The organizational principles of de-differentiated topographic maps in somatosensory cortex

  1. Peng Liu
  2. Anastasia Chrysidou
  3. Juliane Doehler
  4. Martin Hebart
  5. Thomas Wolbers
  6. Esther Kuehn  Is a corresponding author
  1. Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany
  3. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Germany

Abstract

Topographic maps are a fundamental feature of cortex architecture in the mammalian brain. One common theory is that the de-differentiation of topographic maps links to impairments in everyday behavior due to less precise functional map readouts. Here, we tested this theory by characterizing de-differentiated topographic maps in primary somatosensory cortex (SI) of younger and older adults by means of ultra-high resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging together with perceptual finger individuation and hand motor performance. Older adults' SI maps showed similar amplitude and size to younger adults' maps, but presented with less representational similarity between distant fingers. Larger population receptive field sizes in older adults' maps did not correlate with behavior, whereas reduced cortical distances between D2 and D3 related to worse finger individuation but better motor performance. Our data uncover the drawbacks of a simple de-differentiation model of topographic map function, and motivate the introduction of feature-based models of cortical reorganization.

Data availability

Behavioral and MRI data have been deposited in dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.mgqnk98x8)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Peng Liu

    Institute for Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Anastasia Chrysidou

    Institute for Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Juliane Doehler

    Institute for Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Martin Hebart

    Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Thomas Wolbers

    RG Aging & Cognition, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Esther Kuehn

    Institute for Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    esther.kuehn@dzne.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3169-1951

Funding

Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (ESIF/EFRE 2014-2020; FKZ: ZS/2016/04/78113)

  • Esther Kuehn

German Research Foundation (KU 3711/2-1,project number: 423633679)

  • Peng Liu
  • Juliane Doehler

Else Kroener Fresenius Stiftung (2019-A03)

  • Anastasia Chrysidou

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants were paid for their attendance and written informed consent for participation and data handling was received from all participants before starting the experiment. The study was approved by the Ethics committee of the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg (68/16).

Copyright

© 2021, Liu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,682
    views
  • 232
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Peng Liu
  2. Anastasia Chrysidou
  3. Juliane Doehler
  4. Martin Hebart
  5. Thomas Wolbers
  6. Esther Kuehn
(2021)
The organizational principles of de-differentiated topographic maps in somatosensory cortex
eLife 10:e60090.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60090

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60090

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sisi Wang, Freek van Ede
    Research Article

    A classic distinction from the domain of external attention is that between anticipatory orienting and subsequent re-orienting of attention to unexpected events. Whether and how humans also re-orient attention ‘in mind’ following expected and unexpected working-memory tests remains elusive. We leveraged spatial modulations in neural activity and gaze to isolate re-orienting within the spatial layout of visual working memory following central memory tests of certain, expected, or unexpected mnemonic content. Besides internal orienting after predictive cues, we unveil a second stage of internal attentional deployment following both expected and unexpected memory tests. Following expected tests, internal attentional deployment was not contingent on prior orienting, suggesting an additional verification – ‘double checking’ – in memory. Following unexpected tests, re-focusing of alternative memory content was prolonged. This brings attentional re-orienting to the domain of working memory and underscores how memory tests can invoke either a verification or a revision of our internal focus.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow
    Research Article Updated

    Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions—the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)—while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal’s choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.