Distinct subpopulations of mechanosensory chordotonal organ neurons elicit grooming of the fruit fly antennae

  1. Stefanie Hampel  Is a corresponding author
  2. Katharina Eichler
  3. Daichi Yamada
  4. Davi Bock
  5. Azusa Kamikouchi
  6. Andrew M Seeds  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, Puerto Rico
  2. Nagoya University, Japan
  3. University of Vermont, United States

Abstract

Diverse mechanosensory neurons detect different mechanical forces that can impact animal behavior. Yet our understanding of the anatomical and physiological diversity of these neurons and the behaviors that they influence is limited. We previously discovered that grooming of the Drosophila melanogaster antennae is elicited by an antennal mechanosensory chordotonal organ, the Johnston's organ (JO) (Hampel et al., 2015). Here, we describe anatomically and physiologically distinct JO mechanosensory neuron subpopulations that each elicit antennal grooming. We show that the subpopulations project to different, discrete zones in the brain and differ in their responses to mechanical stimulation of the antennae. Although activation of each subpopulation elicits antennal grooming, distinct subpopulations also elicit the additional behaviors of wing flapping or backward locomotion. Our results provide a comprehensive description of the diversity of mechanosensory neurons in the JO, and reveal that distinct JO subpopulations can elicit both common and distinct behavioral responses.

Data availability

Neuron reconstructions will be made available on https://v2.virtualflybrain.org/

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Stefanie Hampel

    Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
    For correspondence
    stef.hampel@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8287-549X
  2. Katharina Eichler

    Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7833-8621
  3. Daichi Yamada

    Division of Biological Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Davi Bock

    Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8218-7926
  5. Azusa Kamikouchi

    Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1552-6892
  6. Andrew M Seeds

    Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
    For correspondence
    seeds.andrew@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4932-6496

Funding

Whitehall Foundation (2017-12-69)

  • Andrew M Seeds

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (MD007600)

  • Andrew M Seeds

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM103642)

  • Stefanie Hampel
  • Andrew M Seeds

Puerto Rico Science, Technology and Research Trust (2020-00195)

  • Andrew M Seeds

National Science Foundation (HRD-1736019)

  • Andrew M Seeds

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Hampel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,110
    views
  • 343
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Stefanie Hampel
  2. Katharina Eichler
  3. Daichi Yamada
  4. Davi Bock
  5. Azusa Kamikouchi
  6. Andrew M Seeds
(2020)
Distinct subpopulations of mechanosensory chordotonal organ neurons elicit grooming of the fruit fly antennae
eLife 9:e59976.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59976

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59976

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (8 total) in a conditioned suppression setting, using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. The shock-paired visual cue further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an Immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.

    1. Neuroscience
    Agnieszka Glica, Katarzyna Wasilewska ... Katarzyna Jednoróg
    Research Article

    The neural noise hypothesis of dyslexia posits an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) brain activity as an underlying mechanism of reading difficulties. This study provides the first direct test of this hypothesis using both electroencephalography (EEG) power spectrum measures in 120 Polish adolescents and young adults (60 with dyslexia, 60 controls) and glutamate (Glu) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at 7T MRI scanner in half of the sample. Our results, supported by Bayesian statistics, show no evidence of E/I balance differences between groups, challenging the hypothesis that cortical hyperexcitability underlies dyslexia. These findings suggest that alternative mechanisms must be explored and highlight the need for further research into the E/I balance and its role in neurodevelopmental disorders.