and untranslated lncRNAs (RPKM + pseudocount) across 38 tissues (****, p-value=2.122×10−8, Wilcoxon rank sum test). For the untranslated set, 285 untranslated PP2-expressed lncRNAs were selected randomly. (H) Density plots comparing the translation efficiencies of PP2-expressed mRNAs and lncRNAs. (I) Autoradiograph of radiolabeled in vitro translation products derived from full-length LHFPL3-AS2, MIR7-3HG, LINC00261, and RP11-834C11.4. EV, empty vector. (J) Anti-FLAG immunofluorescence staining of HEK293T cells transiently transfected with a PGK-RP11-834C11.4-sORF-1xFLAG construct. (K) Microphotograph of HEK293T cells transiently transfected with a PGK-LINC00261-sORF4-GFP construct with mitochondria labeled by MitoSOX Red. (L) Golgi immunofluorescence staining (anti-GM130) of HEK293T cells transiently transfected with a PGK-LINC00261-sORF7-GFP construct. Scale bars = 10 µm.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement
A small-scale CRISPR loss-of-function screen for dynamically expressed and translated lncRNAs during pancreatic differentiation.

(A) qRT-PCR analysis of candidate lncRNAs during pancreatic differentiation of H1 hESCs relative to the ES stage. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (mean of n = 2–6 independent differentiations per stage; from H1 hESCs). Individual data points are represented by dots. See also Figure 3—source data 2. (B) CRISPR-based lncRNA knockout (KO) strategy in H1 hESCs and subsequent phenotypic characterization. (C) Immunofluorescence staining for OCT4 and SOX17 in DE from control (ctrl) and KO cells for the indicated lncRNAs (representative images, n ≥ 3 independent differentiations; at least two KO clones were analyzed). (D) qRT-PCR analysis of DE lineage markers in DE from control and lncRNA KO (-/-) cells. TF genes in cis to the lncRNA locus are highlighted in red. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3–16 replicates from independent differentiations and different KO clones). Individual data points are represented by dots. NS, p-value>0.05; t-test. See also Figure 3—source data 3. (E) Flow cytometry analysis at DE stage for SOX17 in control and KO (-/-) cells for indicated lncRNAs. The line demarks isotype control. Percentage of cells expressing SOX17 is indicated (representative experiment, n ≥ 3 independent differentiations from at least two KO clones). (F) Immunofluorescence staining for FOXA2 or GATA6 in DE from control and LINC00261, GATA6-AS1, and DIGIT KO cells. (G) Immunofluorescence staining for insulin (INS) in endocrine cell stage (EC) from control and KO hESCs for the indicated lncRNAs (representative images, n ≥ 3 independent differentiations from at least two KO clones). Boxed areas (dashed boxes) are shown in higher magnification. (H) qRT-PCR analysis of INS in EC stage cultures from control and lncRNA KO (-/-) hESCs. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n ≥ 4 replicates from independent differentiations of at least two KO clones). Individual data points are represented by dots. NS, p-value>0.05; t-test. See also Figure 3—source data 4 (I) Flow cytometry analysis at EC stage for INS in control and KO (-/-) cells for indicated lncRNAs. The line demarks isotype control. Percentage of cells expressing insulin is indicated (representative experiment, n ≥ 3 independent differentiations each from at least two KO clones). Scale bars = 100 µm. See also Figure 3—figure supplement 1 and Figure 3—source data 14.

Figure 3—source data 1

Differentially expressed genes after lncRNA deletion.

(A) Coordinates of CRISPR deletions. (B) Differentially expressed genes in RP11-445F12.1 knockout at definitive endoderm stage. (C) Differentially expressed genes in GATA6-AS1 knockout at definitive endoderm stage. (D) Differentially expressed genes in LINC00261 knockout at definitive endoderm stage. (E) Differentially expressed genes in LINC00617 knockout at PP2 stage. (F) Differentially expressed genes in GATA6-AS1 knockout at PP2 stage. (G) Differentially expressed genes in LINC00479 knockout at PP2 stage. (H) Differentially expressed genes in RP11-834C11.4 knockout at PP2 stage. (I) Differentially expressed genes in SOX9-AS1 knockout at PP2 stage. (J) Differentially expressed genes in MIR7-3HG knockout at PP2 stage. (K) Differentially expressed genes in LHFPL3-AS2 knockout at PP2 stage.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/58659/elife-58659-fig3-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 2

Source data used for the qRT-PCR quantification of gene expression presented in Figure 3A.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/58659/elife-58659-fig3-data2-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 3

Source data used for the qRT-PCR quantification of gene expression presented in Figure 3D.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/58659/elife-58659-fig3-data3-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 4

Source data used for the qRT-PCR quantification of INS expression presented in Figure 3H.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/58659/elife-58659-fig3-data4-v2.xlsx
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Minor gene expression changes in definitive endoderm or pancreatic progenitor cells after lncRNA deletion.

(A) Genome Browser snap shots of RNA-seq signal at the indicated lncRNA loci in control (ctrl) and lncRNA knockout (KO; -/-) DE (green tracks) and PP2 (red tracks) stage cells. Genomic deletions are indicated by gray boxes. (B) Bar graphs showing expression of indicated lncRNAs in control and lncRNA KO DE (green) and PP2 (red) cells quantified by RNA-seq. Data are shown as mean RPKM (n = 2–6 independent differentiations of two independent KO clones, except for SOX9-AS1 for which one clone was differentiated twice). Individual data points are represented by dots. (C) Volcano plots displaying gene expression changes in control versus lncRNA KO DE (green) or PP2 (red) cells. Differentially expressed genes (DESeq2; >2 fold change (FC), adjusted p-value<0.01; vertical and horizontal dashed lines indicate the thresholds; n = 2 independent differentiations of two independent KO clones, except for SOX9-AS1 for which one clone was differentiated twice) are shown in green (DE) and red (PP2). TF genes in cis to deleted lncRNAs are shown in gray (gray dots represent genes with ≤ 2 fold change and/or adjusted p-value≥0.01).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
LINC00261 deletion impedes pancreatic endocrine cell differentiation.

(A) Flow cytometry analysis at endocrine cell stage (EC) for insulin (INS) in control (ctrl) and LINC000261-/- H1 hESCs. Top panel: Schematic of the LINC00261 locus. The dashed box represents the genomic deletion. Middle panel: The line demarks isotype control. Percentage of cells expressing INS is indicated (representative experiment, n = 4 deletion clones generated with independent sgRNAs). Bottom panel: Bar graph showing percentages of INS-positive cells. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 5 (clone 1), n = 6 (clone 2), n = 8 (clone 3), n = 5 (clone 4) independent differentiations). Individual data points are represented by dots. (B) Immunofluorescence staining for INS in EC stage cultures from control and LINC000261-/- hESCs (representative images, number of differentiations see A). Boxed areas (dashed boxes) are shown in higher magnification. (C) ELISA for INS in EC stage cultures from control and LINC00261-/- hESCs. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 3 (clone 1), n = 2 (clone 2), n = 14 (clone 3), n = 13 (clone 4) independent differentiations). Individual data points are represented by dots. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of INS in EC stage cultures from control and LINC00261-/- hESCs. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 8 (clone 1), n = 4 (clone 2), n = 10 (clone 3), n = 3 (clone 4) independent differentiations). Individual data points are represented by dots. (E) Quantification of median fluorescence intensity after INS staining of control and LINC00261-/- EC stage cultures. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 5 (clone 1), n = 5 (clone 2), n = 4 (clone 3), n = 4 (clone 4) independent differentiations). iso, isotype control. Individual data points are represented by dots. (F) Volcano plot displaying gene expression changes in control versus LINC00261-/- PP2 cells (n = 6 independent differentiations from all four deletion clones). Differentially expressed genes are shown in red (DESeq2;>2 fold change (FC), adjusted p-value<0.01) and blue (>2 fold change, adjusted p-value≥0.01 and≤0.05). Thresholds are represented by vertical and horizontal dashed lines. FOXA2 in cis to LINC00261 is shown in gray (gray dots represent genes with ≤ 2 fold change and/or adjusted p-value>0.05). (G) Circos plot visualizing the chromosomal locations of the 108 genes differentially expressed (DESeq2;>2 fold change (FC), adjusted p-value<0.01) in LINC00261-/- compared to control PP2 cells, relative to LINC00261 on chromosome 20. No chromosome was over- or underrepresented (Fisher test, p-value>0.05 for all chromosomes). (H) Top panel: Schematic of the LINC00261 locus, with the location of its sORFs (1 to 7) marked by vertical red bars. Bottom panel: Flow cytometric quantification of INS-positive cells in control and LINC00261-sORF-frameshift (FS) at the EC stage. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 4–7 independent differentiations per clone). (I) ELISA for INS in EC stage cultures from control and LINC00261-sORF-FS hESCs. Data are shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 3–7 independent differentiations per clone). (J) Volcano plot displaying gene expression changes in control versus LINC00261-sORF3-FS PP2 cells. No gene was differentially expressed (DESeq2;>2 fold change, adjusted p-value<0.01; indicated by dashed horizontal and vertical lines; n = 2 independent differentiations). LINC00261 is shown in gray, the bar graph insert displays LINC00261 RPKM values in control and LINC00261-sORF3-FS PP2 cells. (K) LINC00261 half-life measurements in HEK293T cells transduced with lentivirus expressing either wild type (WT) LINC00261 or ΔATGsORF1-7 LINC00261 (mutant in which the ATG start codons of sORFs 1–7 were changed to non-start codons). HEK293T were treated with the transcription inhibitor actinomycin D and RNA isolated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9 hr post actinomycin D addition. LINC00261 expression was analyzed by qRT-PCR relative to the TBP gene. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3 biological replicates for each assay time point). *, p-value<0.05; **, p-value<0.01; ***, p-value<0.001; ****, p-value<0.0001; NS, p-value>0.05; t-test. Scale bars = 100 µm. See also Figure 4—figure supplement 1 and Figure 4—source data 13.

Figure 4—source data 1

Characterization of LINC00261 knockout and LINC00261-sORF3-frameshift PP2 cells.

(A) Differentially expressed genes in LINC00261 knockout PP2 stage cells. (B) Sequences of LINC00261 wild type and frameshift mutants. (C) Differentially expressed genes in LINC00261-sORF3-frameshift PP2 stage cells.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/58659/elife-58659-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 4—source data 2

List of oligonucleotides and synthetic gene fragments used in this study.

(A) sgRNA oligonucleotides used for cloning into PX458/Px459. (B) Genotyping and sequencing primers for KO validation. (C) qRT-PCR primers. (D) Cloning primers (translation reporter constructs and lentiviral LINC00261 overexpression plasmids). (E) Synthetic gene fragments. (F) Custom LINC00261 Stellaris RNA FISH probe set.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/58659/elife-58659-fig4-data2-v2.xlsx
Figure 4—source data 3

Source data used for the insulin measurements presented in Figure 4.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/58659/elife-58659-fig4-data3-v2.xlsx
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Characterization of LINC00261-deleted pancreatic progenitor cells.

(A) RNA-seq expression heatmap of LINC00261 across 35 cell types/tissues originating from all three germ layers (shown as RPKM + pseudocount). (B) Heatmap showing K-means clustering of 108 differentially expressed genes (DESeq2;>2 fold change (FC), adjusted p-value<0.01) between PP2 cells from control and LINC00261-/- H1 hESCs (based on expression z-score; n = 6 independent differentiations). (C) Top: Genome Browser snap shot of RNA-seq signal at the LINC00261/FOXA2 locus in control and LINC00261-/- PP2 stage cells. Genomic deletions are indicated by gray boxes. Bottom: Bar graphs showing LINC00261 and FOXA2 expression in control and LINC00261-/- PP2 cells quantified by RNA-seq. Data are shown as mean RPKM ± S.D. (n = 6 independent differentiations of four independent KO clones). ****, p-value<0.0001; NS, p-value>0.05; t-test. (D) LINC00261 smRNA FISH in control and LINC00261-/- PP2 cells. Scale bars = 8 µm. Boxed areas (dashed boxes) are shown in higher magnification. (E) qRT-PCR analysis of LINC00261 (top) and INS (bottom) expression in control and LINC00261-sORF-FS H1 hESC clones at the endocrine cell (EC) stage. Data are shown as mean ± S.E.M. (n ≥ 3 independent differentiations for each clone). Individual data points are represented by dots.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type
(species)
or resource
DesignationSource or
reference
IdentifiersAdditional
information
Gene (Homo sapiens) LINC00617; TUNAREnsembl 87ENSG00000250366
Gene (Homo sapiens) RP11-445F12.1; LHX-DTEnsembl 87ENSG00000250366
Gene (Homo sapiens) DIGIT; GSC-DTHGNC and NCBI RefSeq
 
HGNC:53074; NCBI RefSeq 108868751
Gene (Homo sapiens) GATA6-AS1; GATA6-ASEnsembl 87ENSG00000277268
Gene (Homo sapiens) LINC00479Ensembl 87ENSG00000236384
Gene (Homo sapiens) LINC00261; DEANR1; ALIEN; onco-lncRNA-17; lnc-FOXA2-2Ensembl 87ENSG00000236384
Gene (Homo sapiens) RP11-834C11.4Ensembl 87ENSG00000250742
Gene (Homo sapiens) SOX9-AS1Ensembl 87ENSG00000234899
Gene (Homo sapiens) MIR7-3HGEnsembl 87ENSG00000176840
Gene (Homo sapiens) LHFPL3-AS2Ensembl 87ENSG00000225329
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)Stbl3ThermoFisher ScientificCat# C737303Chemically competent cells
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)DH5αNew England BiolabsCat# C2987IChemically competent cells
Cell line (Homo sapiens)H1 (embryonic stem cells)WiCell Research InstituteNIHhESC-10–0043, RRID:CVCL_9771
Cell line (Homo sapiens)HEK293T (embryonic kidney)ATCCCat# CRL-3216, RRID:CVCL_0063
Antibodyanti-human OCT-4A (Rabbit monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 2890,
RRID:AB_2167725
IF (1:1000)
Antibodyanti-human SOX17 (Goat polyclonal)R and D SystemsCat# AF1924,
RRID:AB_355060
IF (1:250)
Antibodyanti-human FOXA2 (Goat polyclonal)Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat# sc-6554, RRID:AB_2262810IF (1:250)
Antibodyanti-human GATA6 (Goat polyclonal)Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat# sc-9055, RRID:AB_2108768IF (1:50)
Antibodyanti-human
Insulin (Guinea pig polyclonal)
DakoCat# A0564, RRID:AB_10013624IF (1:1000)
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 488 AffiniPure anti-Goat IgG (Donkey polyclonal)Jackson ImmunoResearch LabsCat# 706-545-148, RRID:AB_2340472IF (1:1000)
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 488 AffiniPure anti-Rabbit IgG (Donkey polyclonal)Jackson ImmunoResearch LabsCat# 711-545-152, RRID:AB_2313584IF (1:1000)
AntibodyCy3 AffiniPure anti-Goat IgG (Donkey polyclonal)Jackson ImmunoResearch LabsCat# 705-165-147, RRID:AB_2307351IF (1:1000)
Antibodyanti-human Insulin-PE (Rabbit monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 8508S, RRID:AB_11179076Flow cytometry (1:50)
Antibodyanti-human SOX17-PE (Mouse monoclonal)BD BiosciencesCat# 561591, RRID:AB_10717121Flow cytometry (5 ul per test)
AntibodyIgG-PE (Rabbit monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 5742S, RRID:AB_10694219Flow cytometry isotype control antibody (1:50)
AntibodyIgG1, κ antibody (Mouse monoclonal)BD BiosciencesCat# 556650, RRID:AB_396514Flow cytometry isotype control antibody (1:50)
Recombinant DNA reagentpSpCas9(BB)−2A-Puro (Px459; V2.0)Feng ZhangRRID:Addgene_62988Cas9 from S. pyogenes with 2A-Puro, and cloning backbone for sgRNA
Recombinant DNA reagentpSpCas9(BB)−2A-GFP (PX458)Feng ZhangRRID:Addgene_48138Cas9 from S. pyogenes with 2A-EGFP, and cloning backbone for sgRNA
Recombinant DNA reagentpCMVR8.74Didier TronoRRID:Addgene_220362nd generation lentiviral packaging plasmid
Recombinant DNA reagentpMD2.GDidier TronoRRID:Addgene_12259VSV-G envelope expressing plasmid
Recombinant DNA reagentpENTR/D-TOPO-LINC00261Kurian et al., 2015 (PMID:25739401)Leo Kurian (University of Cologne)
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-GFP.WPREDidier TronoRRID:Addgene_122523rd generation lentiviral backbone
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-LINC00261.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of wild type LINC00261
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-ΔATGsORF1-7 LINC00261.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of ΔATGsORF1-7 LINC00261
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-LINC00261-sORF1-GFP.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of LINC00261-sORF1-GFP fusion protein
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-LINC00261-sORF2-GFP.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of LINC00261-sORF2-GFP fusion protein
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-LINC00261-sORF3-GFP.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of LINC00261-sORF3-GFP fusion protein
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-LINC00261-sORF4-GFP.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of LINC00261-sORF4-GFP fusion protein
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-LINC00261-sORF5-GFP.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of LINC00261-sORF5-GFP fusion protein
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-LINC00261-sORF6-GFP.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of LINC00261-sORF6-GFP fusion protein
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-LINC00261-sORF7-GFP.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of LINC00261-sORF7-GFP fusion protein
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-LINC00261-sORF3-FS-GFP.WPREThis paperLINC00261-sORF3-frameshift-GFP control plasmid
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-LINC00261-sORF2-STOP-GFP.WPREThis paperLINC00261-sORF2-STOP-GFP control plasmid
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-RP11-834C11.4-sORF-GFP.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of RP11-834C11.4-sORF-GFP fusion protein
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-RP11-834C11.4-sORF-FLAG.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of RP11-834C11.4-sORF-FLAG fusion protein
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-MIR7-3HG-sORF-GFP.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of MIR7-3HG-sORF-GFP fusion protein
Recombinant DNA reagentpRRLSIN.cPPT.PGK-RP11-LHFPL3-AS2-sORF-GFP.WPREThis paperTransient (transfection) or stable (lentiviral integration) expression of LHFPL3-AS2-sORF-GFP fusion protein
Peptide, recombinant proteinActivin AR and D SystemsCat# 338-AC/CF
Peptide, recombinant proteinWnt3aR and D SystemsCat# 1324-WN-010
Peptide, recombinant proteinKGF/FGF7R and D SystemsCat# 251 KG
Peptide, recombinant proteinNogginR and D SystemsCat# 3344 NG-050
Commercial assay or kitRNeasy
Mini Kit
QIAGENCat# 15596018
Commercial assay or kitRNA Clean and Concentrator−25Zymo ResearchCat# R1018
Commercial assay or kitParis KitThermo Fisher
Scientific
Cat# AM1921
Commercial assay or kitRNase-Free DNase Set (50)QIAGENCat# 79254
Commercial assay or kitTURBO DNA-free KitThermo Fisher ScientificCat# AM1907
Commercial assay or kitTruSeq Ribo Profile (Mammalian) Library Prep KitIlluminaCat# RPYSC12116
Commercial assay or kitTruSeq Stranded mRNA Library PrepIlluminaCat# 20020594
Commercial assay or kitTruSeq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep GoldIlluminaCat# 20020599
Commercial assay or kitKAPA mRNA HyperPrep KitRocheCat# KK8581
Commercial assay or kitHigh Sensitivity D1000 ScreenTapeAgilent TechnologiesCat# 5067–5584
Commercial assay or kitRNA ScreenTapeAgilent TechnologiesCat# 5067–5576
Commercial assay or kitRNA ScreenTape Sample BufferAgilent TechnologiesCat# 5067–5577
Commercial assay or kitRNA ScreenTape LadderAgilent TechnologiesCat# 5067–5578
Commercial assay or kitQubit ssDNA assay kitThermo Fisher ScientificCat# Q10212
Commercial assay or kitKOD Xtreme DNA Hotstart PolymeraseMilliporeCat# 71975
Commercial assay or kitGoTaq Green Master MixPromegaCat# M7123
Commercial assay or kitTOPO TA Cloning KitThermo Fisher ScientificCat# K452001
Commercial assay or kitMonarch Plasmid Miniprep KitNEBCat# T1010L
Commercial assay or kitMinElute PCR Purification KitQIAGENCat# 28006
Commercial assay or kitiScript cDNA Synthesis KitBio-RadCat# 1708890
Commercial assay or kitiQ SYBR Green SupermixBio-RadCat# 1708880
Commercial assay or kitHuman Stem Cell
Nucleofector Kit 2
LonzaCat# VPH-5022
Commercial assay or kitXtremeGene 9 DNA Transfection ReagentSigma-AldrichCat# 06365779001
Commercial assay or kitCytofix/Cytoperm W/Golgi Stop KitBD BiosciencesCat# 554715
Commercial assay or kitInsulin ELISA JumboAlpcoCat# 80-INSHU-E10.1
Commercial assay or kitPierce BCA Protein Assay KitThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 23227
Commercial assay or kitTnT Coupled Wheat Germ Extract SystemPromegaCat# L4130
Chemical compound, drugPenicillin-StreptomycinThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 15140122
Chemical compound, drugPuromycin dihydrochlorideSigma-AldrichCat# P8833
Chemical compound, drugALK5 Inhibitor IIEnzo Life SciencesCat# ALX-270–445
Chemical compound, drugRetinoic AcidSigma-AldrichCat# R2625
Chemical compound, drugAscorbic AcidSigma-AldrichCat# A4403-100MG
Chemical compound, drugLDN-193189StemgentCat# 04–0074
Chemical compound, drugSANT-1Sigma-AldrichCat# S4572
Chemical compound, drugTPBCalbiochemCat# 565740
Chemical compound, drugTGFβ R1 kinase inhibitor IVEMD BiosciencesCat# 616454
Chemical compound, drugKAAD-CyclopamineToronto Research ChemicalsCat# K171000
Chemical compound, drugTTNPBSigma-AldrichCat# T3757
Chemical compound, drugCycloheximideSigma-AldrichCat# C7698
Chemical compound, drugActinomycin DSigma-AldrichCat# A9415
Chemical compound,
drug
Polyethylenimine (PEI)PolysciencesCat# 23966–1
Chemical compound, drugHoechst 33342, Trihydrochloride, TrihydrateThermo Fisher ScientificCat# H3570
Chemical
compound, drug
MitoSOX RedThermo Fisher ScientificCat# M36008
Chemical compound, drugD-(+)-Glucose Solution, 45%Sigma-AldrichCat# G8769
Chemical compound, drugSodium BicarbonateSigma-AldrichCat# NC0564699
Chemical compound, drugROCK Inhibitor Y-27632STEMCELL TechnologiesCat# 72305
Software, algorithmFlowjo-v10FlowJo, LLCRRID:SCR_008520http://www.flowjo.com/download-newest-version/
Software, algorithmSTAR 2.5.3aDobin et al., 2013RRID:SCR_015899https://github.com/alexdobin/STAR
Software, algorithmBowtie 1.1.1Langmead et al., 2009RRID:SCR_005476http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/index.shtml
Software, algorithmCufflinks 2.2.1Trapnell et al., 2010RRID:SCR_014597https://github.com/cole-trapnell-lab/cufflinks
Software, algorithmHTSeq 0.6.1Anders et al., 2015RRID:SCR_005514https://htseq.readthedocs.io/en/master/install.html
Software, algorithmDEseq2 1.10.1Love et al., 2014RRID:SCR_015687https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/DESeq2.html
Software, algorithmRiboTaperCalviello et al., 2016RRID:SCR_018880https://ohlerlab.mdc-berlin.de/software/RiboTaper_126/
Software, algorithmR 3.5.0RRID:SCR_001905https://cran.r-project.org/
Software, algorithmSAMtools 1.3Li et al., 2009RRID:SCR_002105https://github.com/samtools/samtools
Software, algorithmBEDTools 2.17.0Quinlan and Hall, 2010RRID:SCR_006646https://bedtools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/content/installation.html
Software, algorithmHOMER 4.10Heinz et al., 2010RRID:SCR_010881http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/download.html
Software, algorithmGREAT 3.0.0McLean et al., 2010RRID:SCR_005807http://great.stanford.edu/public/html/
Software, algorithmAdobe Illustrator CS5AdobeRRID:SCR_010279
Software, algorithmAdobe Photoshop CS5AdobeRRID:SCR_014199
Software, algorithmGraphPad Prism v7.05GraphPad Software, LLCRRID:SCR_002798
OtherNovex 16% Tricine Protein GelThermo Fisher ScientificCat# EC66955BOX
OtherNovex Tricine SDS Sample Buffer (2X)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat# LC1676
OtherImmobilon-PSQ PVDF MembraneMerck MilliporeCat# ISEQ00010
OtherStellaris RNA FISH Hybridisation BufferLGC Biosearch TechnologiesCat# SMF-HB1-10
OtherStellaris RNA FISH Wash Buffer ALGC Biosearch TechnologiesCat# SMF-WA1-60
OtherStellaris RNA FISH Wash Buffer BLGC Biosearch TechnologiesCat# SMF-WB1-20
OtherQuickExtract DNA Extraction SolutionLucigenCat# QE09050
OtherVectashield Antifade Mounting MediumVector LaboratoriesCat# H-1000
OtherFastDigest BpiIThermo Fisher ScientificCat# FD1014
OtherFastDigest BshTIThermo Fisher ScientificCat# FERFD1464
OtherFastDigest SalIThermo Fisher ScientificCat# FD0644
OtherTRIzolThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 15596018
OtherMatrigelCorningCat# 356231
OtherGlutaMAXThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 35050061
OtherDPBS (without calcium and magnesium)CorningCat# 45000–434
OthermTeSR1 Complete Kit - GMPSTEMCELL TechnologiesCat# 85850
OtherRPMI 1640 Medium, HEPESThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 22400–089
OtherDMEM/F12 with L-Glutamine, HEPESCorningCat# 45000–350
OtherDulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s MediumCorningCat# 45000–312
OtherHyClone Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles MediumThermo Fisher ScientificCat# SH30081.FS
OtherMCDB 131Thermo Fisher ScientificCat# 10372–019
OtherOpti-MEM Reduced Serum MediumThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 31985062
OtherInsulin-Transferrin-Selenium-Ethanolamine (ITS-X) (100X)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat# 51500–056
OtherB-27 Supplement (50X)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat# 17504044
OtherBovine Albumin Fraction V (7.5%)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat# 15260037
OtherFetal Bovine SerumCorningCat# 35011CV
OtherDonkey SerumGemini Bio-ProductsCat# 100-151/500
OtherFatty Acid-Free BSAProliant BiologicalsCat# 68700
OtherAccutaseeBioscienceCat# 00-4555-56

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bjoern Gaertner
  2. Sebastiaan van Heesch
  3. Valentin Schneider-Lunitz
  4. Jana Felicitas Schulz
  5. Franziska Witte
  6. Susanne Blachut
  7. Steven Nguyen
  8. Regina Wong
  9. Ileana Matta
  10. Norbert Hübner
  11. Maike Sander
(2020)
A human ESC-based screen identifies a role for the translated lncRNA LINC00261 in pancreatic endocrine differentiation
eLife 9:e58659.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58659