GAS5 protects against osteoporosis by targeting UPF1/SMAD7 axis in osteoblast differentiation

  1. Ming Li
  2. Zhongyu Xie
  3. Jinteng Li
  4. Jiajie Lin
  5. Guan Zheng
  6. Wenjie Liu
  7. Su'an Tang
  8. Shuizhong Cen
  9. Guiwen Ye
  10. Zhaofeng Li
  11. Wenhui Yu
  12. Peng Wang  Is a corresponding author
  13. Yanfeng Wu  Is a corresponding author
  14. Huiyong Shen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, China
  2. The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, China
  3. Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, China

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a common systemic skeletal disorder resulting in bone fragility and increased fracture risk. It is still necessary to explore its detailed mechanisms and identify novel targets for the treatment of osteoporosis. Previously, we found that a lncRNA named GAS5 in human could negatively regulate the lipoblast/adipocyte differentiation. However, it is still unclear whether GAS5 affects osteoblast differentiation and whether GAS5 is associated with osteoporosis. Our current research found that GAS5 was decreased in the bones and BMSCs, a major origin of osteoblast, of osteoporosis patients. Mechanistically, GAS5 promotes the osteoblast differentiation by interacting with UPF1 to degrade SMAD7 mRNA. Moreover, a decreased bone mass and impaired bone repair ability were observed in Gas5 heterozygous mice, manifesting in osteoporosis. The systemic supplement of Gas5-overexpressing adenoviruses significantly ameliorated bone loss in an osteoporosis mouse model. In conclusion, GAS5 promotes osteoblast differentiation by targeting the UPF1/SMAD7 axis and protects against osteoporosis.

Data availability

The relevant data are available from Dryad (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.9cnp5hqfj). Primers of the analyzed genes (Supplementary Table 1), the siRNA sequences of the analyzed genes (Supplementary Table 2), characteristics of the study subjects (Supplementary Table 3) and Characteristics of the 15 healthy donors (Supplementary Table 4) can be found in the supplementary documents.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ming Li

    Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Zhongyu Xie

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Jinteng Li

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jiajie Lin

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Guan Zheng

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Wenjie Liu

    Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Su'an Tang

    Department of Orthopedics, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shuizhong Cen

    Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Guiwen Ye

    Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zhaofeng Li

    Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Wenhui Yu

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Peng Wang

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    wangpengsmh@foxmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Yanfeng Wu

    Center for Biotherapy, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    For correspondence
    wuyf@mail.sysu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Huiyong Shen

    Department of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    shenhuiy@mail.sysu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7104-3049

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971518,81672097,81871750,81702120)

  • Zhongyu Xie
  • Peng Wang
  • Yanfeng Wu
  • Huiyong Shen

Ken Realm R&D Program of Guangdong Province (2019B020236001)

  • Huiyong Shen

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (19ykpy01)

  • Zhongyu Xie

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. All procedures involving animals were approved by the Animal Use and Care Committee of the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (approval number: SYSU-IACUC-2018-B10325).

Human subjects: The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (approval number: 2018r010) and it was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations of ethics committee. After explaining in detail the possible risks and importance of the research, as well as informing methods of privacy protection, we obtained the informed consent and consent publish signatures of all patients or normal donors.

Copyright

© 2020, Li et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,299
    views
  • 242
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ming Li
  2. Zhongyu Xie
  3. Jinteng Li
  4. Jiajie Lin
  5. Guan Zheng
  6. Wenjie Liu
  7. Su'an Tang
  8. Shuizhong Cen
  9. Guiwen Ye
  10. Zhaofeng Li
  11. Wenhui Yu
  12. Peng Wang
  13. Yanfeng Wu
  14. Huiyong Shen
(2020)
GAS5 protects against osteoporosis by targeting UPF1/SMAD7 axis in osteoblast differentiation
eLife 9:e59079.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59079

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59079

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Chengfang Pan, Ying Liu ... Changlong Hu
    Research Article

    Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is an endogenous inhibitor of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and plays an important role in pancreatic β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanism by which PGE2 inhibits GSIS. Our results showed that PGE2 inhibited Kv2.2 channels via increasing PKA activity in HEK293T cells overexpressed with Kv2.2 channels. Point mutation analysis demonstrated that S448 residue was responsible for the PKA-dependent modulation of Kv2.2. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of PGE2 on Kv2.2 was blocked by EP2/4 receptor antagonists, while mimicked by EP2/4 receptor agonists. The immune fluorescence results showed that EP1–4 receptors are expressed in both mouse and human β-cells. In INS-1(832/13) β-cells, PGE2 inhibited voltage-gated potassium currents and electrical activity through EP2/4 receptors and Kv2.2 channels. Knockdown of Kcnb2 reduced the action potential firing frequency and alleviated the inhibition of PGE2 on GSIS in INS-1(832/13) β-cells. PGE2 impaired glucose tolerance in wild-type mice but did not alter glucose tolerance in Kcnb2 knockout mice. Knockout of Kcnb2 reduced electrical activity, GSIS and abrogated the inhibition of PGE2 on GSIS in mouse islets. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that PGE2 inhibits GSIS in pancreatic β-cells through the EP2/4-Kv2.2 signaling pathway. The findings highlight the significant role of Kv2.2 channels in the regulation of β-cell repetitive firing and insulin secretion, and contribute to the understanding of the molecular basis of β-cell dysfunction in diabetes.