Synergy between Wsp1 and Dip1 may initiate assembly of endocytic actin networks

  1. Connor John Balzer
  2. Michael L James
  3. Heidy Y Narvaez-Ortiz
  4. Luke A Helgeson
  5. Vladimir Sirotkin
  6. Brad J Nolen  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Oregon, United States
  2. Upstate Medical University, United States
  3. University of Washington, United States

Abstract

The actin filament nucleator Arp2/3 complex is activated at cortical sites in S. pombe to assemble branched actin networks that drive endocytosis. Arp2/3 complex activators Wsp1 and Dip1 are required for proper actin assembly at endocytic sites, but how they coordinately control Arp2/3-mediated actin assembly is unknown. Alone, Dip1 activates Arp2/3 complex without preexisting actin filaments to nucleate 'seed' filaments that activate Wsp1-bound Arp2/3 complex, thereby initiating branched actin network assembly. In contrast, because Wsp1 requires pre-existing filaments to activate, it has been assumed to function exclusively in propagating actin networks by stimulating branching from pre-existing filaments. Here we show that Wsp1 is important not only for propagation, but also for initiation of endocytic actin networks. Using single molecule TIRF microscopy we show that Wsp1 synergizes with Dip1 to co-activate Arp2/3 complex. Synergistic coactivation does not require pre-existing actin filaments, explaining how Wsp1 contributes to actin network initiation in cells.

Data availability

All data generated and analyzed in this study have been included in the manuscript and supporting source data files. An individual source data file has been provided for Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Connor John Balzer

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Michael L James

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Heidy Y Narvaez-Ortiz

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Luke A Helgeson

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5112-2751
  5. Vladimir Sirotkin

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Brad J Nolen

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States
    For correspondence
    bnolen@uoregon.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0224-9980

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM136319)

  • Brad J Nolen

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM007759)

  • Connor John Balzer
  • Luke A Helgeson

American Heart Association (18PRE33960110)

  • Connor John Balzer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Alphee Michelot, Institut de Biologie du Développement, France

Version history

  1. Received: June 26, 2020
  2. Accepted: November 10, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: November 12, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 1, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Balzer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,227
    views
  • 161
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Connor John Balzer
  2. Michael L James
  3. Heidy Y Narvaez-Ortiz
  4. Luke A Helgeson
  5. Vladimir Sirotkin
  6. Brad J Nolen
(2020)
Synergy between Wsp1 and Dip1 may initiate assembly of endocytic actin networks
eLife 9:e60419.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60419

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60419

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.