Metabolic control of cellular immune-competency by odors in Drosophila

  1. Sukanya Madhwal
  2. Mingyu Shin
  3. Ankita Kapoor
  4. Manisha Goyal
  5. Manish K Joshi
  6. Pirzada Mujeeb Ur Rehman
  7. Kavan Gor
  8. Jiwon Shim  Is a corresponding author
  9. Tina Mukherjee  Is a corresponding author
  1. inStem, India
  2. Hanyang University, Republic of Korea
  3. Institut de Biologie, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, France
  4. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Germany

Abstract

Studies in different animal model systems have revealed the impact of odors on immune cells, however, any understanding on why and how odors control cellular immunity remained unclear. We find that Drosophila employ an olfactory-immune cross-talk to tune a specific cell type, the lamellocytes, from hematopoietic-progenitor cells. We show that neuronally released GABA derived upon olfactory stimulation, is utilized by blood-progenitor cells as a metabolite and through its catabolism, these cells stabilize Sima/HIFα protein. Sima capacitates blood-progenitor cells with the ability to initiate lamellocyte differentiation. This systemic axis becomes relevant for larvae dwelling in wasp-infested environments where chances of infection are high. By co-opting the olfactory route, the pre-conditioned animals elevate their systemic GABA levels leading to the up-regulation of blood-progenitor cell Sima expression. This elevates their immune-potential and primes them to respond rapidly when infected with parasitic wasps. The present work highlights the importance of the olfaction in immunity and shows how odor detection during animal development is utilized to establish a long-range axis in the control of blood-progenitor competency and immune-priming.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1-5 and Extended Data Figure 1-10.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sukanya Madhwal

    Regulation of Cell Fate, inStem, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mingyu Shin

    Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ankita Kapoor

    Regulation of Cell Fate, inStem, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Manisha Goyal

    Regulation of Cell Fate, inStem, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Manish K Joshi

    Développement de Marseille (IBDM), Institut de Biologie, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Pirzada Mujeeb Ur Rehman

    Regulation of Cell Fate, inStem, Bangalore, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Kavan Gor

    SCB unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jiwon Shim

    Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    jshim@hanyang.ac.kr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2409-1130
  9. Tina Mukherjee

    Regulation of Cell Fate, inStem, Bangalore, India
    For correspondence
    tinam@instem.res.in
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3776-5536

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (DBT/PR13446/COE/34/30/2015)

  • Tina Mukherjee

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (DST/ECR/2015/000390)

  • Tina Mukherjee

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (Ramalingaswami Fellowship)

  • Tina Mukherjee

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Bruno Lemaitre, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland

Version history

  1. Received: June 26, 2020
  2. Accepted: December 28, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 29, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 14, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Madhwal et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,100
    views
  • 583
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sukanya Madhwal
  2. Mingyu Shin
  3. Ankita Kapoor
  4. Manisha Goyal
  5. Manish K Joshi
  6. Pirzada Mujeeb Ur Rehman
  7. Kavan Gor
  8. Jiwon Shim
  9. Tina Mukherjee
(2020)
Metabolic control of cellular immune-competency by odors in Drosophila
eLife 9:e60376.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60376

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60376

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Edgar M Pera, Josefine Nilsson-De Moura ... Ivana Milas
    Research Article

    We previously showed that SerpinE2 and the serine protease HtrA1 modulate fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in germ layer specification and head-to-tail development of Xenopus embryos. Here, we present an extracellular proteolytic mechanism involving this serpin-protease system in the developing neural crest (NC). Knockdown of SerpinE2 by injected antisense morpholino oligonucleotides did not affect the specification of NC progenitors but instead inhibited the migration of NC cells, causing defects in dorsal fin, melanocyte, and craniofacial cartilage formation. Similarly, overexpression of the HtrA1 protease impaired NC cell migration and the formation of NC-derived structures. The phenotype of SerpinE2 knockdown was overcome by concomitant downregulation of HtrA1, indicating that SerpinE2 stimulates NC migration by inhibiting endogenous HtrA1 activity. SerpinE2 binds to HtrA1, and the HtrA1 protease triggers degradation of the cell surface proteoglycan Syndecan-4 (Sdc4). Microinjection of Sdc4 mRNA partially rescued NC migration defects induced by both HtrA1 upregulation and SerpinE2 downregulation. These epistatic experiments suggest a proteolytic pathway by a double inhibition mechanism:

    SerpinE2 ┤HtrA1 protease ┤Syndecan-4 → NC cell migration.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Kristine B Walhovd, Stine K Krogsrud ... Didac Vidal-Pineiro
    Research Article

    Human fetal development has been associated with brain health at later stages. It is unknown whether growth in utero, as indexed by birth weight (BW), relates consistently to lifespan brain characteristics and changes, and to what extent these influences are of a genetic or environmental nature. Here we show remarkably stable and lifelong positive associations between BW and cortical surface area and volume across and within developmental, aging and lifespan longitudinal samples (N = 5794, 4–82 y of age, w/386 monozygotic twins, followed for up to 8.3 y w/12,088 brain MRIs). In contrast, no consistent effect of BW on brain changes was observed. Partly environmental effects were indicated by analysis of twin BW discordance. In conclusion, the influence of prenatal growth on cortical topography is stable and reliable through the lifespan. This early-life factor appears to influence the brain by association of brain reserve, rather than brain maintenance. Thus, fetal influences appear omnipresent in the spacetime of the human brain throughout the human lifespan. Optimizing fetal growth may increase brain reserve for life, also in aging.