Qki regulates myelinogenesis through Srebp2-dependent cholesterol biosynthesis

  1. Xin Zhou
  2. Seula Shin
  3. Chenxi He
  4. Qiang Zhang
  5. Matthew N Rasband
  6. Jiangong Ren
  7. Congxin Dai
  8. Rocío I Zorrilla-Veloz
  9. Takashi Shingu
  10. Liang Yuan
  11. Yunfei Wang
  12. Yiwen Chen
  13. Fei Lan
  14. Jian Hu  Is a corresponding author
  1. MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
  2. Fudan University, China
  3. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  4. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China
  5. Tufts University, United States

Abstract

Myelination depends on timely, precise control of oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelinogenesis. Cholesterol is the most abundant component of myelin and essential for myelin membrane assembly in the central nervous system. However, the underlying mechanisms of precise control of cholesterol biosynthesis in oligodendrocytes remain elusive. In the present study, we found that Qki depletion in neural stem cells or oligodendrocyte precursor cells in neonatal mice resulted in impaired cholesterol biosynthesis and defective myelinogenesis without compromising their differentiation into Aspa+Gstpi+ myelinating oligodendrocytes. Mechanistically, Qki-5 functions as a co-activator of Srebp2 to control transcription of the genes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis in oligodendrocytes. Consequently, Qki depletion led to substantially reduced concentration of the cholesterol in mouse brain, impairing proper myelin assembly. Our study demonstrated that Qki-Srebp2–controlled cholesterol biosynthesis is indispensable for myelinogenesis and highlights a novel function of Qki as a transcriptional co-activator beyond its canonical function as an RNA-binding protein.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE145116, GSE145117 and GSE144756

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xin Zhou

    Department of Cancer Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Seula Shin

    Department of Cancer Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Chenxi He

    Liver Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Qiang Zhang

    Department of Cancer Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Matthew N Rasband

    Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8184-2477
  6. Jiangong Ren

    Department of Cancer Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Congxin Dai

    Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Rocío I Zorrilla-Veloz

    Department of Cancer Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Takashi Shingu

    Department of Cancer Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Liang Yuan

    Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Yunfei Wang

    Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yiwen Chen

    Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Fei Lan

    Liver Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Jian Hu

    Department of Cancer Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    JHu3@mdanderson.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9760-2013

Funding

NCI (R37CA214800)

  • Jian Hu

MD Anderson Cancer Center (startup)

  • Jian Hu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse experiments were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the MD Anderson Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. (IACUC Study #00001392-RN01)

Copyright

© 2021, Zhou et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,385
    views
  • 422
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xin Zhou
  2. Seula Shin
  3. Chenxi He
  4. Qiang Zhang
  5. Matthew N Rasband
  6. Jiangong Ren
  7. Congxin Dai
  8. Rocío I Zorrilla-Veloz
  9. Takashi Shingu
  10. Liang Yuan
  11. Yunfei Wang
  12. Yiwen Chen
  13. Fei Lan
  14. Jian Hu
(2021)
Qki regulates myelinogenesis through Srebp2-dependent cholesterol biosynthesis
eLife 10:e60467.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60467

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60467

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Nathaniel C Nelson, Matthias C Kugler
    Insight

    Cells called alveolar myofibroblasts, which have a central role in the development of the lung after birth, receive an orchestrated input from a range of different signaling pathways.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Max Henry Hills, Limei Ma ... C Ron Yu
    Tools and Resources

    We have generated single cell transcriptomic atlases of vomeronasal organs (VNO) from juvenile and adult mice. Combined with spatial molecular imaging, we uncover a distinct, previously unidentified class of cells that express the vomeronasal receptors (VRs) and a population of canonical olfactory sensory neurons in the VNO. High-resolution trajectory and cluster analyses reveal the lineage relationship, spatial distribution of cell types, and a putative cascade of molecular events that specify the V1r, V2r, and OR lineages from a common stem cell population. The expression of vomeronasal and olfactory receptors follow power law distributions, but there is high variability in average expression levels between individual receptor and cell types. Substantial co-expression is found between receptors across clades, from different classes, and between olfactory and VRs, with nearly half from pairs located on the same chromosome. Interestingly, the expression of V2r, but not V1r, genes is associated with various transcription factors, suggesting distinct mechanisms of receptor choice associated with the two cell types. We identify association between transcription factors, surface axon guidance molecules, and individual VRs, thereby uncovering a molecular code that guides the specification of the vomeronasal circuitry. Our study provides a wealth of data on the development and organization of the accessory olfactory system at both cellular and molecular levels to enable a deeper understanding of vomeronasal system function.