The organizational principles of de-differentiated topographic maps in somatosensory cortex

  1. Peng Liu
  2. Anastasia Chrysidou
  3. Juliane Doehler
  4. Martin Hebart
  5. Thomas Wolbers
  6. Esther Kuehn  Is a corresponding author
  1. Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany
  3. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Germany

Abstract

Topographic maps are a fundamental feature of cortex architecture in the mammalian brain. One common theory is that the de-differentiation of topographic maps links to impairments in everyday behavior due to less precise functional map readouts. Here, we tested this theory by characterizing de-differentiated topographic maps in primary somatosensory cortex (SI) of younger and older adults by means of ultra-high resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging together with perceptual finger individuation and hand motor performance. Older adults' SI maps showed similar amplitude and size to younger adults' maps, but presented with less representational similarity between distant fingers. Larger population receptive field sizes in older adults' maps did not correlate with behavior, whereas reduced cortical distances between D2 and D3 related to worse finger individuation but better motor performance. Our data uncover the drawbacks of a simple de-differentiation model of topographic map function, and motivate the introduction of feature-based models of cortical reorganization.

Data availability

Behavioral and MRI data have been deposited in dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.mgqnk98x8)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Peng Liu

    Institute for Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Anastasia Chrysidou

    Institute for Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Juliane Doehler

    Institute for Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Martin Hebart

    Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Thomas Wolbers

    RG Aging & Cognition, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Esther Kuehn

    Institute for Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    esther.kuehn@dzne.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3169-1951

Funding

Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (ESIF/EFRE 2014-2020; FKZ: ZS/2016/04/78113)

  • Esther Kuehn

German Research Foundation (KU 3711/2-1,project number: 423633679)

  • Peng Liu
  • Juliane Doehler

Else Kroener Fresenius Stiftung (2019-A03)

  • Anastasia Chrysidou

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants were paid for their attendance and written informed consent for participation and data handling was received from all participants before starting the experiment. The study was approved by the Ethics committee of the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg (68/16).

Copyright

© 2021, Liu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,573
    views
  • 221
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Peng Liu
  2. Anastasia Chrysidou
  3. Juliane Doehler
  4. Martin Hebart
  5. Thomas Wolbers
  6. Esther Kuehn
(2021)
The organizational principles of de-differentiated topographic maps in somatosensory cortex
eLife 10:e60090.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60090

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60090

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Morgan Fitzgerald, Eena Kosik, Bradley Voytek
    Insight

    Changes in neural activity thought to reflect brain aging may be partly influenced by age-dependent signals ‘leaking’ from the heart.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Yujiang Wang, Karoline Leiberg ... Bruno Mota
    Research Article

    The cerebral cortex displays a bewildering diversity of shapes and sizes across and within species. Despite this diversity, we present a universal multi-scale description of primate cortices. We show that all cortical shapes can be described as a set of nested folds of different sizes. As neighbouring folds are gradually merged, the cortices of 11 primate species follow a common scale-free morphometric trajectory, that also overlaps with over 70 other mammalian species. Our results indicate that all cerebral cortices are approximations of the same archetypal fractal shape with a fractal dimension of df = 2.5. Importantly, this new understanding enables a more precise quantification of brain morphology as a function of scale. To demonstrate the importance of this new understanding, we show a scale-dependent effect of ageing on brain morphology. We observe a more than fourfold increase in effect size (from two standard deviations to eight standard deviations) at a spatial scale of approximately 2 mm compared to standard morphological analyses. Our new understanding may, therefore, generate superior biomarkers for a range of conditions in the future.