GAS5 protects against osteoporosis by targeting UPF1/SMAD7 axis in osteoblast differentiation

  1. Ming Li
  2. Zhongyu Xie
  3. Jinteng Li
  4. Jiajie Lin
  5. Guan Zheng
  6. Wenjie Liu
  7. Su'an Tang
  8. Shuizhong Cen
  9. Guiwen Ye
  10. Zhaofeng Li
  11. Wenhui Yu
  12. Peng Wang  Is a corresponding author
  13. Yanfeng Wu  Is a corresponding author
  14. Huiyong Shen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, China
  2. The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, China
  3. Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a common systemic skeletal disorder resulting in bone fragility and increased fracture risk. It is still necessary to explore its detailed mechanisms and identify novel targets for the treatment of osteoporosis. Previously, we found that a lncRNA named GAS5 in human could negatively regulate the lipoblast/adipocyte differentiation. However, it is still unclear whether GAS5 affects osteoblast differentiation and whether GAS5 is associated with osteoporosis. Our current research found that GAS5 was decreased in the bones and BMSCs, a major origin of osteoblast, of osteoporosis patients. Mechanistically, GAS5 promotes the osteoblast differentiation by interacting with UPF1 to degrade SMAD7 mRNA. Moreover, a decreased bone mass and impaired bone repair ability were observed in Gas5 heterozygous mice, manifesting in osteoporosis. The systemic supplement of Gas5-overexpressing adenoviruses significantly ameliorated bone loss in an osteoporosis mouse model. In conclusion, GAS5 promotes osteoblast differentiation by targeting the UPF1/SMAD7 axis and protects against osteoporosis.

Data availability

The relevant data are available from Dryad (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.9cnp5hqfj). Primers of the analyzed genes (Supplementary Table 1), the siRNA sequences of the analyzed genes (Supplementary Table 2), characteristics of the study subjects (Supplementary Table 3) and Characteristics of the 15 healthy donors (Supplementary Table 4) can be found in the supplementary documents.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ming Li

    Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Zhongyu Xie

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jinteng Li

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jiajie Lin

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Guan Zheng

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Wenjie Liu

    Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Su'an Tang

    Department of Orthopedics, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shuizhong Cen

    Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Guiwen Ye

    Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zhaofeng Li

    Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Wenhui Yu

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Peng Wang

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    wangpengsmh@foxmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Yanfeng Wu

    Center for Biotherapy, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    For correspondence
    wuyf@mail.sysu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Huiyong Shen

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    shenhuiy@mail.sysu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7104-3049

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971518,81672097,81871750,81702120)

  • Zhongyu Xie
  • Peng Wang
  • Yanfeng Wu
  • Huiyong Shen

Ken Realm R&D Program of Guangdong Province (2019B020236001)

  • Huiyong Shen

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (19ykpy01)

  • Zhongyu Xie

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. All procedures involving animals were approved by the Animal Use and Care Committee of the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (approval number: SYSU-IACUC-2018-B10325).

Human subjects: The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (approval number: 2018r010) and it was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations of ethics committee. After explaining in detail the possible risks and importance of the research, as well as informing methods of privacy protection, we obtained the informed consent and consent publish signatures of all patients or normal donors.

Copyright

© 2020, Li et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,312
    views
  • 243
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59079

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Beibei Liu ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article Updated

    Distal appendages are ninefold symmetric blade-like structures attached to the distal end of the mother centriole. These structures are critical for the formation of the primary cilium, by regulating at least four critical steps: preciliary vesicle recruitment, recruitment and initiation of intraflagellar transport (IFT), and removal of CP110. While specific proteins that localize to the distal appendages have been identified, how exactly each protein functions to achieve the multiple roles of the distal appendages is poorly understood. Here, we comprehensively analyze known and newly discovered distal appendage proteins (CEP83, SCLT1, CEP164, TTBK2, FBF1, CEP89, KIZ, ANKRD26, PIDD1, LRRC45, NCS1, CEP15) for their precise localization, order of recruitment, and their roles in each step of cilia formation. Using CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts, we show that the order of the recruitment of the distal appendage proteins is highly interconnected and a more complex hierarchy. Our analysis highlights two protein modules, CEP83-SCLT1 and CEP164-TTBK2, as critical for structural assembly of distal appendages. Functional assays revealed that CEP89 selectively functions in the RAB34+ vesicle recruitment, while deletion of the integral components, CEP83-SCLT1-CEP164-TTBK2, severely compromised all four steps of cilium formation. Collectively, our analyses provide a more comprehensive view of the organization and the function of the distal appendage, paving the way for molecular understanding of ciliary assembly.