Systematic functional analysis of Rab GTPases reveals limits of neuronal robustness to environmental challenges in flies

  1. Friederike Elisabeth Kohrs
  2. Ilsa-Maria Daumann
  3. Bojana Pavlovic
  4. Eugene Jennifer Jin
  5. F. Ridvan Kiral
  6. Shih-Ching Lin
  7. Filip Port
  8. Heike Wolfenberg
  9. Thomas F Mathejczyk
  10. Gerit A Linneweber
  11. Chih-Chiang Chan
  12. Michael Boutros
  13. P Robin Hiesinger  Is a corresponding author
  1. Free University Berlin, Germany
  2. Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
  3. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany
  4. National Taiwan University, Taiwan
  5. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Heidelberg University, Germany
  6. Institute for Biology Free University Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Rab GTPases are molecular switches that regulate membrane trafficking in all cells. Neurons have particular demands on membrane trafficking and express numerous Rab GTPases of unknown function. Here we report the generation and characterization of molecularly defined null mutants for all 26 rab genes in Drosophila. In flies, all rab genes are expressed in the nervous system where at least half exhibit particularly high levels compared to other tissues. Surprisingly, loss of any of these 13 nervous system-enriched Rabs yielded viable and fertile flies without obvious morphological defects. However, all 13 mutants differentially affected development when challenged with different temperatures, or neuronal function when challenged with continuous stimulation. We identified a synaptic maintenance defect following continuous stimulation for six mutants, including an autophagy-independent role of rab26. The complete mutant collection generated in this study provides a basis for further comprehensive studies of Rab GTPases during development and function in vivo.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Friederike Elisabeth Kohrs

    Division of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Ilsa-Maria Daumann

    Division of Neurobilogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Bojana Pavlovic

    Div. Signaling and Functional Genomics and Heidelberg University, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Eugene Jennifer Jin

    Division of Neurobilogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. F. Ridvan Kiral

    Division of Neurobilogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Shih-Ching Lin

    Graduate Institute of Physiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2960-5348
  7. Filip Port

    Div. Signaling and Functional Genomics and Heidelberg University, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5157-4835
  8. Heike Wolfenberg

    Division of Neurobilogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Thomas F Mathejczyk

    Division of Neurobilogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Gerit A Linneweber

    Division of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Chih-Chiang Chan

    Graduate Institute of Physiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2626-3805
  12. Michael Boutros

    Division Signaling and Functional Genomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9458-817X
  13. P Robin Hiesinger

    Division of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    For correspondence
    prh@zedat.fu-berlin.de
    Competing interests
    P Robin Hiesinger, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4698-3527

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR186)

  • P Robin Hiesinger

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR186)

  • Michael Boutros

National Institutes of Health (RO1EY018884)

  • P Robin Hiesinger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Kohrs et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,308
    views
  • 419
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Friederike Elisabeth Kohrs
  2. Ilsa-Maria Daumann
  3. Bojana Pavlovic
  4. Eugene Jennifer Jin
  5. F. Ridvan Kiral
  6. Shih-Ching Lin
  7. Filip Port
  8. Heike Wolfenberg
  9. Thomas F Mathejczyk
  10. Gerit A Linneweber
  11. Chih-Chiang Chan
  12. Michael Boutros
  13. P Robin Hiesinger
(2021)
Systematic functional analysis of Rab GTPases reveals limits of neuronal robustness to environmental challenges in flies
eLife 10:e59594.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59594

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59594

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.