Abstract

Low-dimensional linear dynamics are observed in neuronal population activity in primary motor cortex (M1) when monkeys make reaching movements. This population-level behavior is consistent with a role for M1 as an autonomous pattern generator that drives muscles to give rise to movement. In the present study, we examine whether similar dynamics are also observed during grasping movements, which involve fundamentally different patterns of kinematics and muscle activations. Using a variety of analytical approaches, we show that M1 does not exhibit such dynamics during grasping movements. Rather, the grasp-related neuronal dynamics in M1 are similar to their counterparts in somatosensory cortex, whose activity is driven primarily by afferent inputs rather than by intrinsic dynamics. The basic structure of the neuronal activity underlying hand control is thus fundamentally different from that underlying arm control.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in Dryad, accessible at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xsj3tx9cm

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Aneesha K Suresh

    Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. James M Goodman

    Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Elizaveta V Okorokova

    Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2719-2706
  4. Matthew Kaufman

    Department of Oganismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Nicholas G Hatsopoulos

    Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sliman J Bensmaia

    Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    For correspondence
    sliman@uchicago.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4039-9135

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS082865)

  • Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
  • Sliman J Bensmaia

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS096952)

  • Aneesha K Suresh

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS045853)

  • Nicholas G Hatsopoulos

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS111982)

  • Nicholas G Hatsopoulos

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS101325)

  • Sliman J Bensmaia

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All surgical, behavioral, and experimental procedures conformed to the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and were approved by the University of Chicago Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (#72042).

Copyright

© 2020, Suresh et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,192
    views
  • 765
    downloads
  • 52
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Aneesha K Suresh
  2. James M Goodman
  3. Elizaveta V Okorokova
  4. Matthew Kaufman
  5. Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
  6. Sliman J Bensmaia
(2020)
Neural population dynamics in motor cortex are different for reach and grasp
eLife 9:e58848.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58848

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58848

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Yisi Liu, Pu Wang ... Hongwei Zhou
    Short Report

    The increasing use of tissue clearing techniques underscores the urgent need for cost-effective and simplified deep imaging methods. While traditional inverted confocal microscopes excel in high-resolution imaging of tissue sections and cultured cells, they face limitations in deep imaging of cleared tissues due to refractive index mismatches between the immersion media of objectives and sample container. To overcome these challenges, the RIM-Deep was developed to significantly improve deep imaging capabilities without compromising the normal function of the confocal microscope. This system facilitates deep immunofluorescence imaging of the prefrontal cortex in cleared macaque tissue, extending imaging depth from 2 mm to 5 mm. Applied to an intact and cleared Thy1-EGFP mouse brain, the system allowed for clear axonal visualization at high imaging depth. Moreover, this advancement enables large-scale, deep 3D imaging of intact tissues. In principle, this concept can be extended to any imaging modality, including existing inverted wide-field, confocal, and two-photon microscopy. This would significantly upgrade traditional laboratory configurations and facilitate the study of connectomes in the brain and other tissues.

    1. Neuroscience
    Damian Koevoet, Laura Van Zantwijk ... Christoph Strauch
    Research Article

    What determines where to move the eyes? We recently showed that pupil size, a well-established marker of effort, also reflects the effort associated with making a saccade (‘saccade costs’). Here, we demonstrate saccade costs to critically drive saccade selection: when choosing between any two saccade directions, the least costly direction was consistently preferred. Strikingly, this principle even held during search in natural scenes in two additional experiments. When increasing cognitive demand experimentally through an auditory counting task, participants made fewer saccades and especially cut costly directions. This suggests that the eye-movement system and other cognitive operations consume similar resources that are flexibly allocated among each other as cognitive demand changes. Together, we argue that eye-movement behavior is tuned to adaptively minimize saccade-inherent effort.