Systematic functional analysis of Rab GTPases reveals limits of neuronal robustness to environmental challenges in flies

  1. Friederike Elisabeth Kohrs
  2. Ilsa-Maria Daumann
  3. Bojana Pavlovic
  4. Eugene Jennifer Jin
  5. F. Ridvan Kiral
  6. Shih-Ching Lin
  7. Filip Port
  8. Heike Wolfenberg
  9. Thomas F Mathejczyk
  10. Gerit A Linneweber
  11. Chih-Chiang Chan
  12. Michael Boutros
  13. P Robin Hiesinger  Is a corresponding author
  1. Free University Berlin, Germany
  2. Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
  3. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany
  4. National Taiwan University, Taiwan
  5. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Heidelberg University, Germany
  6. Institute for Biology Free University Berlin, Germany

Abstract

Rab GTPases are molecular switches that regulate membrane trafficking in all cells. Neurons have particular demands on membrane trafficking and express numerous Rab GTPases of unknown function. Here we report the generation and characterization of molecularly defined null mutants for all 26 rab genes in Drosophila. In flies, all rab genes are expressed in the nervous system where at least half exhibit particularly high levels compared to other tissues. Surprisingly, loss of any of these 13 nervous system-enriched Rabs yielded viable and fertile flies without obvious morphological defects. However, all 13 mutants differentially affected development when challenged with different temperatures, or neuronal function when challenged with continuous stimulation. We identified a synaptic maintenance defect following continuous stimulation for six mutants, including an autophagy-independent role of rab26. The complete mutant collection generated in this study provides a basis for further comprehensive studies of Rab GTPases during development and function in vivo.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Friederike Elisabeth Kohrs

    Division of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Ilsa-Maria Daumann

    Division of Neurobilogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Bojana Pavlovic

    Div. Signaling and Functional Genomics and Heidelberg University, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Eugene Jennifer Jin

    Division of Neurobilogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. F. Ridvan Kiral

    Division of Neurobilogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Shih-Ching Lin

    Graduate Institute of Physiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2960-5348
  7. Filip Port

    Div. Signaling and Functional Genomics and Heidelberg University, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5157-4835
  8. Heike Wolfenberg

    Division of Neurobilogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Thomas F Mathejczyk

    Division of Neurobilogy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Gerit A Linneweber

    Division of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Chih-Chiang Chan

    Graduate Institute of Physiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2626-3805
  12. Michael Boutros

    Division Signaling and Functional Genomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9458-817X
  13. P Robin Hiesinger

    Division of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    For correspondence
    prh@zedat.fu-berlin.de
    Competing interests
    P Robin Hiesinger, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4698-3527

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR186)

  • P Robin Hiesinger

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR186)

  • Michael Boutros

National Institutes of Health (RO1EY018884)

  • P Robin Hiesinger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Kohrs et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,259
    views
  • 414
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Friederike Elisabeth Kohrs
  2. Ilsa-Maria Daumann
  3. Bojana Pavlovic
  4. Eugene Jennifer Jin
  5. F. Ridvan Kiral
  6. Shih-Ching Lin
  7. Filip Port
  8. Heike Wolfenberg
  9. Thomas F Mathejczyk
  10. Gerit A Linneweber
  11. Chih-Chiang Chan
  12. Michael Boutros
  13. P Robin Hiesinger
(2021)
Systematic functional analysis of Rab GTPases reveals limits of neuronal robustness to environmental challenges in flies
eLife 10:e59594.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59594

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59594

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bethany M Bartlett, Yatendra Kumar ... Wendy A Bickmore
    Research Article Updated

    During oncogene-induced senescence there are striking changes in the organisation of heterochromatin in the nucleus. This is accompanied by activation of a pro-inflammatory gene expression programme – the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) – driven by transcription factors such as NF-κB. The relationship between heterochromatin re-organisation and the SASP has been unclear. Here, we show that TPR, a protein of the nuclear pore complex basket required for heterochromatin re-organisation during senescence, is also required for the very early activation of NF-κB signalling during the stress-response phase of oncogene-induced senescence. This is prior to activation of the SASP and occurs without affecting NF-κB nuclear import. We show that TPR is required for the activation of innate immune signalling at these early stages of senescence and we link this to the formation of heterochromatin-enriched cytoplasmic chromatin fragments thought to bleb off from the nuclear periphery. We show that HMGA1 is also required for cytoplasmic chromatin fragment formation. Together these data suggest that re-organisation of heterochromatin is involved in altered structural integrity of the nuclear periphery during senescence, and that this can lead to activation of cytoplasmic nucleic acid sensing, NF-κB signalling, and activation of the SASP.

    1. Cell Biology
    Jarno Mäkelä, Alexandros Papagiannakis ... Christine Jacobs-Wagner
    Research Article

    Defining the cellular factors that drive growth rate and proteome composition is essential for understanding and manipulating cellular systems. In bacteria, ribosome concentration is known to be a constraining factor of cell growth rate, while gene concentration is usually assumed not to be limiting. Here, using single-molecule tracking, quantitative single-cell microscopy, and modeling, we show that genome dilution in Escherichia coli cells arrested for DNA replication limits total RNA polymerase activity within physiological cell sizes across tested nutrient conditions. This rapid-onset limitation on bulk transcription results in sub-linear scaling of total active ribosomes with cell size and sub-exponential growth. Such downstream effects on bulk translation and cell growth are near-immediately detectable in a nutrient-rich medium, but delayed in nutrient-poor conditions, presumably due to cellular buffering activities. RNA sequencing and tandem-mass-tag mass spectrometry experiments further reveal that genome dilution remodels the relative abundance of mRNAs and proteins with cell size at a global level. Altogether, our findings indicate that chromosome concentration is a limiting factor of transcription and a global modulator of the transcriptome and proteome composition in E. coli. Experiments in Caulobacter crescentus and comparison with eukaryotic cell studies identify broadly conserved DNA concentration-dependent scaling principles of gene expression.