Extended field-of-view ultrathin microendoscopes for high-resolution two-photon imaging with minimal invasiveness

Abstract

Imaging neuronal activity with high and homogeneous spatial resolution across the field-of-view (FOV) and limited invasiveness in deep brain regions is fundamental for the progress of neuroscience, yet is a major technical challenge. We achieved this goal by correcting optical aberrations in gradient index lens-based ultrathin (< 500 μm) microendoscopes using aspheric microlenses generated through 3D-microprinting. Corrected microendoscopes had extended FOV (eFOV) with homogeneous spatial resolution for two-photon fluorescence imaging and required no modification of the optical set-up. Synthetic calcium imaging data showed that, compared to uncorrected endoscopes, eFOV-microendoscopes led to improved signal-to-noise ratio and more precise evaluation of correlated neuronal activity. We experimentally validated these predictions in awake head-fixed mice. Moreover, using eFOV-microendoscopes we demonstrated cell-specific encoding of behavioral state-dependent information in distributed functional subnetworks in a primary somatosensory thalamic nucleus. eFOV-microendoscopes are, therefore, small-crosssection ready-to-use tools for deep two-photon functional imaging with unprecedentedly high and homogeneous spatial resolution.

Data availability

The datasets shown in Figures 4, 6, 7 and corresponding figure supplements are available at:https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/wm6c5wzs4c/draft?a=56f1660e-a036-40ee-83ef-458dc2457b6aThe software used in this paper to generate and analyze artificial t-series is available at: https://github.com/moni90/eFOV_microendoscopes_simNumerical data for graphs represented in figures 3-7, figure 2-figure supplement 2-4, figure 3-figure supplement 4, figure 4-figure supplement 1-2 are provided as source data.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tommaso Fellin

    Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy
    For correspondence
    tommaso.fellin@iit.it
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2718-7533
  2. Andrea Antonini

    Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Andrea Sattin

    Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Monica Moroni

    CNCS, Italian Institute of Technology, ROVERETO, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1852-7217
  5. Serena Bovetti

    CNCS, Italian Institute of Technology, ROVERETO, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Claudio Moretti

    Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Francesca Succol

    Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Angelo Forli

    Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dania Vecchia

    Department of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Vijayakumar p Rajamanickam

    BESE, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Andrea Bertoncini

    BESE, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Stefano Panzeri

    Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems, Istituto Italiano di tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1700-8909
  13. Carlo Liberale

    BESE, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5653-199X

Funding

European Research Council (NEURO-PATTERNS)

  • Tommaso Fellin

IIT interdisciplinary grant

  • Tommaso Fellin

IIT interdisciplinary grant

  • Carlo Liberale

KAUST (BAS/1/1064-01-01)

  • Carlo Liberale

NIH Brain Initiative (NS090576)

  • Tommaso Fellin

NIH Brain Initiative (NS107464)

  • Tommaso Fellin

NIH Brain Initiative (NS107464)

  • Stefano Panzeri

NIH Brain Initiative (NS109961)

  • Stefano Panzeri

FP7 (DESIRE)

  • Tommaso Fellin

FIRB (RBAP11X42L)

  • Tommaso Fellin

Flag-Era JTC Human Brain Project (SLOW-DYN)

  • Tommaso Fellin

Flag-Era JTC Human Brain Project (SLOW-DYN)

  • Stefano Panzeri

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Experimental procedures involving animals have been approved by the Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Animal Health Regulatory Committee, by the National Council on Animal Care of the Italian Ministry of Health (authorization # 1134/2015-PR, # 689/2018-PR) and carried out according to the National legislation (D.Lgs. 26/2014) and to the legislation of the European Communities Council Directive (European Directive 2010/63/EU).

Copyright

© 2020, Fellin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,802
    views
  • 594
    downloads
  • 39
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tommaso Fellin
  2. Andrea Antonini
  3. Andrea Sattin
  4. Monica Moroni
  5. Serena Bovetti
  6. Claudio Moretti
  7. Francesca Succol
  8. Angelo Forli
  9. Dania Vecchia
  10. Vijayakumar p Rajamanickam
  11. Andrea Bertoncini
  12. Stefano Panzeri
  13. Carlo Liberale
(2020)
Extended field-of-view ultrathin microendoscopes for high-resolution two-photon imaging with minimal invasiveness
eLife 9:e58882.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58882

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58882

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Christine Ahrends, Mark W Woolrich, Diego Vidaurre
    Tools and Resources

    Predicting an individual’s cognitive traits or clinical condition using brain signals is a central goal in modern neuroscience. This is commonly done using either structural aspects, such as structural connectivity or cortical thickness, or aggregated measures of brain activity that average over time. But these approaches are missing a central aspect of brain function: the unique ways in which an individual’s brain activity unfolds over time. One reason why these dynamic patterns are not usually considered is that they have to be described by complex, high-dimensional models; and it is unclear how best to use these models for prediction. We here propose an approach that describes dynamic functional connectivity and amplitude patterns using a Hidden Markov model (HMM) and combines it with the Fisher kernel, which can be used to predict individual traits. The Fisher kernel is constructed from the HMM in a mathematically principled manner, thereby preserving the structure of the underlying model. We show here, in fMRI data, that the HMM-Fisher kernel approach is accurate and reliable. We compare the Fisher kernel to other prediction methods, both time-varying and time-averaged functional connectivity-based models. Our approach leverages information about an individual’s time-varying amplitude and functional connectivity for prediction and has broad applications in cognitive neuroscience and personalised medicine.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jessica Royer, Valeria Kebets ... Boris C Bernhardt
    Research Article Updated

    Complex structural and functional changes occurring in typical and atypical development necessitate multidimensional approaches to better understand the risk of developing psychopathology. Here, we simultaneously examined structural and functional brain network patterns in relation to dimensions of psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) dataset. Several components were identified, recapitulating the psychopathology hierarchy, with the general psychopathology (p) factor explaining most covariance with multimodal imaging features, while the internalizing, externalizing, and neurodevelopmental dimensions were each associated with distinct morphological and functional connectivity signatures. Connectivity signatures associated with the p factor and neurodevelopmental dimensions followed the sensory-to-transmodal axis of cortical organization, which is related to the emergence of complex cognition and risk for psychopathology. Results were consistent in two separate data subsamples and robust to variations in analytical parameters. Although model parameters yielded statistically significant brain–behavior associations in unseen data, generalizability of the model was rather limited for all three latent components (r change from within- to out-of-sample statistics: LC1within = 0.36, LC1out = 0.03; LC2within = 0.34, LC2out = 0.05; LC3within = 0.35, LC3out = 0.07). Our findings help in better understanding biological mechanisms underpinning dimensions of psychopathology, and could provide brain-based vulnerability markers.