Structural rearrangement of amyloid-β upon inhibitor binding suppresses formation of Alzheimer disease related oligomers

Abstract

The formation of oligomers of the amyloid-β peptide plays a key role in the onset of Alzheimer's disease. We describe herein the investigation of disease-relevant small amyloid-β oligomers by mass spectrometry and ion mobility spectrometry, revealing functionally relevant structural attributes. In particular we can show that amyloid-β oligomers develop in two distinct arrangements leading to either neurotoxic oligomers and fibrils or non-toxic amorphous aggregates. Comprehending the key-attributes responsible for those pathways on a molecular level is a pre-requisite to specifically target the peptide's tertiary structure with the aim to promote the emergence of non-toxic aggregates. Here we show for two fibril inhibiting ligands, an ionic molecular tweezer and a hydrophobic peptide that despite their different interaction mechanisms, the suppression of the fibril pathway can be deduced from the disappearance of the corresponding structure of the first amyloid-β oligomers.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tobias Lieblein

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6497-1733
  2. Rene Zangl

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Janosch Martin

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jan Hoffmann

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Marie J Hutchison

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Tina Stark

    Institute for Organic Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Elke Stirnal

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Thomas Schrader

    Department of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Harald Schwalbe

    Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Nina Morgner

    Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
    For correspondence
    morgner@chemie.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1872-490X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK1986)

  • Nina Morgner

LOEWE Schwerpunkt from State of Hesse (GLUE)

  • Nina Morgner

Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt (MacromolecularComplexes)

  • Nina Morgner

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Heisenbergprofessorship)

  • Nina Morgner

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC1093)

  • Thomas Schrader

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Lieblein et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,906
    views
  • 314
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tobias Lieblein
  2. Rene Zangl
  3. Janosch Martin
  4. Jan Hoffmann
  5. Marie J Hutchison
  6. Tina Stark
  7. Elke Stirnal
  8. Thomas Schrader
  9. Harald Schwalbe
  10. Nina Morgner
(2020)
Structural rearrangement of amyloid-β upon inhibitor binding suppresses formation of Alzheimer disease related oligomers
eLife 9:e59306.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59306

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59306

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens, Katharina Hutterer ... Tina B Lonsdorf
    Research Article

    Childhood adversity is a strong predictor of developing psychopathological conditions. Multiple theories on the mechanisms underlying this association have been suggested which, however, differ in the operationalization of ‘exposure.’ Altered (threat) learning mechanisms represent central mechanisms by which environmental inputs shape emotional and cognitive processes and ultimately behavior. 1402 healthy participants underwent a fear conditioning paradigm (acquisition training, generalization), while acquiring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings (arousal, valence, and contingency). Childhood adversity was operationalized as (1) dichotomization, and following (2) the specificity model, (3) the cumulative risk model, and (4) the dimensional model. Individuals exposed to childhood adversity showed blunted physiological reactivity in SCRs, but not ratings, and reduced CS+/CS- discrimination during both phases, mainly driven by attenuated CS+ responding. The latter was evident across different operationalizations of ‘exposure’ following the different theories. None of the theories tested showed clear explanatory superiority. Notably, a remarkably different pattern of increased responding to the CS- is reported in the literature for anxiety patients, suggesting that individuals exposed to childhood adversity may represent a specific sub-sample. We highlight that theories linking childhood adversity to (vulnerability to) psychopathology need refinement.

    1. Neuroscience
    William T Redman, Santiago Acosta-Mendoza ... Michael J Goard
    Research Article

    Although grid cells are one of the most well-studied functional classes of neurons in the mammalian brain, whether there is a single orientation and spacing value per grid module has not been carefully tested. We analyze a recent large-scale recording of medial entorhinal cortex to characterize the presence and degree of heterogeneity of grid properties within individual modules. We find evidence for small, but robust, variability and hypothesize that this property of the grid code could enhance the encoding of local spatial information. Performing analysis on synthetic populations of grid cells, where we have complete control over the amount heterogeneity in grid properties, we demonstrate that grid property variability of a similar magnitude to the analyzed data leads to significantly decreased decoding error. This holds even when restricted to activity from a single module. Our results highlight how the heterogeneity of the neural response properties may benefit coding and opens new directions for theoretical and experimental analysis of grid cells.