(A) Number of participants for each study and group (see Table 12 for details). (B) Stacked histograms showing the distribution of BDI or PHQ-9 scores in each study and each group. (C) Channel …
(A) Schematic depiction of given statistical contrast: group comparisons (left) vs regression (right). (B) Specification of each contrast against depression scores. Left panel shows a schematic …
Panels A and B show 2 of 3 significant channel pair results: average referenced F3–F4 channel pair for Studies I (A) and V (B). The remaining panels (C and D) show other channel pair analysis …
More positive (red) t values indicate more right-sided (less left-sided) alpha asymmetry for diagnosed participants. More negative (blue) t values indicate more right-sided (less left-sided) FAA for …
Topographies of effects are presented in a reference by study matrix. Color bar on the right presents color coding for the t values: more positive (red)/negative (blue) relationship between FAA and …
Topographies of effects are presented in a reference by study matrix. Color bar on the right presents color coding for the t values: more positive (red)/negative (blue) relationship between FAA and …
Topographies of different contrast effects in a reference by study matrix. More positive (red) t values indicate more right-sided (less left-sided) alpha asymmetry for subclinical participants. More …
First row shows topography of average alpha power for both groups; second row shows topography of average alpha asymmetry for both groups.
(A) The logic of the topographical plots is the same as in Figure 4. (B) Swarmplots corresponding to studies in panel A showing the between-group difference in the selected confounding variables. …
Heatmaps in the upper part of each panel represent regression t values for channel by frequency search space. More positive/negative t values indicate higher/lower power with higher BDI. Clusters …
Heatmaps in the upper part of each panel represent regression t values for channel by frequency search space. More positive/negative t values indicate higher/lower power with higher BDI. Clusters …
Heatmaps in the upper part of each panel represent regression t values for channel by frequency search space. More positive/negative t values indicate higher/lower power with higher BDI. Clusters …
Heatmaps in the upper part of each panel represent t values for channel by frequency search space. More positive (red) t values indicate higher power in given channel and frequency for diagnosed …
Heatmaps in the upper part of each panel represent t values for channel by frequency search space. More positive (red) t values indicate higher power in given channel and frequency for diagnosed …
Cluster limits are marked with white outlines, and corresponding cluster p-values are shown below each panel. Color bar at the bottom presents color coding for the t values.
Cluster limits are marked with white outlines, and corresponding cluster p-values are shown below each panel. Color bar at the bottom presents color coding for the t values: more positive …
Cluster limits are marked with white outlines, and corresponding cluster p-values are shown below each panel. Color bar at the bottom presents color coding for the t values: more positive …
Cluster limits are marked with white outlines, corresponding cluster p-values are shown below each panel. More positive (red) t values indicate more right-sided (less left-sided) alpha asymmetry for …
Cluster limits are marked with white outlines, corresponding cluster p-values are shown below each panel. More positive (red) t values indicate more right-sided (less left-sided) alpha asymmetry for …
Each row corresponds to one analysis on a single channel pair. The contrasts, studies, and channel pairs are labeled on the y axis. The black dots correspond to observed effect sizes in Cohen’s …
Each row corresponds to one analysis on a single channel pair. The contrasts, studies, and channel pairs are labeled on the y axis. The black dots correspond to observed effect sizes in Cohen’s …
In group contrasts (A) the interaction term is female * diagnosed; in linear contrasts (B) it is female * depression score. Each row corresponds to one analysis on a single channel pair. The …
Cluster limits are marked with white outlines, and corresponding cluster p-values are shown below each panel. Color bar at the bottom presents color coding for the t values.
Cluster limits are marked with white outlines, and corresponding cluster p-values are shown below each panel. Color bar at the bottom presents color coding for the t values.
In group contrasts (DvsHC and SvsHC) the interaction term is female * diagnosed; in linear contrasts (DReg, allReg) it is female * depression score. Cluster limits are marked with white outlines, …
Each row represents two channel-pair results for a given contrast, study, and space combination; uncorrected for multiple comparisons. Electrode placement for each study is shown in Figure 1C. (N: …
No. | Contrast | Study | Space | N | Selected electrodes without correction | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pair 1 (F3–F4) | Pair 2 (F7–F8) | |||||||||||
t | p | ES | CI | t | p | ES | CI | |||||
1 | DvsHC | I | avg | 29 vs 22 | −2.073 | 0.043 | −0.573 | [−1.135,–0.024] | −0.365 | 0.717 | −0.101 | [−0.644, 0.465] |
2 | DvsHC | I | csd | 29 vs 22 | 0.132 | 0.896 | 0.038 | [−0.550, 0.608] | 0.553 | 0.583 | 0.153 | [−0.415, 0.689] |
3 | DvsHC | III | avg | 27 vs 21 | 0.904 | 0.371 | 0.247 | [−0.316, 0.689] | −0.536 | 0.595 | −0.145 | [−0.760, 0.452] |
4 | DvsHC | III | csd | 27 vs 21 | 0.849 | 0.401 | 0.226 | [−0.307, 0.721] | −0.129 | 0.898 | −0.035 | [−0.590, 0.536] |
5 | DvsHC | IV | avg | 22 vs 72 | 0.450 | 0.654 | 0.094 | [−0.310, 0.510] | 0.277 | 0.783 | 0.059 | [−0.413, 0.463] |
6 | DvsHC | IV | csd | 22 vs 72 | 0.767 | 0.449 | 0.212 | [−0.287, 0.771] | −1.396 | 0.172 | −0.345 | [−0.808, 0.167] |
7 | DvsHC | V | avg | 24 vs 29 | 2.823 | 0.007 | 0.743 | [0.218, 1.255] | 1.927 | 0.061 | 0.501 | [−0.023, 0.998] |
8 | DvsHC | V | csd | 24 vs 29 | 0.748 | 0.458 | 0.208 | [−0.380, 0.775] | −0.727 | 0.471 | −0.202 | [−0.766, 0.370] |
9 | SvsHC | II | avg | 23 vs 28 | 0.201 | 0.841 | 0.056 | [−0.502, 0.614] | −0.662 | 0.511 | −0.179 | [−0.780, 0.381] |
10 | SvsHC | II | csd | 23 vs 28 | 1.144 | 0.258 | 0.318 | [−0.221, 0.827] | −0.199 | 0.843 | −0.054 | [−0.611, 0.508] |
11 | SvsHC | III | avg | 33 vs 21 | −0.852 | 0.398 | −0.209 | [−0.640, 0.306] | −1.328 | 0.190 | −0.332 | [−0.804, 0.216] |
12 | SvsHC | III | csd | 33 vs 21 | −1.181 | 0.244 | −0.280 | [−0.730, 0.219] | −1.094 | 0.280 | −0.302 | [−0.798, 0.219] |
13 | SvsHC | IV | avg | 21 vs 72 | 1.359 | 0.184 | 0.346 | [−0.198, 0.816] | 1.247 | 0.219 | 0.254 | [−0.138, 0.646] |
14 | SvsHC | IV | csd | 21 vs 72 | 0.558 | 0.581 | 0.147 | [−0.393, 0.655] | 0.141 | 0.889 | 0.035 | [−0.388, 0.605] |
15 | allReg | I | avg | 54 | −1.138 | 0.260 | −0.156 | [−0.397, 0.088] | −0.180 | 0.858 | −0.025 | [−0.394, 0.258] |
16 | allReg | I | csd | 54 | −0.540 | 0.591 | −0.075 | [−0.309, 0.167] | 0.077 | 0.939 | 0.011 | [−0.335, 0.280] |
17 | allReg | III | avg | 91 | 0.545 | 0.587 | 0.058 | [−0.105, 0.263] | −0.781 | 0.437 | −0.083 | [−0.271, 0.101] |
18 | allReg | III | csd | 91 | 0.209 | 0.835 | 0.022 | [−0.169, 0.207] | 0.422 | 0.674 | 0.045 | [−0.168, 0.225] |
19 | allReg | IV | avg | 117 | 1.138 | 0.258 | 0.106 | [−0.076, 0.264] | 0.675 | 0.501 | 0.063 | [−0.111, 0.212] |
20 | allReg | IV | csd | 117 | 1.307 | 0.194 | 0.121 | [−0.096, 0.312] | −1.024 | 0.308 | −0.095 | [−0.265, 0.093] |
21 | allReg | V | avg | 53 | 2.489 | 0.016 | 0.329 | [0.106, 0.517] | 1.463 | 0.150 | 0.201 | [−0.023, 0.409] |
22 | allReg | V | csd | 53 | 0.857 | 0.395 | 0.119 | [−0.127, 0.361] | −0.220 | 0.827 | −0.031 | [−0.262, 0.210] |
23 | DReg | I | avg | 29 | 0.980 | 0.336 | 0.185 | [−0.212, 0.531] | 0.320 | 0.751 | 0.061 | [−0.470, 0.522] |
24 | DReg | I | csd | 29 | −1.303 | 0.204 | −0.243 | [−0.540, 0.091] | −0.504 | 0.618 | −0.097 | [−0.501, 0.337] |
25 | DReg | III | avg | 27 | 0.278 | 0.784 | 0.055 | [−0.268, 0.426] | 0.055 | 0.957 | 0.011 | [−0.273, 0.238] |
26 | DReg | III | csd | 27 | 0.407 | 0.688 | 0.081 | [−0.254, 0.413] | 1.347 | 0.190 | 0.260 | [−0.047, 0.498] |
27 | DReg | IV | avg | 22 | 1.754 | 0.095 | 0.365 | [0.012, 0.643] | −0.114 | 0.910 | −0.026 | [−0.459, 0.427] |
28 | DReg | IV | csd | 22 | 1.938 | 0.067 | 0.398 | [−0.043, 0.632] | −0.415 | 0.683 | −0.092 | [−0.519, 0.351] |
29 | DReg | V | avg | 24 | 1.497 | 0.149 | 0.304 | [0.045, 0.563] | −0.367 | 0.717 | −0.078 | [−0.444, 0.285] |
30 | DReg | V | csd | 24 | 0.789 | 0.438 | 0.166 | [−0.264, 0.501] | 0.635 | 0.532 | 0.134 | [−0.320, 0.615] |
DvsHC – diagnosed and healthy controls; SvsHC – sub-clinical and healthy controls; allReg – linear regression for all subjects together; DReg – linear regression for only diagnosed subjects; avg – average reference; csd – current source density.
Each row represents two channel-pair results for a given contrast, study, and space combination; uncorrected for multiple comparisons. Electrode placement for each study is shown in Figure 1C. (N: …
No. | Contrast | Study | Space | N | Selected electrodes corrected for confounds | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pair 1 (F3–F4) | Pair 2 (F7–F8) | |||||||||||
t | p | ES | CI | t | p | ES | CI | |||||
1 | DvsHC | I | avg | 29 vs 22 | −2.679 | 0.010 | −0.789 | [−1.413,–0.218] | −0.782 | 0.438 | −0.230 | [−0.691, 0.288] |
2 | DvsHC | I | csd | 29 vs 22 | 0.269 | 0.789 | 0.079 | [−0.501, 0.681] | 0.305 | 0.762 | 0.090 | [−0.404, 0.622] |
3 | DvsHC | III | avg | 27 vs 21 | 0.204 | 0.839 | 0.064 | [−0.642, 0.684] | −1.161 | 0.252 | −0.366 | [−0.994, 0.310] |
4 | DvsHC | III | csd | 27 vs 21 | −0.162 | 0.872 | −0.051 | [−0.691, 0.547] | −0.703 | 0.486 | −0.221 | [−0.998, 0.558] |
5 | DvsHC | IV | avg | 22 vs 71 | 0.310 | 0.757 | 0.077 | [−0.338, 0.504] | 0.085 | 0.933 | 0.021 | [−0.412, 0.450] |
6 | DvsHC | IV | csd | 22 vs 71 | 0.978 | 0.331 | 0.244 | [−0.250, 0.816] | −1.484 | 0.141 | −0.370 | [−0.842, 0.135] |
7 | DvsHC | V | avg | 24 vs 29 | 1.862 | 0.069 | 0.540 | [0.033, 1.044] | 1.817 | 0.075 | 0.527 | [−0.008, 1.101] |
8 | DvsHC | V | csd | 24 vs 29 | 0.518 | 0.607 | 0.150 | [−0.415, 0.742] | −0.722 | 0.474 | −0.209 | [−0.689, 0.235] |
9 | SvsHC | II | avg | 23 vs 28 | 0.351 | 0.728 | 0.105 | [−0.444, 0.746] | −0.654 | 0.516 | −0.196 | [−0.883, 0.450] |
10 | SvsHC | II | csd | 23 vs 28 | 1.293 | 0.203 | 0.387 | [−0.152, 0.943] | 0.035 | 0.972 | 0.010 | [−0.653, 0.532] |
11 | SvsHC | III | avg | 33 vs 21 | −1.169 | 0.248 | −0.350 | [−0.946, 0.285] | −1.768 | 0.084 | −0.529 | [−1.071, 0.029] |
12 | SvsHC | III | csd | 33 vs 21 | −1.382 | 0.173 | −0.414 | [−1.086, 0.160] | −1.197 | 0.237 | −0.358 | [−0.997, 0.212] |
13 | SvsHC | IV | avg | 21 vs 71 | 1.058 | 0.293 | 0.269 | [−0.232, 0.776] | 0.466 | 0.642 | 0.118 | [−0.293, 0.515] |
14 | SvsHC | IV | csd | 21 vs 71 | 0.739 | 0.462 | 0.188 | [−0.302, 0.649] | −0.263 | 0.793 | −0.067 | [−0.524, 0.483] |
15 | allReg | I | avg | 54 | −1.352 | 0.182 | −0.188 | [−0.440, 0.078] | −0.349 | 0.728 | −0.049 | [−0.369, 0.240] |
16 | allReg | I | csd | 54 | −0.431 | 0.668 | −0.061 | [−0.313, 0.187] | −0.019 | 0.985 | −0.003 | [−0.335, 0.304] |
17 | allReg | III | avg | 91 | 0.233 | 0.816 | 0.025 | [−0.156, 0.263] | −1.170 | 0.245 | −0.127 | [−0.313, 0.092] |
18 | allReg | III | csd | 91 | −0.005 | 0.996 | −0.001 | [−0.190, 0.204] | −0.060 | 0.953 | −0.007 | [−0.238, 0.224] |
19 | allReg | IV | avg | 116 | 0.904 | 0.368 | 0.085 | [−0.088, 0.237] | 0.355 | 0.723 | 0.034 | [−0.139, 0.197] |
20 | allReg | IV | csd | 116 | 1.461 | 0.147 | 0.137 | [−0.064, 0.316] | −1.300 | 0.196 | −0.122 | [−0.296, 0.059] |
21 | allReg | V | avg | 53 | 1.685 | 0.099 | 0.236 | [−0.014, 0.449] | 1.544 | 0.129 | 0.218 | [−0.034, 0.433] |
22 | allReg | V | csd | 53 | 0.769 | 0.446 | 0.110 | [−0.148, 0.339] | −0.058 | 0.954 | −0.008 | [−0.214, 0.185] |
23 | DReg | I | avg | 29 | 0.767 | 0.450 | 0.152 | [−0.324, 0.503] | 0.265 | 0.793 | 0.053 | [−0.452, 0.564] |
24 | DReg | I | csd | 29 | −1.273 | 0.215 | −0.247 | [−0.588, 0.156] | −0.506 | 0.617 | −0.101 | [−0.504, 0.437] |
25 | DReg | III | avg | 27 | −0.054 | 0.958 | −0.012 | [−0.434, 0.485] | −0.079 | 0.937 | −0.018 | [−0.425, 0.346] |
26 | DReg | III | csd | 27 | 0.055 | 0.957 | 0.012 | [−0.407, 0.408] | 1.375 | 0.184 | 0.294 | [−0.096, 0.614] |
27 | DReg | IV | avg | 22 | 1.979 | 0.063 | 0.423 | [−0.001, 0.719] | −0.062 | 0.951 | −0.015 | [−0.409, 0.473] |
28 | DReg | IV | csd | 22 | 1.761 | 0.095 | 0.383 | [0.004, 0.674] | −0.269 | 0.791 | −0.063 | [−0.538, 0.418] |
29 | DReg | V | avg | 24 | 0.926 | 0.366 | 0.208 | [−0.209, 0.565] | −0.707 | 0.488 | −0.160 | [−0.571, 0.278] |
30 | DReg | V | csd | 24 | 0.723 | 0.478 | 0.164 | [−0.345, 0.554] | 0.298 | 0.769 | 0.068 | [−0.569, 0.735] |
DvsHC – diagnosed and healthy controls; SvsHC – sub-clinical and healthy controls; allReg – linear regression for all subjects together; DReg – linear regression for only diagnosed subjects; avg – average reference; csd – current source density.
Each row represents cluster-based results for a given contrast, study, and space combination (N: number of participants included in given contrast; min t, max t: lowest and highest t value in the …
No. | Contrast | Study | Space | N | Cluster-based permutation test on frontal asymmetry space | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min t | Max t | n significant points | n clusters | Largest cluster size | Largest cluster p | |||||
1 | DvsHC | I | avg | 29 vs 22 | −2.110 | 0.023 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0.069 |
2 | DvsHC | I | csd | 29 vs 22 | −0.720 | 1.983 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
3 | DvsHC | III | avg | 27 vs 21 | −1.172 | 1.058 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
4 | DvsHC | III | csd | 27 vs 21 | −1.258 | 1.875 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
5 | DvsHC | IV | avg | 22 vs 72 | −0.751 | 2.069 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.345 |
6 | DvsHC | IV | csd | 22 vs 72 | −1.600 | 1.142 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
7 | DvsHC | V | avg | 24 vs 29 | −1.260 | 2.823 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 0.026 |
8 | DvsHC | V | csd | 24 vs 29 | −2.901 | 1.425 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.156 |
9 | SvsHC | II | avg | 23 vs 28 | −2.581 | 0.201 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.164z |
10 | SvsHC | II | csd | 23 vs 28 | −0.855 | 1.254 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
11 | SvsHC | III | avg | 33 vs 21 | −1.410 | 1.021 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
12 | SvsHC | III | csd | 33 vs 21 | −2.315 | 2.101 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.227 |
13 | SvsHC | IV | avg | 21 vs 72 | −1.356 | 2.760 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.052 |
14 | SvsHC | IV | csd | 21 vs 72 | −1.193 | 1.296 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
15 | allReg | I | avg | 54 | −1.519 | 0.022 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
16 | allReg | I | csd | 54 | −0.727 | 1.052 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
17 | allReg | III | avg | 91 | −1.207 | 0.906 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
18 | allReg | III | csd | 91 | −1.290 | 2.210 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.287 |
19 | allReg | IV | avg | 117 | −1.807 | 2.153 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.202 |
20 | allReg | IV | csd | 117 | −1.173 | 1.353 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
21 | allReg | V | avg | 53 | −1.001 | 2.489 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0.077 |
22 | allReg | V | csd | 53 | −3.291 | 1.552 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.187 |
23 | DReg | I | avg | 29 | −0.159 | 1.552 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
24 | DReg | I | csd | 29 | −1.303 | 0.487 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
25 | DReg | III | avg | 27 | −2.041 | 0.976 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
26 | DReg | III | csd | 27 | −1.420 | 1.662 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
27 | DReg | IV | avg | 22 | −1.155 | 1.754 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
28 | DReg | IV | csd | 22 | −0.415 | 1.938 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
29 | DReg | V | avg | 24 | −1.482 | 1.497 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
30 | DReg | V | csd | 24 | −2.254 | 1.554 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.555 |
DvsHC – diagnosed and healthy controls; SvsHC – sub-clinical and healthy controls; allReg – linear regression for all subjects together; DReg – linear regression for only diagnosed subjects; avg – average reference; csd – current source density.
Each row represents cluster-based results for a given contrast, study and space combination (N: number of participants included in given contrast; min t, max t: lowest and highest t value in the …
No. | Contrast | Study | Space | N | Cluster-based permutation test on frontal asymmetry space corrected for confounds | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min t | Max t | n significant points | n clusters | Largest cluster size | Largest cluster p | |||||
1 | DvsHC | I | avg | 29 vs 22 | −2.679 | −0.149 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0.023 |
2 | DvsHC | I | csd | 29 vs 22 | −1.020 | 1.591 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
3 | DvsHC | III | avg | 27 vs 21 | −1.506 | 1.361 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
4 | DvsHC | III | csd | 27 vs 21 | −1.310 | 1.378 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
5 | DvsHC | IV | avg | 22 vs 71 | −0.814 | 1.812 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
6 | DvsHC | IV | csd | 22 vs 71 | −1.812 | 0.978 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
7 | DvsHC | V | avg | 24 vs 29 | −1.618 | 2.341 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0.327 |
8 | DvsHC | V | csd | 24 vs 29 | −3.017 | 0.738 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.205 |
9 | SvsHC | II | avg | 23 vs 28 | −2.622 | 0.351 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.177 |
10 | SvsHC | II | csd | 23 vs 28 | −0.838 | 1.742 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
11 | SvsHC | III | avg | 33 vs 21 | −1.768 | 1.218 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
12 | SvsHC | III | csd | 33 vs 21 | −2.090 | 1.899 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.358 |
13 | SvsHC | IV | avg | 21 vs 71 | −1.584 | 1.490 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
14 | SvsHC | IV | csd | 21 vs 71 | −1.400 | 0.739 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
15 | allReg | I | avg | 54 | −1.726 | 0.039 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
16 | allReg | I | csd | 54 | −0.816 | 0.987 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
17 | allReg | III | avg | 91 | −1.231 | 0.722 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
18 | allReg | III | csd | 91 | −1.540 | 2.119 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.335 |
19 | allReg | IV | avg | 116 | −1.804 | 1.852 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
20 | allReg | IV | csd | 116 | −1.300 | 1.461 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
21 | allReg | V | avg | 53 | −1.286 | 2.350 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.324 |
22 | allReg | V | csd | 53 | −3.541 | 0.832 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.173 |
23 | DReg | I | avg | 29 | −0.244 | 1.516 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
24 | DReg | I | csd | 29 | −1.291 | 0.565 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
25 | DReg | III | avg | 27 | −1.700 | 0.852 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
26 | DReg | III | csd | 27 | −1.311 | 1.574 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
27 | DReg | IV | avg | 22 | −1.173 | 2.728 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.121 |
28 | DReg | IV | csd | 22 | −0.269 | 2.235 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.260 |
29 | DReg | V | avg | 24 | −1.593 | 0.926 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
30 | DReg | V | csd | 24 | −2.075 | 2.586 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.376 |
DvsHC – diagnosed and healthy controls; SvsHC – sub-clinical and healthy controls; allReg – linear regression for all subjects together; DReg – linear regression for only diagnosed subjects; avg – average reference; csd – current source density.
Each row represents cluster-based results for given contrast, study, and space (N: number of participants included in given contrast). Results for cluster-based permutation test on frontal asymmetry …
No. | Contrast | Study | Space | N | Cluster-based analyses on standardized data | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min t | Max t | n significant points | n clusters | Largest cluster size | Largest cluster p | |||||
1 | DvsHC | I | avg | 29 vs 22 | −1.453 | 1.434 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
2 | DvsHC | I | csd | 29 vs 22 | −2.227 | 1.879 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0.718 |
3 | DvsHC | III | avg | 27 vs 21 | −1.999 | 2.326 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.468 |
4 | DvsHC | III | csd | 27 vs 21 | −2.917 | 3.882 | 23 | 3 | 16 | 0.063 |
5 | DvsHC | IV | avg | 22 vs 72 | −4.256 | 3.053 | 129 | 2 | 66 | 0.007 |
6 | DvsHC | IV | csd | 22 vs 72 | −3.180 | 2.582 | 22 | 7 | 6 | 0.259 |
7 | DvsHC | V | avg | 24 vs 29 | −2.516 | 2.267 | 21 | 3 | 15 | 0.223 |
8 | DvsHC | V | csd | 24 vs 29 | −2.703 | 2.420 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 0.723 |
9 | SvsHC | II | avg | 23 vs 28 | −1.685 | 2.185 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.774 |
10 | SvsHC | II | csd | 23 vs 28 | −2.059 | 1.714 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.941 |
11 | SvsHC | III | avg | 33 vs 21 | −1.906 | 1.946 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
12 | SvsHC | III | csd | 33 vs 21 | −2.284 | 3.091 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0.577 |
13 | SvsHC | IV | avg | 21 vs 72 | −2.319 | 2.519 | 19 | 5 | 5 | 0.306 |
14 | SvsHC | IV | csd | 21 vs 72 | −2.950 | 3.130 | 25 | 4 | 11 | 0.092 |
15 | allReg | I | avg | 54 | −1.295 | 1.450 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
16 | allReg | I | csd | 54 | −2.082 | 1.899 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
17 | allReg | III | avg | 91 | −1.814 | 1.949 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
18 | allReg | III | csd | 91 | −2.626 | 2.547 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 0.692 |
19 | allReg | IV | avg | 117 | −3.406 | 2.701 | 75 | 4 | 40 | 0.079 |
20 | allReg | IV | csd | 117 | −2.644 | 2.918 | 32 | 5 | 13 | 0.179 |
21 | allReg | V | avg | 53 | −2.752 | 2.321 | 22 | 6 | 13 | 0.477 |
22 | allReg | V | csd | 53 | −3.733 | 2.023 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 0.891 |
23 | DReg | I | avg | 29 | −2.011 | 1.936 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
24 | DReg | I | csd | 29 | −2.721 | 2.093 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1.000 |
25 | DReg | III | avg | 27 | −4.167 | 3.824 | 89 | 2 | 53 | 0.025 |
26 | DReg | III | csd | 27 | −3.525 | 3.285 | 34 | 4 | 17 | 0.105 |
27 | DReg | IV | avg | 22 | −1.802 | 2.213 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.888 |
28 | DReg | IV | csd | 22 | −2.219 | 2.890 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 0.316 |
29 | DReg | V | avg | 24 | −2.926 | 4.155 | 58 | 7 | 18 | 0.354 |
30 | DReg | V | csd | 24 | −3.551 | 3.084 | 46 | 9 | 14 | 0.387 |
DvsHC – diagnosed and healthy controls; SvsHC – sub-clinical and healthy controls; allReg – linear regression for all subjects together; DReg – linear regression for only diagnosed subjects; avg – average reference; csd – current source density.
Each row represents cluster-based results for given contrast, study, and space (N: number of participants included in given contrast). Results for cluster-based permutation test on frontal asymmetry …
No. | Contrast | Study | Space | N | Cluster-based analyses on standardized data corrected for confounds | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min t | Max t | n significant points | n clusters | Largest cluster size | Largest cluster p | |||||
1 | DvsHC | I | avg | 29 vs 22 | −1.766 | 1.716 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
2 | DvsHC | I | csd | 29 vs 22 | −2.007 | 1.614 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
3 | DvsHC | III | avg | 27 vs 21 | −1.387 | 1.896 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
4 | DvsHC | III | csd | 27 vs 21 | −3.345 | 3.054 | 17 | 4 | 6 | 0.567 |
5 | DvsHC | IV | avg | 22 vs 71 | −4.295 | 3.304 | 143 | 2 | 72 | 0.006 |
6 | DvsHC | IV | csd | 22 vs 71 | −3.095 | 2.854 | 33 | 5 | 12 | 0.179 |
7 | DvsHC | V | avg | 24 vs 29 | −1.982 | 1.976 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
8 | DvsHC | V | csd | 24 vs 29 | −2.026 | 2.798 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 0.772 |
9 | SvsHC | II | avg | 23 vs 28 | −1.511 | 1.841 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
10 | SvsHC | II | csd | 23 vs 28 | −2.059 | 1.876 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
11 | SvsHC | III | avg | 33 vs 21 | −2.964 | 2.422 | 22 | 5 | 10 | 0.374 |
12 | SvsHC | III | csd | 33 vs 21 | −2.424 | 3.562 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0.865 |
13 | SvsHC | IV | avg | 21 vs 71 | −2.667 | 2.858 | 34 | 3 | 31 | 0.113 |
14 | SvsHC | IV | csd | 21 vs 71 | −2.389 | 3.317 | 23 | 3 | 10 | 0.273 |
15 | allReg | I | avg | 54 | −1.404 | 1.614 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
16 | allReg | I | csd | 54 | −1.752 | 2.155 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1.000 |
17 | allReg | III | avg | 91 | −2.119 | 1.963 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0.612 |
18 | allReg | III | csd | 91 | −2.558 | 2.825 | 25 | 3 | 17 | 0.112 |
19 | allReg | IV | avg | 116 | −3.414 | 3.009 | 92 | 4 | 54 | 0.038 |
20 | allReg | IV | csd | 116 | −2.571 | 3.112 | 32 | 6 | 11 | 0.216 |
21 | allReg | V | avg | 53 | −1.942 | 2.057 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
22 | allReg | V | csd | 53 | −3.005 | 2.362 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 0.945 |
23 | DReg | I | avg | 29 | −1.902 | 1.990 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
24 | DReg | I | csd | 29 | −2.583 | 2.088 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0.955 |
25 | DReg | III | avg | 27 | −3.938 | 3.530 | 70 | 4 | 36 | 0.073 |
26 | DReg | III | csd | 27 | −3.198 | 4.098 | 39 | 7 | 21 | 0.035 |
27 | DReg | IV | avg | 22 | −2.213 | 2.662 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.659 |
28 | DReg | IV | csd | 22 | −3.056 | 3.114 | 16 | 4 | 10 | 0.265 |
29 | DReg | V | avg | 24 | −3.200 | 4.246 | 84 | 7 | 27 | 0.266 |
30 | DReg | V | csd | 24 | −3.533 | 3.378 | 78 | 7 | 36 | 0.092 |
DvsHC – diagnosed and healthy controls; SvsHC – sub-clinical and healthy controls; allReg – linear regression for all subjects together; DReg – linear regression for only diagnosed subjects; avg – average reference; csd – current source density.
Each row represents source level results for given contrast, study, and space (N: number of participants included in given contrast). Results for cluster-based permutation test on frontal asymmetry …
No. | Contrast | Study | N | Source level analysis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min t | Max t | n significant points | n clusters | Largest cluster size | Largest cluster p | ||||
1 | DvsHC | I | 29 vs 22 | −1.906 | 2.404 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.489 |
2 | DvsHC | III | 27 vs 21 | −2.557 | 1.158 | 29 | 4 | 14 | 0.267 |
3 | DvsHC | IV | 22 vs 72 | −3.921 | 1.151 | 320 | 2 | 316 | 0.010 |
4 | DvsHC | V | 24 vs 29 | −2.612 | 0.943 | 24 | 1 | 24 | 0.207 |
5 | SvsHC | II | 23 vs 28 | −0.909 | 1.321 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
6 | SvsHC | III | 34 vs 21 | −1.809 | 1.341 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
7 | SvsHC | IV | 21 vs 72 | −2.339 | 0.679 | 11 | 1 | 11 | 0.340 |
8 | allReg | I | 54 | −2.319 | 1.549 | 20 | 1 | 20 | 0.367 |
9 | allReg | III | 92 | −2.232 | 0.290 | 21 | 2 | 20 | 0.343 |
10 | allReg | IV | 117 | −2.220 | 1.211 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 0.466 |
11 | allReg | V | 53 | −2.644 | 1.201 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 0.574 |
12 | DReg | I | 29 | −2.292 | 1.150 | 41 | 2 | 22 | 0.328 |
13 | DReg | III | 27 | −2.624 | −0.375 | 26 | 3 | 18 | 0.335 |
14 | DReg | IV | 22 | −1.216 | 2.064 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
15 | DReg | V | 24 | −2.068 | 1.758 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
DvsHC – diagnosed and healthy controls; SvsHC – sub-clinical and healthy controls; allReg – linear regression for all subjects together; DReg – linear regression for only diagnosed subjects.
Each row represents source level results for given contrast, study, and space (N: number of participants included in given contrast) Results for cluster-based permutation test on frontal asymmetry …
No. | Contrast | Study | N | Source level analysis corrected for confounds | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min t | Max t | n significant points | n clusters | Largest cluster size | Largest cluster p | ||||
1 | DvsHC | I | 29 vs 22 | −1.416 | 2.057 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.708 |
2 | DvsHC | III | 27 vs 21 | −2.161 | 1.704 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0.555 |
3 | DvsHC | IV | 22 vs 71 | −3.685 | 1.066 | 365 | 2 | 346 | 0.011 |
4 | DvsHC | V | 24 vs 29 | −2.630 | 0.287 | 64 | 3 | 46 | 0.231 |
5 | SvsHC | II | 23 vs 28 | −0.814 | 1.911 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
6 | SvsHC | III | 34 vs 21 | −1.770 | 1.526 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
7 | SvsHC | IV | 21 vs 71 | −2.732 | −0.083 | 58 | 1 | 58 | 0.192 |
8 | allReg | I | 54 | −1.846 | 1.143 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
9 | allReg | III | 92 | −2.195 | 0.698 | 15 | 1 | 15 | 0.391 |
10 | allReg | IV | 116 | −2.313 | 0.910 | 44 | 4 | 19 | 0.375 |
11 | allReg | V | 53 | −2.901 | 0.317 | 79 | 4 | 36 | 0.264 |
12 | DReg | I | 29 | −2.164 | 1.010 | 15 | 2 | 11 | 0.428 |
13 | DReg | III | 27 | −2.991 | 0.175 | 66 | 3 | 63 | 0.186 |
14 | DReg | IV | 22 | −1.397 | 1.818 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
15 | DReg | V | 24 | −2.893 | 1.784 | 22 | 1 | 22 | 0.352 |
DvsHC – diagnosed and healthy controls; SvsHC – sub-clinical and healthy controls; allReg – linear regression for all subjects together; DReg – linear regression for only diagnosed subjects; nonDReg – linear regression for only the non-diagnosed subjects.
Each row represents a given contrast × reference × control for confounds combination. N: number of participants included in given contrast, control for confounds: whether the FAA data was …
No. | Contrast | Space | N | Control for confounds | Aggregated channel pair analyses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pair 1 (F3–F4) | Pair 2 (F7–F8) | |||||||||||
ES | CI | BF01 | ES | CI | BF01 | |||||||
1 | DvsHC | avg | 102 vs 144 | − | 0.147 | [−0.111, 0.396] | 3.831 | 0.098 | [−0.161, 0.338] | 5.405 | ||
2 | DvsHC | avg | 102 vs 143 | + | −0.011 | [−0.264, 0.244] | 7.042 | −0.006 | [−0.266, 0.240] | 7.042 | ||
3 | DvsHC | csd | 102 vs 144 | − | 0.188 | [−0.069, 0.449] | 2.597 | −0.100 | [−0.354, 0.164] | 5.319 | ||
4 | DvsHC | csd | 102 vs 143 | + | 0.103 | [−0.159, 0.362] | 5.236 | −0.164 | [−0.417, 0.108] | 3.300 | ||
5 | SvsHC | avg | 77 vs 121 | − | 0.065 | [−0.236, 0.359] | 5.780 | −0.025 | [−0.320, 0.240] | 6.250 | ||
6 | SvsHC | avg | 77 vs 120 | + | 0.024 | [−0.269, 0.315] | 6.211 | −0.144 | [−0.447, 0.140] | 4.016 | ||
7 | SvsHC | csd | 77 vs 121 | − | 0.053 | [−0.223, 0.355] | 5.952 | −0.108 | [−0.372, 0.179] | 4.878 | ||
8 | SvsHC | csd | 77 vs 120 | + | 0.053 | [−0.222, 0.350] | 5.952 | −0.110 | [−0.389, 0.179] | 4.831 | ||
9 | DReg | avg | 102 | − | 0.188 | [0.006, 0.354] | 1.387 | 0.007 | [−0.186, 0.188] | 8.065 | ||
10 | DReg | avg | 102 | + | 0.175 | [−0.018, 0.348] | 1.742 | −0.029 | [−0.211, 0.155] | 7.752 | ||
11 | DReg | csd | 102 | − | 0.099 | [−0.072, 0.260] | 4.975 | 0.065 | [−0.136, 0.252] | 6.579 | ||
12 | DReg | csd | 102 | + | 0.051 | [−0.131, 0.216] | 7.092 | 0.048 | [−0.157, 0.255] | 7.194 | ||
13 | allReg | avg | 315 | − | 0.085 | [−0.017, 0.184] | 4.651 | 0.029 | [−0.080, 0.126] | 12.5 | ||
14 | allReg | avg | 314 | + | 0.041 | [−0.063, 0.143] | 10.87 | 0.001 | [−0.120, 0.104] | 14.085 | ||
15 | allReg | csd | 315 | − | 0.059 | [−0.054, 0.166] | 8.333 | −0.026 | [−0.141, 0.082] | 12.821 | ||
16 | allReg | csd | 314 | + | 0.055 | [−0.056, 0.168] | 8.772 | −0.048 | [−0.158, 0.059] | 9.901 |
DvsHC – diagnosed and healthy controls; SvsHC – sub-clinical and healthy controls; allReg – linear regression for all subjects together; DReg – linear regression for only diagnosed subjects; avg – average reference; csd – current source density.
Each row represents the result for given contrast × control for confounds combination. N: number of participants included in given contrast, control for confounds: whether the FAA data was …
No. | Contrast | N | Control for confounds | Aggregated source level analyses | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min t | Max t | n significant points | n clusters | Largest cluster size | Largest cluster p | ||||
1 | DvsHC | 102 vs 144 | − | −2.719 | 0.956 | 178 | 5 | 100 | 0.077 |
2 | DvsHC | 102 vs 143 | + | −2.846 | 0.908 | 211 | 5 | 116 | 0.066 |
3 | SvsHC | 77 vs 121 | − | −1.831 | −0.11 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
4 | SvsHC | 77 vs 120 | + | −1.871 | 0.182 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA |
5 | DReg | 102 | − | −2.387 | 1.376 | 31 | 3 | 25 | 0.328 |
6 | DReg | 102 | + | −3.095 | 1.354 | 112 | 3 | 68 | 0.155 |
7 | allReg | 315 | − | −3.044 | 0.411 | 174 | 6 | 160 | 0.067 |
8 | allReg | 314 | + | −3.107 | 0.282 | 235 | 6 | 195 | 0.054 |
DvsHC – diagnosed and healthy controls; SvsHC – sub-clinical and healthy controls; allReg – linear regression for all subjects together; DReg – linear regression for only diagnosed subjects.
If one or more such results have been found for a given cell, then the p-value for the binomial test is also shown.
Number of significant results congruent with the FAA effect | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Channel pairs N = 120 | Cluster correction N = 60 | Source space N = 30 | |||
DvsHC | 2/32, p=0.48 | 1/16, p=0.56 | 2/8, p=0.057 | ||
SvsHC | 0/24 | 0/12 | 0/6 | ||
DReg | 0/32 | 0/16 | 0/8 | ||
allReg | 0/32 | 0/16 | 0/8 |
Study I (N=51) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Diagnosed | Healthy Controls, BDI-I ≤ 5 | Subclinical | Unclassified | |
N | 29 | 22 | - | - |
Age | M = 27.66, SD = 7.13 | M = 23.68, SD = 2.83 | - | - |
19 - 47 range | 20 - 33 range | - | - | |
Gender | 9 male, 20 female | 11 male, 11 female | - | - |
BDI-I score | M = 20.93, SD = 8.21 | M = 2.00, SD = 1.48 | - | - |
Study II (N=76) | ||||
Undiagnosed (N=76) | ||||
Diagnosed | Healthy Controls, BDI-I ≤ 5 | Subclinical, BDI-I ≥ 10 | Unclassified, 5 < BDI-I < 10 | |
N | - | 28 | 25 | 23 |
Age | - | M = 25.32, SD = 6.46 | M = 24.44, SD = 5.08 | M = 25.22, SD = 6.78 |
- | 18 - 43 range | 19 - 38 range | 18 - 40 range | |
Gender | - | 8 males, 20 females | 4 males, 21 females | 9 males, 14 females |
BDI-I score | - | M = 2.29, SD = 1.72 | M = 17.56, SD = 8.13 | M = 7.91, SD = 1.16 |
Study III (N=91) | ||||
Diagnosed | Undiagnosed (N=64) | |||
Healthy Controls, BDI-II ≤ 5 | Subclinical, BDI-II ≥ 10 | Unclassified, 5 < BDI-II < 10 | ||
N | 27 | 21 | 34 | 9 |
Age | M = 27.19, SD = 7.23 | M = 24.29, SD = 4.99 | M = 25.06, SD = 6.58 | M = 26.78, SD = 8.74 |
19 - 42 range | 19 - 41 range | 18 - 44 range | 22 - 49 range | |
Gender | 6 males, 21 females | 7 males, 14 females | 10 males, 24 females | 2 males, 7 females |
BDI-II score | M = 34.26, SD = 9.18 | M = 2.24, SD = 1.70 | M = 24.06, SD = 10.08 | M = 6.78, SD = 0.97 |
Study IV (N=117) | ||||
Diagnosed | Undiagnosed (N=95) | |||
Healthy Controls, BDI-II ≤ 5 | Subclinical, BDI-II ≥ 10 | Unclassified, 5 < BDI-II < 10 | ||
N | 22 | 72 | 21 | 2 |
(12 past MDD, 10 present MDD) | ||||
Age | M = 18.91, SD = 1.34 | M = 19.00, SD = 1.23 | M = 18.43, SD = 0.81 | M = 18.00 |
18 - 24 range | 18 - 23 range | 18 - 21 range | ages 18, 18 | |
Gender | 8 males, 14 females | 33 males, 39 females | 3 males, 18 females | 1 males, 1 females |
BDI-II score | M = 21.82, SD = 5.70 | M = 1.60, SD = 1.48 | M = 22.95, SD = 4.25 | M = 6.50, SD = 0.71 |
Study V (N=53) | ||||
Diagnosed | Healthy Controls, PHQ-9 ≤ 5 | Subclinical | Unclassified | |
N | 24 | 29 | - | - |
Age | M = 30.88, SD = 10.37 | M = 31.45, SD = 9.15 | - | - |
16 - 52 range | 19 - 52 range | - | - | |
Gender | 13 males, 11 females | 11 males, 13 females | - | - |
PHQ-9 score | M = 18.33, SD = 3.50 | M = 2.66, SD = 1.80 | - | - |
STUDY | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | IV | V | ||
Contrast type | ||||||
DvsHC | + | + | + | + | ||
SvsHC | + | + | + | |||
allReg | + | + | + | + | ||
DReg | + | + | + | + | ||
Control for confounds | ||||||
gender | + | + | + | + | + | |
age | + | + | + | + | + | |
education | + | + | + | |||