Abstract

To better understand a role of eIF4E S209 in oncogenic translation, we generated EIF4ES209A/+ heterozygous knockin (4EKI) HCT 116 human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. 4EKI had little on total eIF4E levels, cap binding or global translation, while markedly reduced HCT 116 cell growth in spheroids and mice, and CRC organoid growth. 4EKI strongly inhibited Myc and ATF4 translation, the integrated Stress Response (ISR)-dependent glutamine metabolic signature, AKT activation and proliferation in vivo. 4EKI inhibited polyposis in ApcMin/+ mice by suppressing Myc protein and AKT activation. Furthermore, p-eIF4E was highly elevated in CRC precursor lesions in mouse and human. p-eIF4E cooperated with mutant KRAS to promote Myc and ISR-dependent glutamine addiction in various CRC cell lines, characterized by increased cell death, transcriptomic heterogeneity and immune suppression upon deprivation. These findings demonstrate a critical role of eIF4E S209-dependent translation in Myc and stress-driven oncogenesis and as a potential therapeutic vulnerability.

Data availability

Microarray data is deposited in Dryad under doi:10.5061/dryad.tb2rbnzxm.All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated
    1. YU
    2. Jian
    (2020) Microarray data
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.5061/dryad.tb2rbnzxm.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hang Ruan

    Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Xiangyun Li

    Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Xiang Xu

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Brian J Leibowitz

    Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Jingshan Tong

    Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Lujia Chen

    Medical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Luoquan Ao

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Wei Xing

    Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Jianhua Luo

    Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Yanping Yu

    Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Robert E Schoen

    Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Nahum Sonenberg

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    Nahum Sonenberg, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4707-8759
  13. Xinghua Lu

    Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsbrugh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8599-2269
  14. Lin Zhang

    Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Jian Yu

    Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    For correspondence
    yuj2@upmc.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4021-1000

Funding

NIH (R01CA215481)

  • Jian Yu

NIH (R01CA172136)

  • Lin Zhang

NIH (R01CA203028)

  • Lin Zhang

NIH (R01CA236271)

  • Lin Zhang

NIH (R01LM012011)

  • Xinghua Lu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (# 19085635 and 18063020) of the University of Pittsburgh. All animal experiments were approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee under Animal welfare assurance number A-3187-01. No surgery or invasive procedure was performed and every effort was made to minimize suffering with humane sacrifice.

Copyright

© 2020, Ruan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,301
    views
  • 353
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hang Ruan
  2. Xiangyun Li
  3. Xiang Xu
  4. Brian J Leibowitz
  5. Jingshan Tong
  6. Lujia Chen
  7. Luoquan Ao
  8. Wei Xing
  9. Jianhua Luo
  10. Yanping Yu
  11. Robert E Schoen
  12. Nahum Sonenberg
  13. Xinghua Lu
  14. Lin Zhang
  15. Jian Yu
(2020)
eIF4E S209 phosphorylation licenses Myc-and stress-driven oncogenesis
eLife 9:e60151.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60151

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60151

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Zijing Wang, Bihan Xia ... Jilin Yang
    Research Article

    Bestrophin isoform 4 (BEST4) is a newly identified subtype of the calcium-activated chloride channel family. Analysis of colonic epithelial cell diversity by single-cell RNA-sequencing has revealed the existence of a cluster of BEST4+ mature colonocytes in humans. However, if the role of BEST4 is involved in regulating tumour progression remains largely unknown. In this study, we demonstrate that BEST4 overexpression attenuates cell proliferation, colony formation, and mobility in colorectal cancer (CRC) in vitro, and impedes the tumour growth and the liver metastasis in vivo. BEST4 is co-expressed with hairy/enhancer of split 4 (HES4) in the nucleus of cells, and HES4 signals BEST4 by interacting with the upstream region of the BEST4 promoter. BEST4 is epistatic to HES4 and downregulates TWIST1, thereby inhibiting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in CRC. Conversely, knockout of BEST4 using CRISPR/Cas9 in CRC cells revitalises tumour growth and induces EMT. Furthermore, the low level of the BEST4 mRNA is correlated with advanced and the worse prognosis, suggesting its potential role involving CRC progression.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Bruno Bockorny, Lakshmi Muthuswamy ... Senthil K Muthuswamy
    Tools and Resources

    Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of all common tumors. Earlier cancer diagnosis could increase survival rates and better assessment of metastatic disease could improve patient care. As such, there is an urgent need to develop biomarkers to diagnose this deadly malignancy. Analyzing circulating extracellular vesicles (cEVs) using ‘liquid biopsies’ offers an attractive approach to diagnose and monitor disease status. However, it is important to differentiate EV-associated proteins enriched in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from those with benign pancreatic diseases such as chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). To meet this need, we combined the novel EVtrap method for highly efficient isolation of EVs from plasma and conducted proteomics analysis of samples from 124 individuals, including patients with PDAC, benign pancreatic diseases and controls. On average, 912 EV proteins were identified per 100 µL of plasma. EVs containing high levels of PDCD6IP, SERPINA12, and RUVBL2 were associated with PDAC compared to the benign diseases in both discovery and validation cohorts. EVs with PSMB4, RUVBL2, and ANKAR were associated with metastasis, and those with CRP, RALB, and CD55 correlated with poor clinical prognosis. Finally, we validated a seven EV protein PDAC signature against a background of benign pancreatic diseases that yielded an 89% prediction accuracy for the diagnosis of PDAC. To our knowledge, our study represents the largest proteomics profiling of circulating EVs ever conducted in pancreatic cancer and provides a valuable open-source atlas to the scientific community with a comprehensive catalogue of novel cEVs that may assist in the development of biomarkers and improve the outcomes of patients with PDAC.